Literature DB >> 11113402

Comparison of gated single-photon emission computed tomography with magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of left ventricular function in ischemic cardiomyopathy.

J J Bax1, H Lamb, P Dibbets, H Pelikan, E Boersma, E P Viergever, G Germano, H W Vliegen, A de Roos, E K Pauwels, E E Van der Wall.   

Abstract

To perform a head-to-head comparison between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and gated single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for the evaluation of left ventricular (LV) function (LV ejection fraction [LVEF], LV volumes, and regional wall motion) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, we studied 22 patients with chronic coronary artery disease and LV dysfunction. Multislice, multiphase echoplanar MRI was performed with Philips Gyroscan ACS-NT15. Image analysis was performed using the MASS software package to determine LV end-systolic volume, LV end-diastolic volume, and LVEF. The same parameters were calculated using quantitative gated SPECT software (QGS, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center). The different parameters were compared using linear regression, and correlation coefficients were calculated. Regional wall motion was also determined from both techniques, according to a 13-segment model and a 3-point scoring system (from 1 = normokinesia to 3 = akinesia or dyskinesia). A summed wall motion score was also calculated for MRI and gated SPECT. Good correlations were found between MRI and gated SPECT for all parameters: (1) summed wall motion scoreMRI versus summed wall motion scoreSPECT: y = 0.74x + 8.0, r = 0.88, p <0.01; (2) LV end-systolic volumeMRI versus LV end-systolic volumeSPECT: y = 0.94x - 12.3, r = 0.87, p <0.01; (3) LV end-diastolic volumeMRI versus LV end-diastolic volumeSPECT: y = 0.93x - 18.4, r = 0.84, p <0.01; and (4) LVEFMRI versus LVEFSPECT: y = 0.97x + 0.68, r = 0.90, p <0.01. For regional wall motion, an exact agreement of 83% was found, with a kappa statistic of 0.77 (95% confidence intervals 0.71 to 0.83, SE 0.03), indicating essentially excellent agreement. Thus, close and significant correlations were observed for assessment of LVEF, LV volumes, and regional wall motion by MRI and gated SPECT in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11113402     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(00)01231-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  75 in total

1.  Evaluation of left ventricular endocardial volumes and ejection fractions computed from gated perfusion SPECT with magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of two methods.

Authors:  T L Faber; J P Vansant; R I Pettigrew; J R Galt; M Blais; G Chatzimavroudis; C D Cooke; R D Folks; S M Waldrop; E Gurtler-Krawczynska; M D Wittry; E V Garcia
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Validation of 4D-MSPECT and QGS for quantification of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction from gated 99mTc-MIBI SPET: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Claudia S A Lipke; Harald P Kühl; Bernd Nowak; Hans-Juergen Kaiser; Patrick Reinartz; Karl-Christian Koch; Udalrich Buell; Wolfgang M Schaefer
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-01-14       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  A realistic 3-D gated cardiac phantom for quality control of gated myocardial perfusion SPET: the Amsterdam gated (AGATE) cardiac phantom.

Authors:  Jacco J N Visser; Ellinor Busemann Sokole; Hein J Verberne; Jan B A Habraken; Huybert J F van de Stadt; Joris E N Jaspers; Morgan Shehata; Paul M Heeman; Berthe L F van Eck-Smit
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Prediction of long-term reverse left ventricular remodeling after revascularization or medical treatment in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy: a comparative study between SPECT and MRI.

Authors:  Tomas Skala; Martin Hutyra; Jan Vaclavik; Milan Kaminek; David Horak; Josef Novotny; Jana Zapletalova; Jan Lukl; Dan Marek; Milos Taborsky
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Differences in left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes measured at rest and poststress by gated sestamibi SPECT.

Authors:  Gautam Ramakrishna; Todd D Miller; David O Hodge; Michael K O'Connor; Raymond J Gibbons
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Assessment of left ventricular wall motion using 16-channel multislice computed tomography: comparison with left ventriculography.

Authors:  Toyoaki Haraikawa; Hiroshi Higashino; Yoshifumi Sugawara; Hitoshi Miki; Akira Kurata; Jitsuo Higaki; Teruhito Mochizuki
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2006-04

Review 7.  Gated SPECT in assessment of regional and global left ventricular function: major tool of modern nuclear imaging.

Authors:  Aiden Abidov; Guido Germano; Rory Hachamovitch; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Noninvasive modalities for the assessment of left ventricular function: all are equal but some are more equal than others.

Authors:  Tiong Keng Lim; Roxy Senior
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Quantitation in gated perfusion SPECT imaging: the Cedars-Sinai approach.

Authors:  Guido Germano; Paul B Kavanagh; Piotr J Slomka; Serge D Van Kriekinge; Geoff Pollard; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Atherosclerotic plaque imaging by PET/CT; can inactive, active and mixed plaques be discerned?

Authors:  E E van der Wall; J D Schuijf; J W Jukema; J J Bax; A van der Laarse
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.