Literature DB >> 16882417

Early results of the use of acellular dermal allograft in type III paraesophageal hernia repair.

Gordon Wisbach1, Todd Peterson, David Thoman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Type III paraesophageal hernias are diaphragmatic defects with the risk of serious complications. High recurrence rates associated with primary suture repair are significantly improved with the use of a tension-free repair with prosthetic mesh. However, mesh in the hiatus is associated with multiple complications. A bio-engineered material from donated human tissue offers an attractive alternative material for hernia repair. This report is on the first series of laparoscopic type III paraesophageal hernia repairs with acellular dermal allografts (Allo-Derm, Lifecell Corporation, Branchburg, NJ) in 11 patients with follow-up evaluation.
METHODS: From August 2003 to June 2004, 11 patients underwent laparoscopic repair of type III paraesophageal hernias with acellular dermal allografts. Patients were evaluated postoperatively with a symptoms questionnaire and barium esophagram.
RESULTS: All patients were available for follow-up; however, 2 refused a barium esophagram. Average length of hospital stay was 3 days. Follow-up evaluation was at a mean interval of 1 year. Postoperatively, 9 of 11 patients reported no symptoms. Barium esophagram revealed one recurrence in an asymptomatic patient.
CONCLUSION: Type III paraesophageal hernia can be laparoscopically repaired successfully with acellular dermal allografts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16882417      PMCID: PMC3016123     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JSLS        ISSN: 1086-8089            Impact factor:   2.172


INTRODUCTION

Type III paraesophageal hernia (PEH) typically presents later in life and is thought to be an acquired condition. As the population ages, the prevalence of paraesophageal hernia will most likely rise. Pain, chronic blood loss, and the threat of incarceration have traditionally driven surgical repair. Recurrence rates of up to 44% have been reported with primary surgical repair.[1] This has led to the use of prosthetic reinforcement to achieve a strong, tension-free repair. And, in fact, multiple small series with variable means of follow-up have reported lower recurrence rates with a prosthesis.[2-4] However, the erosion of a plastic prosthesis into the esophagus, infection, and stricture have all been reported.[5,6] We hypothesized that the use of a biologic material may provide the strength of a prosthetic repair without the associated risks. We report on the use of a new acellular material to buttress the repair of the PEH defect in 11 patients.

METHODS

Eleven patients with PEH underwent elective laparoscopic repair by the senior author (DST) between August 2003 and June 2004. These were consecutive patients who were determined as needing prosthetic reinforcement at the time of surgery based on hiatal defects >5 cm in transverse diameter. Seven of the patients underwent reoperations involving prolonged dissection. Follow-up occurred postoperatively and again at a median interval of 1 year (range, 8 to 19 months) at which time a symptom questionnaire was administered and a barium esophagram obtained. Two patients refused radiographic follow-up but agreed to the questionnaire. Our technique was to dissect the hernia sac from the mediastinum beginning at the left crus and proceeding anteriorly to the right crus. The esophagus was completely mobilized into the mediastinum preserving the vagi; the hernia sac was then excised. The short gastric arteries were divided and the crura approximated by using interrupted 0 Ethibond sutures (Ethicon, Cincinnati, OH). AlloDerm (AlloDerm; Lifecell Corporation, Branchburg, NJ) material measuring 4×10 cm and cut into a Y-shape was then secured over the approximated crura by using 2-O Ethibond suture and 5-mm spiral tacks (. A second piece of 4x10-cm material bridging any remaining opening at the hiatus and reinforcing the crura was laid on top and secured primarily with 5-mm spiral tacks (. If there was significant crural separation, the AlloDerm was used as an interposition graft, rather than creating significant tension in the closure. A 360-degree fundoplication completed the repair; no sutures were used to anchor the wrap in the abdomen. AlloDerm cut into Y-shape secured over approximated crura. Second piece of AlloDerm as interposition graft, if needed.

