PURPOSE: Using the raw data from coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography, multislice CT (MSCT) can be used to evaluate cardiac function. However, the accuracy of left ventricular (LV) wall motion assessment by MSCT has not been thoroughly investigated. We investigated whether 16-channel MSCT could accurately assess LV wall motion by comparing its results with those of conventional biplane left ventriculography (LVG). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 20 patients with various kinds of heart disease. All patients underwent both contrast-enhanced MSCT and biplane LVG. Using a retrospective electrocardiography-gating technique, 10 phases over one cardiac cycle were extracted. The left ventricle was divided into seven segments according to the American Heart Association classification. Wall motion was scored as follows: 1, normal; 2, mild to moderate hypokinesis; 3, severe hypokinesis; 4, akinesis; 5, dyskinesis; and 6, aneurysm. The scores obtained by MSCT were compared with those obtained by LVG. The wall motion scores were analyzed using the chi-squared independence test (6 x 6 contingency table). RESULTS: Wall motion could be assessed in all segments of the 20 patients using interactive multiplanar animation. Among a total of 140 segments in 20 patients, scores in 118 were concordant between MSCT and LVG (118/140, 84.3%). CONCLUSION: The 16-MSCT can accurately assess LV wall motion.
PURPOSE: Using the raw data from coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography, multislice CT (MSCT) can be used to evaluate cardiac function. However, the accuracy of left ventricular (LV) wall motion assessment by MSCT has not been thoroughly investigated. We investigated whether 16-channel MSCT could accurately assess LV wall motion by comparing its results with those of conventional biplane left ventriculography (LVG). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 20 patients with various kinds of heart disease. All patients underwent both contrast-enhanced MSCT and biplane LVG. Using a retrospective electrocardiography-gating technique, 10 phases over one cardiac cycle were extracted. The left ventricle was divided into seven segments according to the American Heart Association classification. Wall motion was scored as follows: 1, normal; 2, mild to moderate hypokinesis; 3, severe hypokinesis; 4, akinesis; 5, dyskinesis; and 6, aneurysm. The scores obtained by MSCT were compared with those obtained by LVG. The wall motion scores were analyzed using the chi-squared independence test (6 x 6 contingency table). RESULTS: Wall motion could be assessed in all segments of the 20 patients using interactive multiplanar animation. Among a total of 140 segments in 20 patients, scores in 118 were concordant between MSCT and LVG (118/140, 84.3%). CONCLUSION: The 16-MSCT can accurately assess LV wall motion.
Authors: S Achenbach; S Ulzheimer; U Baum; M Kachelriess; D Ropers; T Giesler; W Bautz; W G Daniel; W A Kalender; W Moshage Journal: Circulation Date: 2000-12-05 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: S Achenbach; T Giesler; D Ropers; S Ulzheimer; H Derlien; C Schulte; E Wenkel; W Moshage; W Bautz; W G Daniel; W A Kalender; U Baum Journal: Circulation Date: 2001-05-29 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: A F Kopp; S Schroeder; A Kuettner; A Baumbach; C Georg; R Kuzo; M Heuschmid; B Ohnesorge; K R Karsch; C D Claussen Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: J J Bax; H Lamb; P Dibbets; H Pelikan; E Boersma; E P Viergever; G Germano; H W Vliegen; A de Roos; E K Pauwels; E E Van der Wall Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2000-12-15 Impact factor: 2.778