Literature DB >> 8858785

Improved designs for dose escalation studies using pharmacokinetic measurements.

S Piantadosi1, G Liu.   

Abstract

We describe a method for incorporating pharmacokinetic (PK) data into dose escalation clinical trial designs. Doing so can improve the efficiency and accuracy of these studies. The method proposed uses a parametric dose response function that models the probability of response in each person with two effects: the dose of drug administered and an ancillary pharmacokinetic measurements. After treatment and observation of each subject (or group of subjects) for response, one calculates the dose to be administered to the next individual (or group) to yield the target probability of response from the current best estimate of the dose-response curve. This procedure is a variant of the continual reassessment method (CRM). Statistical simulations employing a logistic dose-response model (that is, we model the logit of the response probability as a linear combination of predictors), dose of drug, and the area under the time-concentration curve (AUC) demonstrate that the addition of pharmacokinetic information to the CRM is a practical and useful way to improve both dose-response modelling and the design of dose escalation studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8858785     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960815)15:15<1605::AID-SIM325>3.0.CO;2-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  17 in total

Review 1.  Ethical issues in the development of new agents.

Authors:  C K Daugherty
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 2.  Modelling and simulation in the development and use of anti-cancer agents: an underused tool?

Authors:  Ferdinand Rombout; Leon Aarons; Mats Karlsson; Anthony Man; France Mentré; Peter Nygren; Amy Racine; Hans Schaefer; Jean-Louis Steimer; Iñaki Troconiz; Achiel van Peer
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.745

3.  Continual Reassessment and Related Dose-Finding Designs.

Authors:  John O'Quigley; Mark Conaway
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.901

4.  Continual reassessment and related designs in dose-finding studies.

Authors:  Alexia Iasonos; John O'Quigley
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Sequential designs for individualized dosing in phase I cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Xuezhou Mao; Ying Kuen Cheung
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 6.  Drug development in oncology: classical cytotoxics and molecularly targeted agents.

Authors:  Shivaani Kummar; Martin Gutierrez; James H Doroshow; Anthony J Murgo
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Continual reassessment method vs. traditional empirically based design: modifications motivated by Phase I trials in pediatric oncology by the Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium.

Authors:  Arzu Onar; Mehmet Kocak; James M Boyett
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.051

8.  TEAMS: Toxicity- and Efficacy-based Dose Insertion Design with Adaptive Model Selection for Phase I/II Dose-Escalation Trials in Oncology.

Authors:  Wentian Guo; Yang Ni; Yuan Ji
Journal:  Stat Biosci       Date:  2015-06-30

9.  Statistical Methods for Clinical Trial Designs in the New Era of Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Beibei Guo; Rui Zhang
Journal:  Biostat Biom Open Access J       Date:  2018-02-28

10.  Bridging Solutions in Dose Finding Problems.

Authors:  John O'Quigley; Alexia Iasonos
Journal:  Stat Biopharm Res       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 1.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.