Literature DB >> 22119529

Visual motion and the perception of surface material.

Katja Doerschner1, Roland W Fleming, Ozgur Yilmaz, Paul R Schrater, Bruce Hartung, Daniel Kersten.   

Abstract

Many critical perceptual judgments, from telling whether fruit is ripe to determining whether the ground is slippery, involve estimating the material properties of surfaces. Very little is known about how the brain recognizes materials, even though the problem is likely as important for survival as navigating or recognizing objects. Though previous research has focused nearly exclusively on the properties of static images, recent evidence suggests that motion may affect the appearance of surface material. However, what kind of information motion conveys and how this information may be used by the brain is still unknown. Here, we identify three motion cues that the brain could rely on to distinguish between matte and shiny surfaces. We show that these motion measurements can override static cues, leading to dramatic changes in perceived material depending on the image motion characteristics. A classifier algorithm based on these cues correctly predicts both successes and some striking failures of human material perception. Together these results reveal a previously unknown use for optic flow in the perception of surface material properties.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22119529      PMCID: PMC3246380          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.10.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  22 in total

1.  A tropical horde of counterfeit predator eyes.

Authors:  Daniel H Janzen; Winnie Hallwachs; John M Burns
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Disparity, motion, and color information improve gloss constancy performance.

Authors:  Gunnar Wendt; Franz Faul; Vebjørn Ekroll; Rainer Mausfeld
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Specular reflections and the perception of shape.

Authors:  Roland W Fleming; Antonio Torralba; Edward H Adelson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2004-09-23       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  How direction of illumination affects visually perceived surface roughness.

Authors:  Yun-Xian Ho; Michael S Landy; Laurence T Maloney
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-05-05       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Image statistics and the perception of surface qualities.

Authors:  Isamu Motoyoshi; Shin'ya Nishida; Lavanya Sharan; Edward H Adelson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Image statistics do not explain the perception of gloss and lightness.

Authors:  Barton L Anderson; Juno Kim
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  The role of brightness and orientation congruence in the perception of surface gloss.

Authors:  Phillip Marlow; Juno Kim; Barton L Anderson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Discerning nonrigid 3D shapes from motion cues.

Authors:  Anshul Jain; Qasim Zaidi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Integration of direction signals of image motion in the superior temporal sulcus of the macaque monkey.

Authors:  H Saito; M Yukie; K Tanaka; K Hikosaka; Y Fukada; E Iwai
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  fMR-adaptation reveals separate processing regions for the perception of form and texture in the human ventral stream.

Authors:  Jonathan S Cant; Stephen R Arnott; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  27 in total

1.  Naturally glossy: Gloss perception, illumination statistics, and tone mapping.

Authors:  Wendy J Adams; Gizem Kucukoglu; Michael S Landy; Rafal K Mantiuk
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Frequency-based heuristics for material perception.

Authors:  Martin Giesel; Qasim Zaidi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Key characteristics of specular stereo.

Authors:  Alexander A Muryy; Roland W Fleming; Andrew E Welchman
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Specular reflections and the estimation of shape from binocular disparity.

Authors:  Alexander A Muryy; Andrew E Welchman; Andrew Blake; Roland W Fleming
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Accuracy and speed of material categorization in real-world images.

Authors:  Lavanya Sharan; Ruth Rosenholtz; Edward H Adelson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 6.  The Certainty of Ambiguity in Visual Neural Representations.

Authors:  Jan W Brascamp; Steven K Shevell
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 7.745

7.  Enhancement of glossiness perception by retinal-image motion: additional effect of head-yoked motion parallax.

Authors:  Yusuke Tani; Keisuke Araki; Takehiro Nagai; Kowa Koida; Shigeki Nakauchi; Michiteru Kitazaki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Eleven-month-old infants infer differences in the hardness of object surfaces from observation of penetration events.

Authors:  Tomoko Imura; Tomohiro Masuda; Nobu Shirai; Yuji Wada
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-03

9.  fMRI evidence for areas that process surface gloss in the human visual cortex.

Authors:  Hua-Chun Sun; Hiroshi Ban; Massimiliano Di Luca; Andrew E Welchman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Human visual cortical responses to specular and matte motion flows.

Authors:  Tae-Eui Kam; Damien J Mannion; Seong-Whan Lee; Katja Doerschner; Daniel J Kersten
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.