Literature DB >> 19130903

Operations and pelvic muscle training in the management of apical support loss (OPTIMAL) trial: design and methods.

Matthew D Barber1, Linda Brubaker, Shawn Menefee, Peggy Norton, Diane Borello-France, Edward Varner, Joseph Schaffer, Alison Weidner, Xiao Xu, Cathie Spino, Anne Weber.   

Abstract

The primary aims of this trial are: 1) to compare surgical outcomes following sacrospinous ligament fixation to uterosacral vaginal vault suspension in women undergoing vaginal surgery for apical or uterine pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence and 2) to examine the effects of a structured perioperative program consisting of behavioral techniques and pelvic floor muscle training compared to usual care. This trial is performed through the Pelvic Floor Disorders Network (PFDN), which is funded by National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Subjects will be enrolled from hospitals associated with seven PFDN clinical centers across the United States. A centralized biostatistical coordinating center will oversee data collection and analysis. Two approaches will be investigated simultaneously using a 2x2 randomized factorial design: a surgical intervention (sacrospinous ligament fixation versus uterosacral vaginal vault suspension) and a perioperative behavioral intervention (behavioral and pelvic floor muscle training versus usual care). Surgeons have standardized essential components of each surgical procedure and have met specific standards of expertise. Providers of the behavioral intervention have undergone standardized training. Anatomic, functional, and health-related quality of life outcomes will be assessed using validated measures by researchers blinded to all randomization assignments. Cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed using prospectively collected data on health care costs and resource utilization. The primary surgical endpoint is a composite outcome defined by anatomic recurrence, recurrence of bothersome vaginal prolapse symptoms and/or retreatment and will be assessed 2 years after the index surgery. Endpoints for the behavioral intervention include both short-term (6-month) improvement in urinary symptoms and long-term (2-year) improvement in anatomic outcomes and prolapse symptoms. This article describes the rationale and design of this randomized trial, focusing on several key design features of potential interest to researchers in the field of female pelvic floor disorders and others conducting randomized surgical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19130903      PMCID: PMC2646798          DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2008.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  65 in total

1.  Transvaginal culdosuspension: technique and results.

Authors:  C V Comiter; S P Vasavada; S Raz
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  A test for the difference between two treatments in a continuous measure of outcome when there are dropouts.

Authors:  M B Brown
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1992-06

3.  Surgical management and prevention of vaginal vault prolapse.

Authors:  E Imparato; G Aspesi; E Rovetta; M Presti
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1992-09

4.  Introduction of newer surgical prostheses and procedures in pelvic reconstruction: a challenge for pelvic surgeons.

Authors:  Mat H Ho; Narender N Bhatia
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.927

Review 5.  Anatomy and biomechanics of genital prolapse.

Authors:  J O DeLancey
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.190

6.  A digital test for pelvic muscle strength in women with urinary incontinence.

Authors:  C A Brink; T J Wells; C M Sampselle; E R Taillie; R Mayer
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  1994 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Preoperative and postoperative analysis of site-specific pelvic support defects in 81 women treated with sacrospinous ligament suspension and pelvic reconstruction.

Authors:  B L Shull; C V Capen; M W Riggs; T J Kuehl
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Structural support of the urethra as it relates to stress urinary incontinence: the hammock hypothesis.

Authors:  J O DeLancey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  The role of apical vaginal support in the appearance of anterior and posterior vaginal prolapse.

Authors:  Jerry L Lowder; Amy J Park; Rennique Ellison; Chiara Ghetti; Pamela Moalli; Halina Zyczynski; Anne M Weber
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Validation of a severity index in female urinary incontinence and its implementation in an epidemiological survey.

Authors:  H Sandvik; S Hunskaar; A Seim; R Hermstad; A Vanvik; H Bratt
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.710

View more
  25 in total

1.  Validation of the activities assessment scale in women undergoing pelvic reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Matthew D Barber; Kim Kenton; Nancy K Janz; Yvonne Hsu; Keisha Y Dyer; W Jerod Greer; Amanda White; Susie Meikle; Wen Ye
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.091

2.  Validation of the surgical pain scales in women undergoing pelvic reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Matthew D Barber; Nancy Janz; Kim Kenton; Yvonne Hsu; W Jerod Greer; Keisha Dyer; Amanda White; Susan Meikle; Wen Ye
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.091

Review 3.  Peri-operative physiotherapy to prevent recurrent symptoms and treatment following prolapse surgery: supported by evidence or not?

Authors:  Marielle M E Lakeman; Steven E Schraffordt Koops; Bary C Berghmans; Jan Paul W R Roovers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Comparison of 2 transvaginal surgical approaches and perioperative behavioral therapy for apical vaginal prolapse: the OPTIMAL randomized trial.

Authors:  Matthew D Barber; Linda Brubaker; Kathryn L Burgio; Holly E Richter; Ingrid Nygaard; Alison C Weidner; Shawn A Menefee; Emily S Lukacz; Peggy Norton; Joseph Schaffer; John N Nguyen; Diane Borello-France; Patricia S Goode; Sharon Jakus-Waldman; Cathie Spino; Lauren Klein Warren; Marie G Gantz; Susan F Meikle
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Association between adjuvant posterior repair and success of native tissue apical suspension.

Authors:  Gary Sutkin; Halina M Zyczynski; Amaanti Sridhar; J Eric Jelovsek; Charles R Rardin; Donna Mazloomdoost; David D Rahn; John N Nguyen; Uduak U Andy; Isuzu Meyer; Marie G Gantz
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Pain and activity after vaginal reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Matthew D Barber; Linda Brubaker; Ingrid Nygaard; Clifford Y Wai; Keisha Y Dyer; David Ellington; Amaanti Sridhar; Marie G Gantz
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Concomitant Anterior Repair, Preoperative Prolapse Severity, and Anatomic Prolapse Outcomes After Vaginal Apical Procedures.

Authors:  Charles W Nager; Cara L Grimes; Tracy L Nolen; Clifford Y Wai; Linda Brubaker; Peter C Jeppson; Tracey S Wilson; Anthony G Visco; Matthew D Barber; Gary Sutkin; Peggy Norton; Charles R Rardin; Lily Arya; Dennis Wallace; Susan F Meikle
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 2.091

8.  Recruitment and retention: A randomized controlled trial of video-enhanced versus standard consent processes within the E-OPTIMAL study.

Authors:  Linda Brubaker; J Eric Jelovsek; Emily S Lukacz; Sunil Balgobin; Alicia Ballard; Alison C Weidner; Marie G Gantz; Ryan Whitworth; Donna Mazloomdoost
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 2.486

9.  Effect of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension vs Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation With or Without Perioperative Behavioral Therapy for Pelvic Organ Vaginal Prolapse on Surgical Outcomes and Prolapse Symptoms at 5 Years in the OPTIMAL Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  J Eric Jelovsek; Matthew D Barber; Linda Brubaker; Peggy Norton; Marie Gantz; Holly E Richter; Alison Weidner; Shawn Menefee; Joseph Schaffer; Norma Pugh; Susan Meikle
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Defining success after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Matthew D Barber; Linda Brubaker; Ingrid Nygaard; Thomas L Wheeler; Joeseph Schaffer; Zhen Chen; Cathie Spino
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 7.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.