Literature DB >> 21880922

Dissociable effects of top-down and bottom-up attention during episodic encoding.

Melina R Uncapher1, J Benjamin Hutchinson, Anthony D Wagner.   

Abstract

It is well established that the formation of memories for life's experiences-episodic memory-is influenced by how we attend to those experiences, yet the neural mechanisms by which attention shapes episodic encoding are still unclear. We investigated how top-down and bottom-up attention contribute to memory encoding of visual objects in humans by manipulating both types of attention during fMRI of episodic memory formation. We show that dorsal parietal cortex-specifically, intraparietal sulcus (IPS)-was engaged during top-down attention and was also recruited during the successful formation of episodic memories. By contrast, bottom-up attention engaged ventral parietal cortex-specifically, temporoparietal junction (TPJ)-and was also more active during encoding failure. Functional connectivity analyses revealed further dissociations in how top-down and bottom-up attention influenced encoding: while both IPS and TPJ influenced activity in perceptual cortices thought to represent the information being encoded (fusiform/lateral occipital cortex), they each exerted opposite effects on memory encoding. Specifically, during a preparatory period preceding stimulus presentation, a stronger drive from IPS was associated with a higher likelihood that the subsequently attended stimulus would be encoded. By contrast, during stimulus processing, stronger connectivity with TPJ was associated with a lower likelihood the stimulus would be successfully encoded. These findings suggest that during encoding of visual objects into episodic memory, top-down and bottom-up attention can have opposite influences on perceptual areas that subserve visual object representation, suggesting that one manner in which attention modulates memory is by altering the perceptual processing of to-be-encoded stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21880922      PMCID: PMC3172893          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0152-11.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  100 in total

1.  Assembling and encoding word representations: fMRI subsequent memory effects implicate a role for phonological control.

Authors:  Dav Clark; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Item- and task-level processes in the left inferior prefrontal cortex: positive and negative correlates of encoding.

Authors:  Jeremy R Reynolds; David I Donaldson; Anthony D Wagner; Todd S Braver
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation.

Authors:  K J Worsley; S Marrett; P Neelin; A C Vandal; K J Friston; A C Evans
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Voluntary orienting is dissociated from target detection in human posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  M Corbetta; J M Kincade; J M Ollinger; M P McAvoy; G L Shulman
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Effects of divided attention on fMRI correlates of memory encoding.

Authors:  Melina R Uncapher; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  The relationship between study processing and the effects of cue congruency at retrieval: fMRI support for transfer appropriate processing.

Authors:  Heekyeong Park; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex.

Authors:  R Malach; J B Reppas; R R Benson; K K Kwong; H Jiang; W A Kennedy; P J Ledden; T J Brady; B R Rosen; R B Tootell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Influence and limitations of popout in the selection of salient visual stimuli by area V4 neurons.

Authors:  Brittany E Burrows; Tirin Moore
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Top-down and bottom-up attention to memory: a hypothesis (AtoM) on the role of the posterior parietal cortex in memory retrieval.

Authors:  Elisa Ciaramelli; Cheryl L Grady; Morris Moscovitch
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Selecting for memory? The influence of selective attention on the mnemonic binding of contextual information.

Authors:  Melina R Uncapher; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  46 in total

1.  Complementary role of frontoparietal activity and cortical pattern similarity in successful episodic memory encoding.

Authors:  Gui Xue; Qi Dong; Chuansheng Chen; Zhong-Lin Lu; Jeanette A Mumford; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Cortical reinstatement mediates the relationship between content-specific encoding activity and subsequent recollection decisions.

Authors:  Alan M Gordon; Jesse Rissman; Roozbeh Kiani; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Locus Coeruleus Activity Strengthens Prioritized Memories Under Arousal.

Authors:  David V Clewett; Ringo Huang; Rico Velasco; Tae-Ho Lee; Mara Mather
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Language as grist to the mill of cognition.

Authors:  Alexandros Tillas
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-05-16

5.  Expectations of Task Demands Dissociate Working Memory and Long-Term Memory Systems.

Authors:  T P Zanto; W C Clapp; M T Rubens; J Karlsson; A Gazzaley
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Neural correlates of the encoding of multimodal contextual features.

Authors:  Lauren J Gottlieb; Jenny Wong; Marianne de Chastelaine; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 2.460

7.  Differences in EEG power in young and mature healthy adults during an incidental/spatial learning task are related to age and execution efficiency.

Authors:  Elisa López-Loeza; Ana Rosa Rangel-Argueta; Miguel Ángel López-Vázquez; Miguel Cervantes; María Esther Olvera-Cortés
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2016-03-09

8.  Biased Competition during Long-term Memory Formation.

Authors:  J Benjamin Hutchinson; Sarah S Pak; Nicholas B Turk-Browne
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  The relationship between task-related and subsequent memory effects.

Authors:  Marianne de Chastelaine; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Conceptualizing Social Attention in Developmental Research.

Authors:  Brenda Salley; John Colombo
Journal:  Soc Dev       Date:  2015-12-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.