Literature DB >> 16846499

The frequency of genes encoding three putative group B streptococcal virulence factors among invasive and colonizing isolates.

Shannon D Manning1, Moran Ki, Carl F Marrs, Kiersten J Kugeler, Stephanie M Borchardt, Carol J Baker, Betsy Foxman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Group B Streptococcus (GBS) causes severe infections in very young infants and invasive disease in pregnant women and adults with underlying medical conditions. GBS pathogenicity varies between and within serotypes, with considerable variation in genetic content between strains. Three proteins, Rib encoded by rib, and alpha and beta C proteins encoded by bca and bac, respectively, have been suggested as potential vaccine candidates for GBS. It is not known, however, whether these genes occur more frequently in invasive versus colonizing GBS strains.
METHODS: We screened 162 invasive and 338 colonizing GBS strains from different collections using dot blot hybridization to assess the frequency of bca, bac and rib. All strains were defined by serotyping for capsular type, and frequency differences were tested using the Chi square test.
RESULTS: Genes encoding the beta C protein (bac) and Rib (rib) occurred at similar frequencies among invasive and colonizing isolates, bac (20% vs. 23%), and rib (28% vs. 20%), while the alpha (bca) C protein was more frequently found in colonizing strains (46%) vs, invasive (29%). Invasive strains were associated with specific serotype/gene combinations.
CONCLUSION: Novel virulence factors must be identified to better understand GBS disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16846499      PMCID: PMC1559624          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-6-116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Infect Dis        ISSN: 1471-2334            Impact factor:   3.090


Background

Group B Streptococcus (GBS) causes sepsis and meningitis in young infants, febrile complications in pregnant women and invasive disease in adults with underlying medical conditions [1]. Capsular polysaccharide, which defines GBS serotype, is the primary virulence factor found in most GBS strains, and different serotypes contribute to disease in different populations. For example, 30% of GBS disease in non-pregnant adults is caused by serotype V [2], while serotype III causes more than 70% of infant meningitis and most late-onset (7–89 days of age) disease [3]. Vaccines currently under development target the most prevalent GBS serotypes [4]. Other than the polysaccharide capsule, little is known about other GBS components important in pathogenesis. Many putative virulence factors and genes have been identified recently (for a review see [5]), though most are either present in all GBS strains, or are lacking sufficient data to pinpoint their role in the pathogenic process. Three proteins, however, have been studied extensively and were recommended as potential GBS vaccine candidates [6-8]. These include the protein Rib [7] encoded by rib [9], and the alpha [10] and beta [10] C proteins encoded by bca [11] and bac [12], respectively. All three proteins trigger antibody production that offers protection from GBS infection in animal models [7,8,13], though the frequency of these proteins and the genes that encode them varies by disease status [14-19] as well as serotype. For example, Rib has been found predominantly in serotype III strains [7]. To date, large, population-based studies comparing the frequencies of genes encoding the Rib, alpha and beta C proteins among invasive and colonizing isolates have been limited.

Methods

We describe the frequency of genes encoding three virulence factors among five GBS strain collections including invasive (n = 162) and colonizing (n = 338) isolates (Table 1); invasive disease status was not known for 29 strains. All isolates tested were obtained with the approval of an appropriate institutional ethics committee. Invasive isolates originated from the blood or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of newborns <7 days of age (n = 100), the urine of college students (n = 4) [20,21] and pregnant women presenting to the University of Michigan Medical Center (UMMC) for prenatal care associated with GBS isolation from the urine (n = 58), and the placenta following delivery (n = 5) [22]. Newborn isolates, described by Zaleznik et al. [23] (n = 65), were collected between 1993 and 1996, while the remainder (n = 35) came from the same Houston hospitals between 1997 and 2000. Colonizing GBS isolates were from the anal orifice or urine of healthy male (n = 58) college students, the anal orifice, vagina, cervix or urine or healthy female (n = 86) college students [21], pregnant women from UMMC (n = 49) [22], and sexually active college women with a urinary tract infection not caused by GBS (n = 102) and their most recent male sex partner (n = 43) [20]. Among colonizing isolates, 17 (6.9%) were from individuals colonized with multiple isolates in multiple sites; the dot blot profile was determined only for those isolates that were unique by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) as described previously [20,21,24].
Table 1

Number of group B streptococcal isolates (n = 529) screened via dot blot hybridization and characteristics of each collection*.

