Literature DB >> 18062536

The influence of multiple readings on the missing-letter effect revisited.

Jean Saint-Aubin1, Anie Roy-Charland, Raymond M Klein.   

Abstract

In searching for a target letter while reading, participants make more omissions when the target letter is embedded in frequent function words than when it is embedded in less frequent content words. According to the guidance-organization (GO) model, this occurs because high-frequency function words are processed faster than low-frequency content words, leaving less time available for letter processing. We tested this hypothesis in three experiments by increasing word-processing speed through text repetition, which should translate into higher omission rates. Participants either read the text and searched for the target letter once or read the text three times and searched for a target letter on all readings or the final reading only. In all the experiments in which participants could not anticipate the target letter to be used, results revealed the presence of a large missing-letter effect that was unaffected by familiarity with the text. In addition, when participants knew from the start the target letter to be used on the final reading, the missing-letter effect was eliminated. Repeated search of the same text for different targets increased omissions equally for function words and content words, but this finding was present even when a new text was used, suggesting that repetition of the search task, rather than familiarity with the text, was responsible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18062536     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193492

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  26 in total

1.  The GO model: a reconsideration of the role of structural units in guiding and organizing text on line.

Authors:  Seth N Greenberg; Alice F Healy; Asher Koriat; Hamutal Kreiner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06

2.  One missing-letter effect: two methods of assessment.

Authors:  Jean Saint-Aubin; Raymond M Klein
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2004-03

3.  Trade-offs in detecting letters and comprehending text.

Authors:  William L Oliver; Alice F Healy; Ernest F Mross
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2005-09

4.  The interaction of word frequency and word class: a test of the GO model's account of the missing-letter effect.

Authors:  Annie Roy-Charland; Jean Saint-Aubin
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.143

5.  Detection errors onthe andand: Evidence for reading units larger than the word.

Authors:  A Drewnowski; A F Healy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1977-11

6.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.

Authors:  G R Loftus; M E Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

7.  Word frequency effects and eye movements during two readings of a text.

Authors:  G E Raney; K Rayner
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  1995-06

8.  Detecting phonemes and letters in text: interactions between different types and levels of processes.

Authors:  V I Schneider; A F Healy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1993-11

9.  Detection of Fs in a single statement: the role of phonetic recoding.

Authors:  J D Read
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1983-07

10.  Proofreading familiar text: constraints on visual processing.

Authors:  B A Levy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1983-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.