BACKGROUND: The biochemical test for osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) detects structural abnormalities in the helical region of type I collagen as delayed electrophoretic migration of alpha chains on SDS-urea-PAGE. Sensitivity of this test is based on overmodification of alpha chains in helices with a glycine substitution or other structural defect. The limits of detectability have not been reported. METHODS: We compared the collagen electrophoretic migration of 30 probands (types III or IV OI) with known mutations in the amino half of the alpha1(I) and alpha2(I) chains. Differences in sensitivity were examined by 5% and 6% SDS-urea-PAGE, and with respect to alpha chain, location along the chain, and substituting amino acid. RESULTS: Sensitivity was enhanced on 5% gels, and by examination of intracellular and secreted collagen. In alpha1(I), substitutions in the first 100 residues were not detectable; 7% of cases in the current Mutation Consortium database are in this region. alpha1(I) substitutions between residues 100 and 230 were variably detectable, while those after residue 232 were all detected. In alpha2(I), variability of electrophoretic detection extended through residue 436. About a third of cases in the Consortium database are located in the combined variable detection region. Biochemical sensitivity did not correlate with substituting residue. CONCLUSIONS: Complete testing of probands with normal type I collagen biochemical results requires supplementation by molecular analysis of cDNA or gDNA in the amino third of alpha1(I) and amino half of alpha2(I). Mutation detection in OI is important for counselling, reproductive decisions, exclusion of child abuse, and genotype-phenotype correlations.
BACKGROUND: The biochemical test for osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) detects structural abnormalities in the helical region of type I collagen as delayed electrophoretic migration of alpha chains on SDS-urea-PAGE. Sensitivity of this test is based on overmodification of alpha chains in helices with a glycine substitution or other structural defect. The limits of detectability have not been reported. METHODS: We compared the collagen electrophoretic migration of 30 probands (types III or IV OI) with known mutations in the amino half of the alpha1(I) and alpha2(I) chains. Differences in sensitivity were examined by 5% and 6% SDS-urea-PAGE, and with respect to alpha chain, location along the chain, and substituting amino acid. RESULTS: Sensitivity was enhanced on 5% gels, and by examination of intracellular and secreted collagen. In alpha1(I), substitutions in the first 100 residues were not detectable; 7% of cases in the current Mutation Consortium database are in this region. alpha1(I) substitutions between residues 100 and 230 were variably detectable, while those after residue 232 were all detected. In alpha2(I), variability of electrophoretic detection extended through residue 436. About a third of cases in the Consortium database are located in the combined variable detection region. Biochemical sensitivity did not correlate with substituting residue. CONCLUSIONS: Complete testing of probands with normal type I collagen biochemical results requires supplementation by molecular analysis of cDNA or gDNA in the amino third of alpha1(I) and amino half of alpha2(I). Mutation detection in OI is important for counselling, reproductive decisions, exclusion of child abuse, and genotype-phenotype correlations.
Authors: R K Saiki; D H Gelfand; S Stoffel; S J Scharf; R Higuchi; G T Horn; K B Mullis; H A Erlich Journal: Science Date: 1988-01-29 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Joan C Marini; Antonella Forlino; Wayne A Cabral; Aileen M Barnes; James D San Antonio; Sarah Milgrom; James C Hyland; Jarmo Körkkö; Darwin J Prockop; Anne De Paepe; Paul Coucke; Sofie Symoens; Francis H Glorieux; Peter J Roughley; Alan M Lund; Kaija Kuurila-Svahn; Heini Hartikka; Daniel H Cohn; Deborah Krakow; Monica Mottes; Ulrike Schwarze; Diana Chen; Kathleen Yang; Christine Kuslich; James Troendle; Raymond Dalgleish; Peter H Byers Journal: Hum Mutat Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 4.878
Authors: Nadia Garibaldi; Roberta Besio; Raymond Dalgleish; Simona Villani; Aileen M Barnes; Joan C Marini; Antonella Forlino Journal: Dis Model Mech Date: 2022-05-16 Impact factor: 5.732
Authors: Laura Bianchi; Assunta Gagliardi; Roberta Gioia; Roberta Besio; Chiara Tani; Claudia Landi; Maria Cipriano; Anna Gimigliano; Antonio Rossi; Joan C Marini; Antonella Forlino; Luca Bini Journal: J Proteomics Date: 2012-02-18 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Wayne A Cabral; Nadja Fratzl-Zelman; MaryAnn Weis; Joseph E Perosky; Adrienne Alimasa; Rachel Harris; Heeseog Kang; Elena Makareeva; Aileen M Barnes; Paul Roschger; Sergey Leikin; Klaus Klaushofer; Antonella Forlino; Peter S Backlund; David R Eyre; Kenneth M Kozloff; Joan C Marini Journal: Matrix Biol Date: 2020-02-26 Impact factor: 11.583
Authors: Charlotte Gistelinck; Ronald Y Kwon; Fransiska Malfait; Sofie Symoens; Matthew P Harris; Katrin Henke; Michael B Hawkins; Shannon Fisher; Patrick Sips; Brecht Guillemyn; Jan Willem Bek; Petra Vermassen; Hanna De Saffel; Paul Eckhard Witten; MaryAnn Weis; Anne De Paepe; David R Eyre; Andy Willaert; Paul J Coucke Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2018-08-06 Impact factor: 11.205