GBS CollectionIsolation sourceCulture dateAge rangeRace/ethnicityNumber of strains
1a. Sexually active college women with UTI receiving care from a Student Health Services at the University of Michigan (UM) [22].urine, anal orifice, vaginalSept. 1996 to April 199918–30White (76%), Non-White (24%)Colonizing (n = 102), Invasive† (n = 2)
1b. Most recent male sex partner of women with UTI receiving care from the Student Health Services at UM [22].urine, anal orificeSept. 1996 to April 199918–35White (71%), Non-White (29%)Colonizing (n = 43), Invasive† (n = 0)
2a. Sexually active college women without UTI presenting to the Student Health Services at UM [22].urine, anal orifice, vaginalSept. 1996 to April 199918–28White (80%), Non-White (20%)Colonizing (n = 57), Invasive† (n = 0)
2b. Most recent male sex partner of women without UTI presenting to the Student Health Services at UM [22].urine, anal orificeSept. 1996 to April 199919–33White (73%), Non-White (27%)Colonizing (n = 35), Invasive† (n = 0)
3. Newborns with early onset disease from hospitals affiliated with Baylor College of Medicine [19].blood, CSF1993 to 2000< 7 daysHispanic (56%), African American (24%), Caucasian (16%), Asian (4%)Colonizing (n = 0), Invasive† (n = 100)
4a. Random sample of college aged women from the UM community [21]urine, anal orifice, vaginalSept. to Nov. 199817–49Caucasian (65%), Asian (16%), African American (10%), Hispanic (5%), Other (5%)Colonizing (n = 29), Invasive† (n = 1)
4b. Random sample of college aged men from the UM community [21]urine, anal orificeSept. to Nov. 199819–45Caucasian (60%), Asian (28%), African American (4%), Hispanic (3%), Other (4%)Colonizing (n = 23), Invasive† (n = 1)
5. Pregnant women presenting at the UM Medical Center for prenatal care [34].urine, rectal, vaginal, placentalAug. 1999 to Mar. 200016–42Caucasian (67%), African American (18%), Other (7%), Unknown (9%)Colonizing (n = 49), Invasive† (n = 53), Unknown (n = 29)

* Seventeen individuals (7 from collection 1a, 4 from collection 2a, 3 from collection 2b, and 3 from collection 4b) were colonized with two genetically distinct strains, as determined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

†Invasive isolates originated from the blood or cerebrospinal fluid of newborns <7 days of age, the urine of adults at ≥100,000 cfu/ml, pregnant women presenting for prenatal care associated with GBS isolation from the urine, and the placenta following delivery. Colonizing GBS were from the anal orifice, lower vagina, cervix or urine of healthy individuals, and sexually active college women with a urinary tract infection not caused by GBS.

Number of group B streptococcal isolates (n = 529) screened via dot blot hybridization and characteristics of each collection*. * Seventeen individuals (7 from collection 1a, 4 from collection 2a, 3 from collection 2b, and 3 from collection 4b) were colonized with two genetically distinct strains, as determined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. †Invasive isolates originated from the blood or cerebrospinal fluid of newborns <7 days of age, the urine of adults at ≥100,000 cfu/ml, pregnant women presenting for prenatal care associated with GBS isolation from the urine, and the placenta following delivery. Colonizing GBS were from the anal orifice, lower vagina, cervix or urine of healthy individuals, and sexually active college women with a urinary tract infection not caused by GBS. Serotyping using hyperimmune rabbit antisera to GBS polysaccharide types Ia, Ib, and II-VIII was performed as described previously [20,21]. We amplified DNA for genes encoding bca, bac and rib using PCR (Table 2). Control strain A909 was used to amplify bca and bac [25], while BM110 was used for rib [9]. PCR DNA was purified and fluorescein-labeled as described previously [26].
Table 2

PCR primers used to amplify DNA regions specific to the genes encoding the alpha (bca) and beta (bac) C proteins, and the protein Rib (rib).*

GeneForward primer Reverse primerReferenceSizeAnnealing temperatureExtension time
bca5'-TAACAGTTATGATACTTCACAGAC-3'[11]535 bp68°C33 sec
5-'ACGACTTTCTTCCGTCCACTTAGG-3'
bac5'-CTATTTTTGATATTGACAATGCAA-3'[12]592 bp60°C36 sec
5'-GTCGTTACTTCCTTGAGATGTAAC-3'
rib5'-CAGGAAGTGCTGTTACGTTAAAC-3'[9]369 bp58°C22 sec
5'-CGTCCCATTTAGGGTCTTCC-3'

* PCR conditions for each reaction included a five minute denaturation step at 95°C, and 30 cycles of the following: 35 second denaturation, 40 second annealing and varying extension times. The extension temperature was 73°C for all reactions.

