Literature DB >> 16842375

Drug development in oncology: classical cytotoxics and molecularly targeted agents.

Shivaani Kummar1, Martin Gutierrez, James H Doroshow, Anthony J Murgo.   

Abstract

There is an apparent need to improve the speed and efficiency of oncological drug development. Furthermore, strategies traditionally applied to the development of standard cytotoxic chemotherapy may not be appropriate for molecularly targeted agents. This is particularly the case for exploratory Phase 1 and 2 trials. Conventional approaches to determine dose based on maximum tolerability and efficacy based on objective tumour response may not be suitable for targeted agents, since many of them have a wide therapeutic index and inhibit tumour growth without demonstrable cytotoxicity. Instead, exploratory trials of targeted agents may have to focus on other end-points such as pharmacological effects and disease stabilization. Thus, there is an increasing interest in making the best possible use of biomarkers and pharmacogenomics in early phases of drug development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16842375      PMCID: PMC1885070          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2006.02713.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  59 in total

1.  Phase II study of imatinib mesylate plus hydroxyurea in adults with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  David A Reardon; Merrill J Egorin; Jennifer A Quinn; Jeremy N Rich; Jeremy N Rich; Sridharan Gururangan; Idharan Gururangan; James J Vredenburgh; Annick Desjardins; Sith Sathornsumetee; James M Provenzale; James E Herndon; Jeannette M Dowell; Michael A Badruddoja; Roger E McLendon; Theodore F Lagattuta; Kimberly P Kicielinski; Gregor Dresemann; John H Sampson; Allan H Friedman; August J Salvado; Henry S Friedman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Improved designs for dose escalation studies using pharmacokinetic measurements.

Authors:  S Piantadosi; G Liu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-08-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Pharmacologically guided phase I clinical trials based upon preclinical drug development.

Authors:  J M Collins; C K Grieshaber; B A Chabner
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1990-08-15       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 4.  Regulatory considerations for preclinical development of anticancer drugs.

Authors:  J J DeGeorge; C H Ahn; P A Andrews; M E Brower; D W Giorgio; M A Goheer; D Y Lee-Ham; W D McGuinn; W Schmidt; C J Sun; S C Tripathi
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.333

5.  There are no bad anticancer agents, only bad clinical trial designs--twenty-first Richard and Hinda Rosenthal Foundation Award Lecture.

Authors:  D D Von Hoff
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 6.  Designs for efficient clinical trials.

Authors:  R Simon
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 2.990

7.  Design and analysis of phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  B E Storer
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  O6-benzylguanine: a clinical trial establishing the biochemical modulatory dose in tumor tissue for alkyltransferase-directed DNA repair.

Authors:  T P Spiro; S L Gerson; L Liu; S Majka; J Haaga; C L Hoppel; S T Ingalls; J M Pluda; J K Willson
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1999-05-15       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Accelerated titration designs for phase I clinical trials in oncology.

Authors:  R Simon; B Freidlin; L Rubinstein; S G Arbuck; J Collins; M C Christian
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1997-08-06       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Differences in N-acetylation of the experimental antitumor agent batracylin in the mouse and the rat.

Authors:  M M Ames; D A Mathiesen; J M Reid
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.850

View more
  44 in total

Review 1.  Envisioning the future of early anticancer drug development.

Authors:  Timothy A Yap; Shahneen K Sandhu; Paul Workman; Johann S de Bono
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  Cancer pharmacotherapy: 21st century 'magic bullets' and changing paradigms.

Authors:  L D Lewis
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Biomarker method validation in anticancer drug development.

Authors:  J Cummings; T H Ward; A Greystoke; M Ranson; C Dive
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 8.739

4.  Molecular biology and therapeutics in musculoskeletal oncology.

Authors:  Theresa A Guise; Regis O'Keefe; R Lor Randall; Richard M Terek
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 5.  Maximum tolerated dose: clinical endpoint for a bygone era?

Authors:  Chris H Takimoto
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2009-04-18       Impact factor: 4.493

6.  A Bayesian dose-finding design incorporating toxicity data from multiple treatment cycles.

Authors:  Jun Yin; Rui Qin; Monia Ezzalfani; Daniel J Sargent; Sumithra J Mandrekar
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 7.  The changing therapeutic landscape of castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Timothy A Yap; Andrea Zivi; Aurelius Omlin; Johann S de Bono
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 66.675

8.  CXCR-4 Targeted, Short Wave Infrared (SWIR) Emitting Nanoprobes for Enhanced Deep Tissue Imaging and Micrometastatic Cancer Lesion Detection.

Authors:  Margot Zevon; Vidya Ganapathy; Harini Kantamneni; Marco Mingozzi; Paul Kim; Derek Adler; Yang Sheng; Mei Chee Tan; Mark Pierce; Richard E Riman; Charles M Roth; Prabhas V Moghe
Journal:  Small       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 13.281

9.  Trends in endpoint selection in clinical trials of advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Seung Yeon Song; Heenam Seo; Gyungjin Kim; Ah Rong Kim; Eun Young Kim
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 4.553

10.  Clinical evaluation of M30 and M65 ELISA cell death assays as circulating biomarkers in a drug-sensitive tumor, testicular cancer.

Authors:  Esther C de Haas; Alessandra di Pietro; Kathryn L Simpson; Coby Meijer; Albert J H Suurmeijer; Lee J Lancashire; J Cummings; Steven de Jong; Elisabeth G E de Vries; Caroline Dive; Jourik A Gietema
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.715

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.