Literature DB >> 17892393

Evidence for attentional gradient in the serial position memory curve from event-related potentials.

Allen Azizian1, John Polich.   

Abstract

The occurrence of primacy versus recency effects in free recall is suggested to reflect either two distinct memory systems, or the operation of a single system that is modulated by allocation of attention and less vulnerable to interference. Behavioral and event-related brain potential (ERPs) measures were used to investigate the encoding substrates of the serial position curve and subsequent recall in young adults. Participants were instructed to remember lists of words consisting of 12 common nouns each presented once every 1.5 sec, with a recall signal following the last word to indicate that all remembered items should be written on paper. This procedure was repeated for 20 different word lists. Both performance and late ERP amplitudes reflected classic recall serial position effects. Greater recall and larger late positive component amplitudes were obtained for the primacy and recency items, with less recall and smaller amplitudes for the middle words. The late positive component was larger for recalled compared to unrecalled primacy items, but it did not differ between memory performance outcomes for the recency items. The close relationship between the enhanced amplitude and primacy retrieval supports the view that this positive component reflects one of a process series related to attentional gradient and encoding of events for storage in memory. Recency effects appear to index operations determined by the anticipation of the last stimulus presentation, which occurred for both recalled and unrecalled memory items. Theoretical implications are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17892393      PMCID: PMC2748728          DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.12.2071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  50 in total

1.  An endogenous distributed model of ordering in serial recall.

Authors:  Simon Farrell; Stephan Lewandowsky
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-03

2.  Reactivation of encoding-related brain activity during memory retrieval.

Authors:  L Nyberg; R Habib; A R McIntosh; E Tulving
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Hippocampal activations during encoding and retrieval in a verbal working memory paradigm.

Authors:  Katherine H Karlsgodt; David Shirinyan; Theo G M van Erp; Mark S Cohen; Tyrone D Cannon
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Neuroimaging the serial position curve. A test of single-store versus dual-store models.

Authors:  Deborah Talmi; Cheryl L Grady; Yonatan Goshen-Gottstein; Morris Moscovitch
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-09

5.  The primacy model: a new model of immediate serial recall.

Authors:  M P Page; D Norris
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Neural correlates of encoding in an incidental learning paradigm.

Authors:  K A Paller; M Kutas; A R Mayes
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-10

7.  An event-related potential study of encoding in young and older adults.

Authors:  D Friedman; C Trott
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Modality effects in short-term memory: storage or retrieval?

Authors:  B B Murdock
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1968-05

9.  A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP.

Authors:  H V Semlitsch; P Anderer; P Schuster; O Presslich
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity.

Authors:  M Kutas; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-01-11       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  36 in total

1.  Threat as a feature in visual semantic object memory.

Authors:  Clifford S Calley; Michael A Motes; H-Sheng Chiang; Virginia Buhl; Jeffrey S Spence; Hervé Abdi; Raksha Anand; Mandy Maguire; Leonardo Estevez; Richard Briggs; Thomas Freeman; Michael A Kraut; John Hart
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-03-25       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b.

Authors:  John Polich
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Affective visual event-related potentials: arousal, valence, and repetition effects for normal and distorted pictures.

Authors:  Bella Rozenkrants; Jonas K Olofsson; John Polich
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2007-11-04       Impact factor: 2.997

Review 4.  Affective picture processing: an integrative review of ERP findings.

Authors:  Jonas K Olofsson; Steven Nordin; Henrique Sequeira; John Polich
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2007-11-17       Impact factor: 3.251

5.  Heritability of the neural response to emotional pictures: evidence from ERPs in an adult twin sample.

Authors:  Anna Weinberg; Noah C Venables; Greg Hajcak Proudfit; Christopher J Patrick
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Tracking neural correlates of successful learning over repeated sequence observations.

Authors:  Natalie A Steinemann; Clara Moisello; M Felice Ghilardi; Simon P Kelly
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Encoding dynamics in free recall: Examining attention allocation with pupillometry.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Ashley L Miller
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-01

8.  Age, physical fitness, and attention: P3a and P3b.

Authors:  Matthew B Pontifex; Charles H Hillman; John Polich
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2009-01-26       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Affective ERP processing in a visual oddball task: arousal, valence, and gender.

Authors:  Bella Rozenkrants; John Polich
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Repeated stimuli elicit diminished high-gamma electrocorticographic responses.

Authors:  Anna Rodriguez Merzagora; Thomas J Coffey; Michael R Sperling; Ashwini Sharan; Brian Litt; Gordon Baltuch; Joshua Jacobs
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.