Literature DB >> 8189189

Stroop process dissociations: the relationship between facilitation and interference.

D S Lindsay1, L L Jacoby.   

Abstract

L.L. Jacoby's (1991) "process dissociation procedure" was used to quantitatively estimate the contributions of color-naming and word-reading processes to responding on the Stroop task. The results show that color naming and word reading can operate independently to determine responses. Degrading stimulus colors eliminated the typical asymmetry between Stroop facilitation and interference, as predicted by the equations (Experiments 1 and 2). Degrading stimulus colors reduced the estimated contribution of color naming to responding but had no effect on the estimated contribution of word reading (Experiment 2). In contrast, increasing the proportion of incongruent items reduced the estimated contribution of word reading but had no effect on the estimated contribution of color naming (Experiments 3 and 4). The results indicate that the facilitating and interfering effects of automatic processes cannot be accurately measured in terms of differences from baseline.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8189189     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.20.2.219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  67 in total

1.  Further evidence on the similarity of memory processes in the process dissociation procedure and in source monitoring.

Authors:  M C Steffens; A Buchner; H Martensen; E Erdfelder
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-10

2.  Parsing executive processes: strategic vs. evaluative functions of the anterior cingulate cortex.

Authors:  C S Carter; A M Macdonald; M Botvinick; L L Ross; V A Stenger; D Noll; J D Cohen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The myth of ballistic processing: evidence from Stroop's paradigm.

Authors:  D Besner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-06

4.  Item-specific control of automatic processes: stroop process dissociations.

Authors:  Larry L Jacoby; D Stephen Lindsay; Sandra Hessels
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-09

5.  The process-dissociation approach two decades later: convergence, boundary conditions, and new directions.

Authors:  Andrew P Yonelinas; Larry L Jacoby
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-07

6.  Proactive control of irrelevant task rules during cued task switching.

Authors:  Julie M Bugg; Todd S Braver
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-07-28

7.  Implicitly strengthened task-irrelevant stimulus-response associations modulate cognitive control: Evidence from an fMRI study.

Authors:  Tiansheng Xia; Hui Li; Ling Wang
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  The role of response mechanisms in determining reaction time performance: Piéron's law revisited.

Authors:  Tom Stafford; Kevin N Gurney
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-12

9.  The effects of age and task context on Stroop task performance.

Authors:  Sharon A Mutter; Jennifer C Naylor; Emily R Patterson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-04

10.  Item-specific congruency effects in nonverbal auditory Stroop.

Authors:  Launa C Leboe; Todd A Mondor
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-04-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.