Literature DB >> 15975383

Open repair of paraesophageal hernia: reassessment of subjective and objective outcomes.

Donald E Low1, Trisha Unger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical repair of paraesophageal hernias (PEH) remains a challenging operation. Increasing numbers of patients are undergoing laparoscopic repair. This series provides an up-to-date benchmark of the results of open repair of PEH to compare with current laparoscopic series.
METHODS: All patients undergoing surgical repair of PEH by a single surgeon between April 1996 and November 2001 were included. Follow-up included postoperative SF-36 survey and objective reassessment (barium swallow or endoscopy) at a mean of 29.8 months.
RESULTS: Seventy-two consecutive patients (mean age, 68.7 years) presented with large PEH. Presenting symptoms included heartburn (60%), dysphagia (43%), chest pain (42%), anemia (39%), and dyspnea (32%). Surgical treatment involved transabdominal open repair including sac excision, crural closure (primary closure 98.6%), and antireflux procedure (Hill procedure, 96%; Nissen fundoplication, 4%). No patient required a Collis procedure. Postoperative assessment (subjective, 97%; objective, 88%) was prospective. Median operative length was 155 minutes. Median length of stay was 4.5 days (range, 3 to 12 days). Postoperative complications occurred in 17 of 72 patients (23.6%), but no patient sustained intraoperative or postoperative visceral injuries. In-hospital and 30-day mortality was zero. Heartburn and dysphagia symptom scores demonstrated significant improvement (p < 0.001). Postoperative SF-36 scores demonstrated levels better than the general population (six of eight categories) and better than the age-matched population (eight of eight categories). Objective follow-up demonstrated recurrent hernias in 11 patients (18%). Most of these recurrences (73%) were less than 2-cm sliding hernias, and no patients required revisional surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of open repair of PEH have continued to evolve in the same time that has seen the introduction of laparoscopic PEH repairs. Results with the open approach in the modern era can provide excellent outcomes, which are comparable to and in some measures exceed those obtained with the laparoscopic approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15975383     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.02.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  13 in total

1.  Guidelines for the management of hiatal hernia.

Authors:  Geoffrey Paul Kohn; Raymond Richard Price; Steven R DeMeester; Jörg Zehetner; Oliver J Muensterer; Ziad Awad; Sumeet K Mittal; William S Richardson; Dimitrios Stefanidis; Robert D Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Recurrence after composite repair of a giant hiatus hernia: 'the golf club' deformity is a distinctive clinical and radiological picture.

Authors:  R V Furtado; G L Falk; S J Vivian
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Minimally Invasive Surgery Should Be the Standard of Care for Paraesophageal Hernia Repair.

Authors:  Francisco Schlottmann; Paula D Strassle; Timothy M Farrell; Marco G Patti
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Beyond Belsey: complex laparoscopic hiatus and diaphragmatic hernia repair.

Authors:  D Zanotti; C Fiorani; A Botha
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Novel combined VATS/laparoscopic approach for giant and complicated paraesophageal hernia repair: description of technique and early results.

Authors:  Daniela Molena; Benedetto Mungo; Miloslawa Stem; Anne O Lidor
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernias: a Canadian experience.

Authors:  Robin P Boushey; Husein Moloo; Stephen Burpee; Christopher M Schlachta; Eric C Poulin; Fatima Haggar; Daniel C Trottier; Joseph Mamazza
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  A population-based analysis of emergent vs. elective hospital admissions for an intrathoracic stomach.

Authors:  Marek Polomsky; Rui Hu; Boris Sepesi; Matthew O'Connor; Xing Qui; Daniel P Raymond; Virginia R Litle; Carolyn E Jones; Thomas J Watson; Jeffrey H Peters
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Open versus laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair.

Authors:  Terrence M Fullum; Tolulope A Oyetunji; Gezzer Ortega; Daniel D Tran; Ian M Woods; Olusola Obayomi-Davies; Orighomisan Pessu; Stephanie R Downing; Edward E Cornwell
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2013 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

9.  Early results of the use of acellular dermal allograft in type III paraesophageal hernia repair.

Authors:  Gordon Wisbach; Todd Peterson; David Thoman
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2006 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

10.  Preliminary study of hiatal hernia repair using polyglycolic acid: trimethylene carbonate mesh.

Authors:  James M Massullo; Tejinder P Singh; Ward J Dunnican; Brian R Binetti
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2012 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.