Literature DB >> 19377851

Maximum tolerated dose: clinical endpoint for a bygone era?

Chris H Takimoto1.   

Abstract

The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) has been the classically recommended phase II dose for cytotoxic chemotherapy anticancer agents. However, the development of molecular targeted therapies with highly specific mechanisms of action has raised questions about the paradigm of dosing at the MTD. Inhibition of the molecular target may occur at dose levels substantially below those producing dose limiting toxicities. The impact of targeted therapies on our dose selection strategies has been immense; however, defining the MTD in phase I oncology trials still provides valuable information for future drug development. But, the MTD should not be selected blindly as the recommended phase II dose for efficacy testing. Optimal dose selection for targeted cancer agents needs to be evaluated using all available information collected during the early stages of drug development. Definition of the optimal dose may need to be deferred until randomized phase II trials can be conducted. Future clinical trail designs in oncology drug development need to reflect this paradigm shift.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19377851     DOI: 10.1007/s11523-009-0108-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Target Oncol        ISSN: 1776-2596            Impact factor:   4.493


  23 in total

Review 1.  Auditing the pharmacological accounts for Hsp90 molecular chaperone inhibitors: unfolding the relationship between pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

Authors:  Paul Workman
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 6.261

Review 2.  Dose selection in phase I studies: why we should always go for the top.

Authors:  Stefan Sleijfer; Erik Wiemer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Trends in the use and role of biomarkers in phase I oncology trials.

Authors:  Bernardo H L Goulart; Jeffrey W Clark; Homer H Pien; Thomas G Roberts; Stan N Finkelstein; Bruce A Chabner
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Optimising the design of phase II oncology trials: the importance of randomisation.

Authors:  Mark J Ratain; Daniel J Sargent
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 9.162

5.  Dose selection in phase I studies: why we should always go for the most effective.

Authors:  Ian E Haines
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-07-20       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Novel Phase I dose de-escalation design trial to determine the biological modulatory dose of the antiangiogenic agent SU5416.

Authors:  Afshin Dowlati; Kelly Robertson; Tomas Radivoyevitch; John Waas; Nicholas P Ziats; Paul Hartman; Fadi W Abdul-Karim; Jay K Wasman; Jack Jesberger; Jonathan Lewin; Keith McCrae; Percy Ivy; Scot C Remick
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2005-11-01       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of biomarker response and tumor growth inhibition to an orally available cMet kinase inhibitor in human tumor xenograft mouse models.

Authors:  Shinji Yamazaki; Judith Skaptason; David Romero; Joseph H Lee; Helen Y Zou; James G Christensen; Jeffrey R Koup; Bill J Smith; Tatiana Koudriakova
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 3.922

8.  Multi-institutional randomized phase II trial of gefitinib for previously treated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (The IDEAL 1 Trial) [corrected].

Authors:  Masahiro Fukuoka; Seiji Yano; Giuseppe Giaccone; Tomohide Tamura; Kazuhiko Nakagawa; Jean-Yves Douillard; Yutaka Nishiwaki; Johan Vansteenkiste; Shinzoh Kudoh; Danny Rischin; Richard Eek; Takeshi Horai; Kazumasa Noda; Ichiro Takata; Egbert Smit; Steven Averbuch; Angela Macleod; Andrea Feyereislova; Rui-Ping Dong; José Baselga
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-05-14       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  Phase 0 clinical trials in oncology: a paradigm shift for early drug development?

Authors:  Chris H Takimoto
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 3.333

10.  A history of cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  Vincent T DeVita; Edward Chu
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Envisioning the future of early anticancer drug development.

Authors:  Timothy A Yap; Shahneen K Sandhu; Paul Workman; Johann S de Bono
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  Precision tyrosine kinase inhibitor dosing in chronic myeloid leukemia?

Authors:  Giuseppe Saglio; Carmen Fava; Robert Peter Gale
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 9.941

3.  Efficacy of first-line erlotinib in non-small cell lung cancer patients undergoing dose reduction and those with a low body surface area: A population-based observational study by the Ibaraki Thoracic Integrative (POSITIVE) Research Group.

Authors:  Masaharu Inagaki; Yoko Shinohara; Takayuki Kaburagi; Shinsuke Homma; Nobuyuki Hizawa; Hiroyuki Nakamura; Kenji Hayashihara; Takefumi Saito; Hiroichi Ishikawa; Hideo Ichimura; Takeshi Nawa; Norihiro Kikuchi; Kunihiko Miyazaki; Takahide Kodama; Koichi Kamiyama; Hiroaki Satoh; Kinya Furukawa
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-21

Review 4.  Tumor control versus adverse events with targeted anticancer therapies.

Authors:  Dorothy M K Keefe; Emma H Bateman
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  Precision Dosing of Targeted Therapies Is Ready for Prime Time.

Authors:  Neeltje Steeghs; Alwin D R Huitema; Stefanie L Groenland; Remy B Verheijen; Markus Joerger; Ron H J Mathijssen; Alex Sparreboom; Jos H Beijnen; Jan H Beumer
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non-small-cell lung cancer patients undergoing dose reduction and those with a low body surface area.

Authors:  Shinya Sato; Koichi Kurishima; Kunihiko Miyazaki; Takahide Kodama; Hiroichi Ishikawa; Katsunori Kagohashi; Tomohiro Tamura; Shinsuke Homma; Hiroaki Satoh; Nobuyuki Hizawa
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-04-16

7.  Anti-EGFL7 antibodies enhance stress-induced endothelial cell death and anti-VEGF efficacy.

Authors:  Leisa Johnson; Mahrukh Huseni; Tanya Smyczek; Anthony Lima; Stacey Yeung; Jason H Cheng; Rafael Molina; David Kan; Ann De Mazière; Judith Klumperman; Ian Kasman; Yin Zhang; Mark S Dennis; Jeffrey Eastham-Anderson; Adrian M Jubb; Olivia Hwang; Rupal Desai; Maike Schmidt; Michelle A Nannini; Kai H Barck; Richard A D Carano; William F Forrest; Qinghua Song; Daniel S Chen; Louie Naumovski; Mallika Singh; Weilan Ye; Priti S Hegde
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  Metronomic capecitabine versus best supportive care as second-line treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Andrea Casadei Gardini; Flavia Foca; Mario Scartozzi; Nicola Silvestris; Emiliano Tamburini; Luca Faloppi; Oronzo Brunetti; Britt Rudnas; Salvatore Pisconti; Martina Valgiusti; Giorgia Marisi; Francesco Giuseppe Foschi; Giorgio Ercolani; Davide Tassinari; Stefano Cascinu; Giovanni Luca Frassineti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Can we cure stage IV triple-negative breast carcinoma?: Another case report of long-term survival (7 years).

Authors:  Ben Man-Fai Chue; Bryce Douglas La Course
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  Evaluation of solid tumor response to sequential treatment cycles via a new computational hybrid approach.

Authors:  Farshad Moradi Kashkooli; M Soltani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.