Literature DB >> 12737721

Conversion rate in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: evolution from 1993 and current state.

Francesco Domenico Capizzi1, Luciano Fogli, Mauro Brulatti, Sergio Boschi, Marco Di Domenico, Vito Papa, Patrizio Patrizi.   

Abstract

The definition of difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is inconsistent. The aim of this study was to analyze the factors that make LC difficult to perform and determine ways to avoid conversion, based on our series. All patients who underwent LC or open cholecystectomy (OC) between January 1993 and December 2001 in our division of general surgery were the subject matter of this study. Preliminary decisions regarding LC or OC were avoided. Our experience (1993-2001) was based on 1360 consecutive elective LC procedures in 381 male and 979 female patients. The mean age of the patients at operation was 53 years (range, 17-84). The median operating time was 55 minutes (range, 35-180). The overall conversion rate was 1.8%. Indications for conversion included surgical difficulty during the laparoscopic procedure and anesthesia issues. The conversion rate has decreased to less than 1% in recent years. There were no mortalities, and the postoperative complication rates were low. The mean hospital stay of the patients was 2.6 days. In conclusion, based on our experience, we suggest limiting OC to patients with proven contraindications to LC (i.e., Mirizzi syndrome or systemic illness incompatible with pneumoperitoneum), attempting LC in all other cases, and considering cholecystostomy and delayed LC as an alternative to conversion during difficult LC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12737721     DOI: 10.1089/109264203764654704

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  5 in total

Review 1.  Conversions during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: risk factors and effects on patient outcome.

Authors:  Benjie Tang; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  A randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension.

Authors:  Wu Ji; Ling-Tang Li; Zhi-Ming Wang; Zhu-Fu Quan; Xun-Ru Chen; Jie-Shou Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Patient outcomes after treatment with percutaneous cholecystostomy for biliary sepsis.

Authors:  S M Flexer; M B Peter; A C Durham-Hall; J R Ausobsky
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  [Twelve years of laparoscopic cholecystectomy].

Authors:  B K Wölnerhanssen; C Ackermann; M O Guenin; B Kern; P Tondelli; M von Flüe; R Peterli
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Conversion in laparoscopic cholecystectomy after gastric resection: a 15-year review.

Authors:  Shannon A Fraser; Harvey Sigman
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.089

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.