PCR primers used to amplify DNA regions specific to the genes encoding the alpha (bca) and beta (bac) C proteins, and the protein Rib (rib).* * PCR conditions for each reaction included a five minute denaturation step at 95°C, and 30 cycles of the following: 35 second denaturation, 40 second annealing and varying extension times. The extension temperature was 73°C for all reactions. DNA was isolated using a modified E. coli protocol [27] in which cells were lysed overnight. Dot blot hybridization and subsequent analyses were performed as described previously [26,28] with two negative and positive controls per membrane. The signal intensity of each dot was reported as a percentage of the positive control present on each membrane in ImageQuant (Molecular Dynamics, CA). Percentages were corrected for the background signal of the negative controls and graphed. The x-axis represented values from one membrane and the y-axis consisted of values from the duplicate membrane. A cutoff was established based on each graph distribution [26]. Isolates within the intermediate range were repeated. Sixty-eight hybridizations yielded equivocal results despite repeated probing, and thus, were confirmed for the presence or absence of each gene by PCR and sequencing using the same primers described in Table 2. Eleven remained equivocal following PCR and were excluded from the analyses. Chi square tests were used to assess differences in gene frequencies by collection and serotype. SAS was used for all statistical analyses [29].

Results

Across GBS strain collections, the bca gene occurred most frequently, followed by rib and bac (Table 3). bca and bac occurred most frequently among colonizing isolates from college students (Collections 1, 2, and 4, Table 1), while the frequency of rib was similar across collections. Because gene frequency varies by capsular serotype, we described the frequency of each gene by serotype (Figure 1). When assessing the frequencies among invasive versus colonizing isolates, only isolates from newborns with GBS disease (n = 100) were considered invasive, while colonizing isolates consisted of those isolates known to not cause a UTI and those that were isolated during pregnancy as part of routine GBS screening (n = 360). In this analysis, rib occurred slightly more frequently among invasive versus colonizing isolates (p = .09) (Table 4), while both bac (p = .55) and bca (p = .002) occurred less frequently in the invasive strains.
Table 3

The frequency of genes encoding the alpha (bca) and beta (bac) C protein, and the protein Rib (rib) among various GBS populations.

alpha antigen (bca) ‡beta antigen (bac) ‡Rib protein (rib)
GBS CollectionNumber screenedn(%)Number screenedn(%)Number screenedn(%)
1. Sexually active college women with UTI and sex partner†14563(43)14726(18)14633(23)
2. Sexually active college women without UTI and their sex partner9358(62)9326(28)9317(18)
3. Infected newborns < 7 days of age10029(29)10020(20)10028(28)
4. Random sample of college students†5325(47)5318(34)5313(25)
5. Pregnant women13541(30)13118(14)13427(20)

Total526216(41)524108(21)526118(22)

Note: n (%) represents the number of participants with the respective gene in each population; the number screened varies slightly by gene and population because a result could not be obtained for 4 strains tested for rib and bca, and 6 strains tested for bac despite repeated testing.

†There was no difference in gene frequency by gender so the results were combined for presentation.

‡Using the Chi-square test, a significant difference at the p = .05 significance level was observed between bca frequencies in collection 2 versus 3 (p < .0001), 5 (p < .0001) and 1 (p = .004); and between bac frequencies in collection 2 versus 5 (p = .008).

Figure 1

The number of strains with genes encoding the alpha (bca) and beta (bac) C proteins and the protein Rib (rib) by serotypes Ia (n = 115), Ib (n = 60), II (n = 67), III (n = 84*), IV (n = 2), V (n = 105*), VI (n = 7*), VIII (n = 1), and nontypeable (NT) (n = 53). The sample represents the maximum number of isolates tested, which varied slightly by gene; serotyping data was not available for 35 strains.

Table 4

Frequency of genes encoding the alpha (bca) and beta (bac) C proteins, and the protein Rib (rib) among invasive versus colonizing group B streptococcal isolates by serotype.