RESULTS

All patients were available for follow-up; however, 2 refused a barium esophagram. Patient characteristics are provided in . There were no deaths and no complications except 1 case of gas bloat requiring NGT decompression. Average length of stay was 3 days (range, 1 to 6). Nine of the 11 patients reported excellent results with complete resolution of their symptoms following repair. One patient complained of mild dysphagia, and 1 remained on acid suppression for mild heartburn. Follow-up questionnaires at a mean interval of 1 year revealed that all patients were satisfied with the results of the operation ( Demographics, Prior Hiatal Surgery and Symptoms Outcome: Symptoms and Recurrence Barium esophagram revealed intact repairs in 8 of the 9 patients studied. One patient had partial reherniation of the fundoplication into the mediastinum, but was asymptomatic (. Partial reherniation of fundoplication into mediastinum in asymptomatic patient.

DISCUSSION

PEH are acquired diaphragmatic defects containing variable amounts of stomach, with or without other intraabdominal organs. These probably result from a combination of genetic weakness and stress over time. These hernias have a risk for serious complications, such as strangulation, necrosis, or gastric perforation, and when symptomatic should be repaired. Laparotomy or thoracotomy, or both, were the traditional approaches to repair, producing acceptable results but with high morbidity.[7,8] The transabdominal open approach has reported radiographic recurrence rates between 5% to 44%.[1,9] The laparoscopic approach is associated with less morbidity, but is technically challenging and some have questioned its durability. Hashemi et al[10] reported a 42% radiographic recurrence rate with primary laparoscopic repair versus 15% in those undergoing open repair. More recent laparoscopic series have reported better results, possibly as a result of the increased use of prosthetic reinforcement.[2-4] The thin attenuated crura often found with PEH would seem to require buttressing if recurrence is to be avoided. There is convincing evidence from hernia defects elsewhere in the body that better results are achieved when a tension-free repair with prosthetic reinforcement is used. Frantzides[3] has reported the only randomized trial of suture repair versus prosthetic closure using polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) in PEH over 8 cm. There was a 22% recurrence rate with primary repair versus none in the PTFE group. The hiatal defect is unique in that it contains a hollow organ and is in constant motion. While plastic prosthetics have been used with excellent results, the risk of erosion is real and can be devastating.[5] In addition, plastic is at risk for infection and has caused esophageal stricture.[6] Also many clinical situations exist in which the use of synthetic materials is suboptimal, such as in cases of immunocompromised patients, enterocutaneous fistulae, or recent intraabdominal infections. In these cases, if synthetic materials are used and become infected, then the prosthesis generally needs to be removed. Previous work in the rabbit model has shown that autologous thoracodorsal fascial grafts, when used for abdominal wall reconstruction, become revascularized, retain cellular architecture, and resist infection better than prosthetic material does.[11] Autologous fascial grafts, however, have limited supply and produce donor-site morbidity. Initial observational reports using porcine small intestine submucosa to repair large paraesophageal defects have been published.[12,13] AlloDerm is an acellular dermal matrix processed from banked human cadaver skin with favorable in vivo characteristics. In-growth of fibroblasts, neovascularization, and subsequent collagen production has been demonstrated in histiologic studies of AlloDerm grafts 6 months after implantaion.[14] This material is efficacious in a variety of applications, including burns,[15] periodontal disease,[16] as a soft tissue filler,[17] and for dural replacement.[18] AlloDerm has been shown to function at least as effectively as Gore-Tex in ventral hernia repair in the rabbit model.[19] Its favorable handling characteristics and extreme pliability once rehydrated suggest that it may be less prone to erode into the esophagus than other materials.

CONCLUSION

Our study found that laparoscopic repair with an AlloDerm graft as a reinforcing patch over the hiatal closure was effective in PEH repair. Patients undergoing the procedure reported excellent symptom relief with a low radiographic recurrence rate. Repeat radiographic evaluation is planned at 5 years to evaluate longer-term results.
Table 1.

Demographics, Prior Hiatal Surgery and Symptoms

Median age, y (range)41 (26–60)
Male:Female9:2
Prior hiatal surgery7
    PEH repair only1
    Fundoplication only4
    Both2
Symptoms
    Heartburn9
    Dysphagia6
    Regurgitation5
    Post prandial pain3
    Early satiety3
    Bloating2
Table 2.

