Literature DB >> 1688770

Effects of mnemonic strategy manipulation in a Von Restorff paradigm.

M Fabiani1, D Karis, E Donchin.   

Abstract

Subjects were instructed to use either rote or elaborative strategies to memorize words in a Von Restorff paradigm. When instructed to use rote strategies, subjects displayed a higher Von Restorff effect and a lower recall performance than when instructed to use elaborative strategies. Furthermore the amplitude of the P300 component of the event-related brain potential predicted subsequent recall only when subjects used rote strategies. When subjects used elaborative strategies, the relationship between P300 amplitude and subsequent recall was not observed. These results confirm and expand, in a within-subjects design, the results reported by Karis, Fabiani and Donchin (1984) who capitalized on different strategies used by different subjects. These results also lend support to a 3-phase model of the von Restorff effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 1688770     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(90)90149-e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  40 in total

1.  Non-linguistic auditory processing and working memory update in pre-school children who stutter: an electrophysiological study.

Authors:  Natalya Kaganovich; Amanda Hampton Wray; Christine Weber-Fox
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.253

Review 2.  Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b.

Authors:  John Polich
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Evidence for attentional gradient in the serial position memory curve from event-related potentials.

Authors:  Allen Azizian; John Polich
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Dissociable effects of top-down and bottom-up attention during episodic encoding.

Authors:  Melina R Uncapher; J Benjamin Hutchinson; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  P300 as a measure of cognitive dysfunction from occupational and environmental insults.

Authors:  J B Pan; T Takeshita; K Morimoto
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.674

6.  Does the isolation effect require attention?

Authors:  Tamra J Bireta; Colleen M Mazzei
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-01

7.  Predictive cues and age-related declines in working memory performance.

Authors:  Namita A Padgaonkar; Theodore P Zanto; Jacob Bollinger; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 4.673

8.  Is what goes in what comes out? Encoding and retrieval event-related potentials together determine memory outcome.

Authors:  Yvonne Y Chen; Kirstie Lithgow; Jumjury A Hemmerich; Jeremy B Caplan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-06-15       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Tracking neural correlates of successful learning over repeated sequence observations.

Authors:  Natalie A Steinemann; Clara Moisello; M Felice Ghilardi; Simon P Kelly
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Distinct patterns of neural activity during memory formation of nonwords versus words.

Authors:  Leun J Otten; Josefin Sveen; Angela H Quayle
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.