Invasive n (%)Colonizing n (%)
bcabacribbcabacrib

Overall freq.29/100 (29)20/100 (20)28/100 (28)167/360 (46)*82/360 (23)72/360 (20)†
By Serotype
Ia0/33 (0)0/43 (0)0/33 (0)18/71 (25)*6/71 (8)†1/71 (1)
Ib12/12 (100)11/12 (92)0/12 (0)29/42 (69)*32/42 (76)3/42 (7)
II8/15 (53)2/15 (13)5/15 (33)25/45 (56)10/45 (22)15/45 (33)
III0/23 (0)6/23 (26)23/23 (100)5/44 (11)†4/44 (9)†39/44 (89)†
IV0/0 (0)0/0 (0)0/0 (0)1/2 (50)1/2 (50)0/2 (0)
V8/15 (53)1/15 (7)0/15 (0)51/76 (67)10/78 (13)6/78 (8)
VI0/0 (0)0/1 (0)0/0 (0)5/6 (83)0/6 (0)0/0 (0)
VIII0/0 (0)0/0 (0)0/0 (0)1/1 (100)1/1 (100)0/0 (0)
NT0/0 (0)0/10 (0)0/0 (0)23/41 (56)13/41 (32)5/41 (12)

Note: Serotype data are missing for 30 strains.

*The difference in the gene frequency between invasive and colonizing populations is statistically significant at p < .05 using the Chi square test.

†Marginally significant Chi square estimate (.06 < p < .10)

The frequency of genes encoding the alpha (bca) and beta (bac) C protein, and the protein Rib (rib) among various GBS populations. Note: n (%) represents the number of participants with the respective gene in each population; the number screened varies slightly by gene and population because a result could not be obtained for 4 strains tested for rib and bca, and 6 strains tested for bac despite repeated testing. †There was no difference in gene frequency by gender so the results were combined for presentation. ‡Using the Chi-square test, a significant difference at the p = .05 significance level was observed between bca frequencies in collection 2 versus 3 (p < .0001), 5 (p < .0001) and 1 (p = .004); and between bac frequencies in collection 2 versus 5 (p = .008). Frequency of genes encoding the alpha (bca) and beta (bac) C proteins, and the protein Rib (rib) among invasive versus colonizing group B streptococcal isolates by serotype. Note: Serotype data are missing for 30 strains. *The difference in the gene frequency between invasive and colonizing populations is statistically significant at p < .05 using the Chi square test. †Marginally significant Chi square estimate (.06 < p < .10) The number of strains with genes encoding the alpha (bca) and beta (bac) C proteins and the protein Rib (rib) by serotypes Ia (n = 115), Ib (n = 60), II (n = 67), III (n = 84*), IV (n = 2), V (n = 105*), VI (n = 7*), VIII (n = 1), and nontypeable (NT) (n = 53). The sample represents the maximum number of isolates tested, which varied slightly by gene; serotyping data was not available for 35 strains. After stratifying by serotype, invasive versus colonizing capsular serotype Ia strains were significantly less likely to have bca (p = .002), while Ib invasive strains were more likely to have bca (p = .03) (Table 4). Invasive versus colonizing capsular serotype III strains, however, were more likely to have both rib (p = .09) and bac (p = .06), and less likely to have bca (p = .09). Because a previous study also indicated that rib occurs more frequently in invasive isolates [7], we further examined its frequency by colonization site. Among invasive isolates from newborns, the odds of isolation from the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) compared to blood was 3.6 higher when rib [95% CI: (0.86, 15.44), p = .04], and 4.1 times higher when bac [95% CI: (0.92, 17.91), p = .03] were present. There was no association with bca. Because rib occurred in 92% of capsular serotype III isolates and was found infrequently in other serotypes, and type III occurred more frequently among infants with invasive disease, it is likely that the association with CSF is attributable to confounding. When we examined the colonization site by serotype among rib positive strains, 26% of serotype III and no serotype II strains (the only other serotype with rib) were isolated from the CSF. By contrast, among isolates without rib, 6%, 10% and 17% of serotype Ia, II and Ib strains, respectively, were isolated from the CSF. In a similar analysis of among bac positive strains, 50% of serotype III and 18% of serotype Ib, but no serotype II or V strains were isolated from the CSF. When the analysis was restricted to serotype III strains, rib was not associated with CSF isolation, but bac was (OR: 4.7, 95% CI: 0.43, 60.74), although the sample size was too small to achieve statistical significance (p = .12). The bca and bac genes frequently occurred together; 74 strains contained both genes among 324 strains with at least one gene (p < .0001). rib was significantly less likely to occur with either bca (11/333, p < .0001) or bac (14/224, p = .01). These relationships were similar when stratified by isolate type with a few exceptions. Among the 14 strains with rib and bac, 8 (57%) were invasive (p = .002); 7 of these 8 were from newborns and 6 of the 7 newborn strains were serotype III. Strains with both bca and rib together were more frequent in colonizing versus invasive strains (p = .03) as were strains with both bca and bac (p = .10).

