Literature DB >> 12819496

Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia with selective use of mesh.

Andrei Keidar1, Amir Szold.   

Abstract

The laparoscopic approach to PEH, in use for close to a decade, shows promising results. However, data on the long-term follow-up of patients who undergo this procedure are still lacking, and the use of mesh is debatable. We retrospectively investigated 33 patients who underwent this procedure over a 30-month period. In 10 patients, the repair was performed using a mesh prosthesis. There was one (3%) intraoperative and four (12%) early postoperative complications, with one mortality (3%). The average postoperative stay was 3 days. During a 58-month follow-up period, 18% of the patients developed small, sliding recurrent hernias, with a higher rate in the primary repair group (18% vs. 10%). Surgical outcome was scored good-to-excellent on a questionnaire by 84.5% of the patients. Laparoscopic repair of PEH is feasible and safe. While small recurrences do occur, functional results remain good. The use of mesh should be tailored to the specific patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12819496     DOI: 10.1097/00129689-200306000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech        ISSN: 1530-4515            Impact factor:   1.719


  25 in total

1.  Mesh-reinforced hiatal hernia repair.

Authors:  M A Carlson; C T Frantzides
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Laparoscopic mesh hiatoplasty for paraesophageal hernias and fundoplications: a critical analysis of the available literature.

Authors:  J M Johnson; A M Carbonell; B J Carmody; M K Jamal; J W Maher; J M Kellum; E J DeMaria
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair: long-term outcome with the focus on the influence of mesh reinforcement.

Authors:  B P Müller-Stich; F Holzinger; T Kapp; C Klaiber
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-01-21       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Gasless laparoscopic surgery plus abdominal wall lifting for giant hiatal hernia-our single-center experience.

Authors:  Jiang-Hong Yu; Ji-Xiang Wu; Lei Yu; Jian-Ye Li
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2016-12-07

5.  Long-term outcomes of cruroplasty reinforcement with composite versus biologic mesh for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Bin Wang; Wei Zhang; Cheng-Xiang Shan; Sheng Liu; Zhi-Guo Jiang; Ming Qiu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Histologic results 1 year after bioprosthetic repair of paraesophageal hernia in a canine model.

Authors:  K M Desai; S Diaz; I G Dorward; E R Winslow; M C La Regina; V Halpin; N J Soper
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Severe complication of laparoscopic mesh hiatoplasty for paraesophageal hernia.

Authors:  Nico Zügel; Reinhold A Lang; Martin Kox; Thomas P Hüttl
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Evaluation of lightweight titanium-coated polypropylene mesh (TiMesh) for laparoscopic repair of large hiatal hernias.

Authors:  Eric J Hazebroek; Ada Ng; David H K Yong; Hayley Berry; Steven Leibman; Garett S Smith
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Do recurrences after paraesophageal hernia repair matter? : Ten-year follow-up after laparoscopic repair.

Authors:  B C White; L O Jeansonne; C B Morgenthal; S Zagorski; S S Davis; C D Smith; E Lin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernias: a Canadian experience.

Authors:  Robin P Boushey; Husein Moloo; Stephen Burpee; Christopher M Schlachta; Eric C Poulin; Fatima Haggar; Daniel C Trottier; Joseph Mamazza
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.089

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.