Literature DB >> 25759236

Do height and weight affect the feasibility of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy?

Hélène Meillat1, David Jérémie Birnbaum2, Régis Fara3, Julien Mancini4,5, Stéphane Berdah2, Thierry Bège6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard for gallbladder removal and the most common laparoscopic procedure worldwide. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery has recently emerged as a less invasive potential alternative to conventional three- or four-port laparoscopy. However, the feasibility of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) remains unclear, and there are no rigorous criteria in the literature. Identifying patients at risk of failure of this new technique is essential. The aim of our study was to determine risk factors that may predict failure of the procedure.
METHODS: From May 2010 to March 2012, 110 consecutive patients underwent SILC and were reviewed retrospectively. The main feasibility criterion was the procedure failure rate, defined as addition of supplementary port(s) and prolonged (>60 min) operative time. The factors evaluated were age, gender, height, weight, body mass index, previous abdominal surgery, indication for surgery and gallbladder suspension.
RESULTS: There was conversion in 16 patients (14.5%), and the operative time exceeded 60 min for 20 patients (30.9%). Univariate analysis showed a significant independent association between additional port requirement and each of weight as a continuous value, weight ≥80 kg, BMI >26.5 kg/m(2) and height >172 cm. Univariate analysis also showed a significant independent association between prolonged operative duration (>60 min) and each of height and weight as continuous values, height >172 cm and previous abdominal surgery. In the multivariate analysis, only weight remained independently associated with additional port requirement, and height remained independently associated with prolonged operative duration.
CONCLUSION: Preoperative identification of the factors increasing the risk of conversion may assist surgeons in making decisions concerning the management of patients, including appropriate use of SILC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cholecystectomy; Laparoscopy; Morbidity; Single incision

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25759236     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4115-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  39 in total

1.  Prospective randomized comparative study of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Eric C H Lai; George P C Yang; Chung Ngai Tang; Patricia C L Yih; Oliver C Y Chan; Michael K W Li
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Consensus statement of the consortium for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery.

Authors:  Inderbir S Gill; Arnold P Advincula; Monish Aron; Jeffrey Caddedu; David Canes; Paul G Curcillo; Mihir M Desai; John C Evanko; Tomasso Falcone; Victor Fazio; Matthew Gettman; Andrew A Gumbs; Georges-Pascal Haber; Jihad H Kaouk; Fernando Kim; Stephanie A King; Jeffrey Ponsky; Feza Remzi; Homero Rivas; Alexander Rosemurgy; Sharona Ross; Philip Schauer; Rene Sotelo; Jose Speranza; John Sweeney; Julio Teixeira
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  S Trastulli; R Cirocchi; J Desiderio; S Guarino; A Santoro; A Parisi; G Noya; C Boselli
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 4.  Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Thomas C Hall; Ashley R Dennison; Dilraj K Bilku; Matthew S Metcalfe; Giuseppe Garcea
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2012-07

5.  Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the first 100 outpatients.

Authors:  Jose Erbella; Gary M Bunch
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Early surgeon impressions and technical difficulty associated with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: a Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons Learning Center study.

Authors:  Arsalla Islam; Antonio O Castellvi; Seifu T Tesfay; Alejandro D Castellvi; Andrew S Wright; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stavros A Antoniou; Rudolph Pointner; Frank A Granderath
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  The feasibility of single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a pilot study of 20 cases.

Authors:  Prashanth P Rao; Sonali M Bhagwat; Abhay Rane; Pradeep P Rao
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.647

9.  Randomized clinical trial of single- versus multi-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  L N Jørgensen; J Rosenberg; H Al-Tayar; S Assaadzadeh; F Helgstrand; T Bisgaard
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Single incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy outcomes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Liangyuan Geng; Changhua Sun; Jianfeng Bai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Phase II clinical experience and long-term follow-up using the next-generation single-incision platform FMX314.

Authors:  Martin Berducci; Hans F Fuchs; Pablo Omelanczuk; Ryan C Broderick; Cristina R Harnsberger; Joshua Langert; Jorge Nefa; Pablo Jaureguiberry; Pablo Gomez; Laura Miranda; Garth R Jacobsen; Bryan J Sandler; Santiago Horgan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  True single-port cholecystectomy with ICG cholangiography through a single 15-mm trocar using the new surgical platform "symphonX": first human case study with a commercially available device.

Authors:  Rabi R Datta; Georg Dieplinger; Roger Wahba; Robert Kleinert; Michael Thomas; Florian Gebauer; Lars Schiffmann; Dirk L Stippel; Christiane J Bruns; Hans F Fuchs
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic surgery and robotic surgery for single-incision cholecystectomy: an updated systematic review.

Authors:  Weier Wang; Xiaodong Sun; Fangqiang Wei
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-04-22

4.  One-year experience with single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a single center: without the use of inverse triangulation.

Authors:  Yun Beom Ryu; Jung Woo Lee; Yo Han Park; Man Sup Lim; Ji Woong Cho; Jang Yong Jeon
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 1.859

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.