Discussion

Based on the suggestion that the alpha and beta C proteins and protein Rib protein serve as potential vaccine GBS candidates either in glycoconjugates or alone [6-8], it was estimated in 1988, before the emergence of serotype V GBS, that a vaccine containing the alpha C protein and a serotype III component would prevent at least 90% of GBS cases [30]. Although we did not find these three genes significantly more frequently in invasive versus colonizing GBS strains, bac was found more frequently among isolates from CSF than blood in invasive serotype III isolates from newborns, suggesting it may increase disease severity. Although we detected differences in the frequency of specific genes, it is possible that the encoded proteins are differentially expressed [31,32] and thus, differences in pathogenicity could be attributable to differences in gene expression. A prior study demonstrated that protein Rib [7] was present in more invasive versus colonizing serotype III strains. In this study, invasive strains were more likely to have rib (p = .09), but the association was only marginally significant. A similar observation was found for bac (p = .06), which is consistent with a prior report [18]. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that the differences in collection date and geographic location are responsible for this result. Further, and possibly more important, the isolates assessed may contain other unknown virulence characteristics important to invasion, as the virulence of GBS is probably attributable to multiple genes. Our collections of invasive isolates were limited to those from newborns, pregnant women and healthy young women. It is possible that these virulence genes might have different impacts in other susceptible populations, such as the elderly or those with underlying chronic disease.

Conclusion

We observed only a marginally significant difference in bac, bca and rib frequency between invasive and colonizing serotype III strains, thereby raising the possibility that other genes explain the association of serotype III with invasive disease. It is noteworthy, however, that both rib and bac were found more frequently in the newborn serotype III isolates, while bca was found less frequently. Because various genotyping methods, such as multilocus sequence typing (MLST), have distinguished between colonizing and invasive strains, [33] this warrants further study. Using the framework provided by MLST, for example, may allow us to assess the distribution of these genes by sequence types found to be associated with invasiveness. In addition, it is clear that GBS disease pathogenesis is complex, thus novel virulence genes need to be identified and evaluated to understand their role in the pathogenic process, and provide additional vaccine targets. Recently published GBS DNA sequences [34-36] will facilitate the identification of these novel factors.

Competing interests

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

SDM conducted the data analysis and drafted the manuscript, MK performed the PCR on strains yielding an equivocal result; CFM and BF oversaw and participated in the study design, analysis and writing; KJK and SMB performed the dot blot assays; and CJB provided strains, performed serotyping and assisted with the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Pre-publication history

The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:
  35 in total

1.  Distribution and expression of bca, the gene encoding the c alpha protein, by Streptococcus agalactiae.

Authors:  J A Maeland; O G Brakstad; L Bevanger; S Krokstad
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.472

2.  Frequency of antibiotic resistance among group B Streptococcus isolated from healthy college students.

Authors:  S D Manning; M D Pearlman; P Tallman; C L Pierson; B Foxman
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2001-11-05       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Quantitative determination of immunoglobulin G specific for group B streptococcal beta C protein in human maternal serum.

Authors:  Catherine S Lachenauer; Carol J Baker; Miriam J Baron; Dennis L Kasper; Claudia Gravekamp; Lawrence C Madoff
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2002-01-17       Impact factor: 5.226

4.  Optimization of a fluorescent-based phosphor imaging dot blot DNA hybridization assay to assess E. coli virulence gene profiles.

Authors:  L Zhang; B W Gillespie; C F Marrs; B Foxman
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.363

5.  Group B Streptococcus colonization in male and nonpregnant female university students: a cross-sectional prevalence study.

Authors:  Sandra J Bliss; Shannon D Manning; Patricia Tallman; Carol J Baker; Mark D Pearlman; Carl F Marrs; Betsy Foxman
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2001-12-05       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Population-based active surveillance for neonatal group B streptococcal infections in Alberta, Canada: implications for vaccine formulation.

Authors:  H D Davies; S Raj; C Adair; J Robinson; A McGeer
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  Complete genome sequence and comparative genomic analysis of an emerging human pathogen, serotype V Streptococcus agalactiae.

