Literature DB >> 23858055

Task-oriented comparison of power spectral density estimation methods for quantifying acoustic attenuation in diagnostic ultrasound using a reference phantom method.

Ivan M Rosado-Mendez1, Kibo Nam, Timothy J Hall, James A Zagzebski.   

Abstract

Reported here is a phantom-based comparison of methods for determining the power spectral density (PSD) of ultrasound backscattered signals. Those power spectral density values are then used to estimate parameters describing α(f), the frequency dependence of the acoustic attenuation coefficient. Phantoms were scanned with a clinical system equipped with a research interface to obtain radiofrequency echo data. Attenuation, modeled as a power law α(f)= α0 f (β), was estimated using a reference phantom method. The power spectral density was estimated using the short-time Fourier transform (STFT), Welch's periodogram, and Thomson's multitaper technique, and performance was analyzed when limiting the size of the parameter-estimation region. Errors were quantified by the bias and standard deviation of the α0 and β estimates, and by the overall power-law fit error (FE). For parameter estimation regions larger than ~34 pulse lengths (~1 cm for this experiment), an overall power-law FE of 4% was achieved with all spectral estimation methods. With smaller parameter estimation regions as in parametric image formation, the bias and standard deviation of the α0 and β estimates depended on the size of the parameter estimation region. Here, the multitaper method reduced the standard deviation of the α0 and β estimates compared with those using the other techniques. The results provide guidance for choosing methods for estimating the power spectral density in quantitative ultrasound methods.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attenuation; multitaper; power spectrum; reference phantom

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23858055      PMCID: PMC3879804          DOI: 10.1177/0161734613495524

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrason Imaging        ISSN: 0161-7346            Impact factor:   1.578


  54 in total

1.  Defining optimal axial and lateral resolution for estimating scatterer properties from volumes using ultrasound backscatter.

Authors:  Michael L Oelze; William D O'Brien
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Statistical uncertainty in ultrasonic backscatter and attenuation coefficients determined with a reference phantom.

Authors:  L X Yao; J A Zagzebski; E L Madsen
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Improved scatterer property estimates from ultrasound backscatter using gate-edge correction and a pseudo-Welch technique.

Authors:  Goutam Ghoshal; Michael L Oelze
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Improved scatterer property estimates from ultrasound backscatter for small gate lengths using a gate-edge correction factor.

Authors:  Michael L Oelze; William D O'Brien
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Impact of local attenuation approximations when estimating correlation length from backscattered ultrasound echoes.

Authors:  Timothy A Bigelow; William D O'Brien
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Attenuation estimation using spectral cross-correlation.

Authors:  Hyungsuk Kim; Tomy Varghese
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  Comparison of theoretical scattering results and ultrasonic data from clinical liver examinations.

Authors:  F L Lizzi; D L King; M C Rorke; J Hui; M Ostromogilsky; M M Yaremko; E J Feleppa; P Wai
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 8.  Correlation of ultrasonic attenuation with pathologic fat and fibrosis in liver disease.

Authors:  T Lin; J Ophir; G Potter
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Mean-scatterer spacing estimates with spectral correlation.

Authors:  T Varghese; K D Donohue
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Quantitative ultrasound imaging: in vivo results in normal liver.

Authors:  J A Zagzebski; Z F Lu; L X Yao
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 1.578

View more
  18 in total

1.  Low Variance Estimation of Backscatter Quantitative Ultrasound Parameters Using Dynamic Programming.

Authors:  Zara Vajihi; Ivan M Rosado-Mendez; Timothy J Hall; Hassan Rivaz
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  Modeling ultrasound attenuation in porous structures with mono-disperse random pore distributions using the independent scattering approximation: a 2D simulation study.

Authors:  Omid Yousefian; Yasamin Karbalaeisadegh; Marie Muller
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  A Quantitative Ultrasound-Based Multi-Parameter Classifier for Breast Masses.

Authors:  Haidy G Nasief; Ivan M Rosado-Mendez; James A Zagzebski; Timothy J Hall
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Quantitative Ultrasound Biomarkers Based on Backscattered Acoustic Power: Potential for Quantifying Remodeling of the Human Cervix during Pregnancy.

Authors:  Quinton W Guerrero; Helen Feltovich; Ivan M Rosado-Mendez; Lindsey C Carlson; Timothy J Hallcor
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Anisotropy and Spatial Heterogeneity in Quantitative Ultrasound Parameters: Relevance to the Study of the Human Cervix.

Authors:  Quinton W Guerrero; Helen Feltovich; Ivan M Rosado-Mendez; Lindsey C Carlson; Geng Li; Timothy J Hall
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Optimum Diffraction-Corrected Frequency-Shift Estimator of the Ultrasonic Attenuation Coefficient.

Authors:  Kayvan Samimi; Tomy Varghese
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  Quantifying Backscatter Anisotropy Using the Reference Phantom Method.

Authors:  Quinton W Guerrero; Ivan M Rosado-Mendez; Lindsey C Drehfal; Helen Feltovich; Timothy J Hall
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 2.725

8.  Attenuation Coefficient Parameter Computations for Tissue Composition Assessment of Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaque in Vivo.

Authors:  Catherine N Steffel; Shahriar Salamat; Thomas D Cook; Stephanie M Wilbrand; Robert J Dempsey; Carol C Mitchell; Tomy Varghese
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2020-04-11       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Scatterer number density considerations in reference phantom-based attenuation estimation.

Authors:  Nicholas Rubert; Tomy Varghese
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Acoustic Properties of Breast Fat.

Authors:  Haidy Gerges Nasief; Ivan M Rosado-Mendez; James A Zagzebski; Timothy J Hall
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 2.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.