Literature DB >> 26193875

Does the isolation effect require attention?

Tamra J Bireta1, Colleen M Mazzei2.   

Abstract

An item that differs from the surrounding items is remembered better than an item that is consistent with its surroundings; this is known as the von Restorff effect or isolation effect (von Restorff, Psychologische Forschung, 18, 299-342, 1933). Theoretical explanations have proposed that the isolate is processed differently from control items, though some research has suggested that this processing might require more attention for semantic than for physical isolates. To test this possibility, in the present study we examined the isolation effects for physical isolates and semantic isolates under full and divided attention. Participants viewed lists of categorized words, with some lists containing either a physical or a semantic isolate, followed by immediate written free recall. Across three experiments, divided attention eliminated the semantic isolation effect but did not impact the physical isolation effect. Furthermore, semantic isolates were output earlier in recall than controls, whereas physical isolates were output more similarly to controls. These findings suggest that semantic isolation effects require attention during encoding, whereas physical isolation effects are relatively automatic.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Distinctiveness; Divided attention; Isolation effect; Physical isolate; Semantic isolate

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26193875     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-015-0538-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  23 in total

1.  Is perceptual salience needed in explanations of the isolation effect?

Authors:  J Dunlosky; R R Hunt; E Clark
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  von Restorff revisited: isolation, generation, and memory for order.

Authors:  M R Kelley; J S Nairne
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Studies in incidental learning: I. The effects of crowding and isolation.

Authors:  L POSTMAN; L W PHILLIPS
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1954-07

Review 4.  Can we have a distinctive theory of memory?

Authors:  S R Schmidt
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1991-11

5.  The influence of age on memory for distinctive events.

Authors:  Lisa Geraci; Mark A McDaniel; Isabel Manzano; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-03

6.  The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory.

Authors:  F I Craik; R Govoni; M Naveh-Benjamin; N D Anderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1996-06

7.  Serial position and the Von Restorff isolation effect.

Authors:  R N Bone; L R Goulet
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1968-03

8.  Encoding processes and memory organization: a model of the von Restorff effect.

Authors:  M Fabiani; E Donchin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Presidential address, 1980. Surprise!...Surprise?

Authors:  E Donchin
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Retrieval failures in alcohol state-dependent learning.

Authors:  R C Petersen
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1977-12-19       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  2 in total

1.  Revisiting von Restorff's early isolation effect.

Authors:  Stephen R Schmidt; Constance R Schmidt
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-02

2.  The processing of images of biological threats in visual short-term memory.

Authors:  Philip T Quinlan; Yue Yue; Dale J Cohen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 5.349

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.