Authors:  Herve Tettelin; Vega Masignani; Michael J Cieslewicz; Jonathan A Eisen; Scott Peterson; Michael R Wessels; Ian T Paulsen; Karen E Nelson; Immaculada Margarit; Timothy D Read; Lawrence C Madoff; Alex M Wolf; Maureen J Beanan; Lauren M Brinkac; Sean C Daugherty; Robert T DeBoy; A Scott Durkin; James F Kolonay; Ramana Madupu; Matthew R Lewis; Diana Radune; Nadezhda B Fedorova; David Scanlan; Hoda Khouri; Stephanie Mulligan; Heather A Carty; Robin T Cline; Susan E Van Aken; John Gill; Maria Scarselli; Marirosa Mora; Emilia T Iacobini; Cecilia Brettoni; Giuliano Galli; Massimo Mariani; Filippo Vegni; Domenico Maione; Daniela Rinaudo; Rino Rappuoli; John L Telford; Dennis L Kasper; Guido Grandi; Claire M Fraser
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-08-28       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  A population-based comparison of strategies to prevent early-onset group B streptococcal disease in neonates.

Authors:  Stephanie J Schrag; Elizabeth R Zell; Ruth Lynfield; Aaron Roome; Kathryn E Arnold; Allen S Craig; Lee H Harrison; Arthur Reingold; Karen Stefonek; Glenda Smith; Melanie Gamble; Anne Schuchat
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-07-25       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Genome sequence of Streptococcus agalactiae, a pathogen causing invasive neonatal disease.

Authors:  Philippe Glaser; Christophe Rusniok; Carmen Buchrieser; Fabien Chevalier; Lionel Frangeul; Tarek Msadek; Mohamed Zouine; Elisabeth Couvé; Lila Lalioui; Claire Poyart; Patrick Trieu-Cuot; Frank Kunst
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.501

10.  Determinants of co-colonization with group B streptococcus among heterosexual college couples.

Authors:  Shannon D Manning; Patricia Tallman; Carol J Baker; Brenda Gillespie; Carl F Marrs; Betsy Foxman
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.822

View more
  14 in total

1.  Group B streptococci causing neonatal infections in barcelona are a stable clonal population: 18-year surveillance.

Authors:  E R Martins; A Andreu; P Correia; T Juncosa; J Bosch; M Ramirez; J Melo-Cristino
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Alpha C protein-specific immunity in humans with group B streptococcal colonization and invasive disease.

Authors:  Pia S Pannaraj; Joanna K Kelly; Marcia A Rench; Lawrence C Madoff; Morven S Edwards; Carol J Baker
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  Group B streptococcus serotype prevalence in reproductive-age women at a tertiary care military medical center relative to global serotype distribution.

Authors:  Danielle L Ippolito; Wesley A James; Deborah Tinnemore; Raywin R Huang; Mary J Dehart; Julie Williams; Mark A Wingerd; Samandra T Demons
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 3.090

4.  Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of Streptococcus agalactiae in pregnant women. First study in a province of Argentina.

Authors:  P Oviedo; E Pegels; M Laczeski; M Quiroga; M Vergara
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 2.476

5.  Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles, serotype distribution and virulence determinants among invasive, non-invasive and colonizing Streptococcus agalactiae (group B streptococcus) from Malaysian patients.

Authors:  N Eskandarian; Z Ismail; V Neela; A van Belkum; M N M Desa; S Amin Nordin
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Clonal Distribution of Clindamycin-Resistant Erythromycin-Susceptible (CRES) Streptococcus agalactiae in Korea Based on Whole Genome Sequences.

Authors:  Takashi Takahashi; Takahiro Maeda; Seungjun Lee; Dong-Hyun Lee; Sunjoo Kim
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 3.464

7.  Epidemiology of and prenatal molecular distinction between invasive and colonizing group B streptococci in The Netherlands and Taiwan.

Authors:  E van Elzakker; R Yahiaoui; C Visser; P Oostvogel; A Muller; Y-R Ho; J-J Wu; A van Belkum
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 3.267

8.  Virulence factors and antibiotic resistance properties of Streptococcus species isolated from hospital cockroaches.

Authors:  Mohammad Chehelgerdi; Reza Ranjbar
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 2.893

9.  Status of group B streptococcal vaccine development.

Authors:  Shun Mei Lin; Yong Zhi; Ki Bum Ahn; Sangyong Lim; Ho Seong Seo
Journal:  Clin Exp Vaccine Res       Date:  2018-01-29

10.  Genotypes and virulence genes in group B streptococcus isolated in the maternity hospital, Kuwait.

Authors:  Edet E Udo; Samar S Boswihi; Noura Al-Sweih
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 1.927

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.