Outcome: Symptoms and Recurrence

SymptomsRecurrence
None91
Mild20
Severe00
  17 in total

1.  Small intestinal submucosa for laparoscopic repair of large paraesophageal hiatal hernias: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Paul S Strange
Journal:  Surg Technol Int       Date:  2003

2.  Laparoscopic repair of large type III hiatal hernia: objective followup reveals high recurrence rate.

Authors:  M Hashemi; J H Peters; T R DeMeester; J E Huprich; M Quek; J A Hagen; P F Crookes; J Theisen; S R DeMeester; L F Sillin; C G Bremner
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  A prospective, randomized trial of laparoscopic polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) patch repair vs simple cruroplasty for large hiatal hernia.

Authors:  Constantine T Frantzides; Atul K Madan; Mark A Carlson; George P Stavropoulos
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2002-06

4.  A 32-year experience in 100 patients with giant paraesophageal hernia: the case for abdominal approach and selective antireflux repair.

Authors:  A S Geha; M G Massad; N J Snow; A E Baue
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Mesh crural repair of large paraesophageal hiatal hernias.

Authors:  T T Hui; D S Thoman; M Spyrou; E H Phillips; T David
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 0.688

6.  The use of small intestine submucosa in the repair of paraesophageal hernias: initial observations of a new technique.

Authors:  Brant K Oelschlager; Marco Barreca; Lily Chang; Carlos A Pellegrini
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  A 25-year experience with open primary transthoracic repair of paraesophageal hiatal hernia.

Authors:  Himanshu J Patel; Bethany B Tan; John Yee; Mark B Orringer; Mark D Iannettoni
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia with selective use of mesh.

Authors:  Andrei Keidar; Amir Szold
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.719

9.  Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair with mesh.

Authors:  D S Edelman
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1995-02

10.  Revascularization of human acellular dermis in full-thickness abdominal wall reconstruction in the rabbit model.

Authors:  Nathan G Menon; Eduardo D Rodriguez; Colman K Byrnes; John A Girotto; Nelson H Goldberg; Ronald P Silverman
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.539

View more
  12 in total

1.  Biologic hernia implants in experimental intraperitoneal onlay mesh plasty repair: the impact of proprietary collagen processing methods and fibrin sealant application on tissue integration.

Authors:  A H Petter-Puchner; R H Fortelny; K Silic; J Brand; S Gruber-Blum; H Redl
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-04-30       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Mesh in laparoscopic large hiatal hernia repair: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Edgar Furnée; Eric Hazebroek
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Paraesophageal hernia repair with biomesh does not increase postoperative dysphagia.

Authors:  Trudie A Goers; Maria A Cassera; Christy M Dunst; Lee L Swanström
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Long-term outcome of cruroplasty reinforcement with human acellular dermal matrix in large paraesophageal hiatal hernia.

Authors:  Yong Kwon Lee; Elaine James; Victor Bochkarev; Michelle Vitamvas; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Allograft dermal matrix hiatoplasty during laparoscopic primary fundoplication, paraesophageal hernia repair, and reoperation for failed hiatal hernia repair.

Authors:  Reginald C W Bell; Jacqueline Fearon; Katherine D Freeman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair with acellular dermal matrix cruroplasty.

Authors:  Dennis F Diaz; J Scott Roth
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2011 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

7.  Functional Results after Repair of Large Hiatal Hernia by Use of a Biologic Mesh.

Authors:  Filimon Antonakis; Ferdinand Köckerling; Friedrich Kallinowski
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2016-03-09

8.  Preliminary study of hiatal hernia repair using polyglycolic acid: trimethylene carbonate mesh.

Authors:  James M Massullo; Tejinder P Singh; Ward J Dunnican; Brian R Binetti
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2012 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

9.  Different tissue reaction of oesophagus and diaphragm after mesh hiatoplasty. Results of an animal study.

Authors:  Jens Otto; Daniel Kämmer; Petra Lynen Jansen; Michael Anurov; Svetlana Titkova; Alexander Ottinger; Raphael Rosch; Volker Schumpelick; Marc Jansen
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2008-04-12       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 10.  The Use of Biological Meshes in Diaphragmatic Defects - An Evidence-Based Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Stavros A Antoniou; Rudolph Pointner; Frank-Alexander Granderath; Ferdinand Köckerling
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2015-10-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.