BACKGROUND: Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) refer to a broader group of neurobiological conditions, pervasive developmental disorders. They are characterised by a symptomatic triad associated with qualitative changes in social interactions, defect in communication abilities, and repetitive and stereotyped interests and activities. ASD is prevalent in 1 to 3 per 1000 people. Despite several arguments for a strong genetic contribution, the molecular basis of a most cases remains unexplained. About 5% of patients with autism have a chromosome abnormality visible with cytogenetic methods. The most frequent are 15q11-q13 duplication, 2q37 and 22q13.3 deletions. Many other chromosomal imbalances have been described. However, most of them remain undetectable using routine karyotype analysis, thus impeding diagnosis and genetic counselling. METHODS AND RESULTS: 29 patients presenting with syndromic ASD were investigated using a DNA microarray constructed from large insert clones spaced at approximately 1 Mb intervals across the genome. Eight clinically relevant rearrangements were identified in 8 (27.5%) patients: six deletions and two duplications. Altered segments ranged in size from 1.4 to 16 Mb (2-19 clones). No recurrent abnormality was identified. CONCLUSION: These results clearly show that array comparative genomic hybridisation should be considered to be an essential aspect of the genetic analysis of patients with syndromic ASD. Moreover, besides their importance for diagnosis and genetic counselling, they may allow the delineation of new contiguous gene syndromes associated with ASD. Finally, the detailed molecular analysis of the rearranged regions may pave the way for the identification of new ASD genes.
BACKGROUND:Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) refer to a broader group of neurobiological conditions, pervasive developmental disorders. They are characterised by a symptomatic triad associated with qualitative changes in social interactions, defect in communication abilities, and repetitive and stereotyped interests and activities. ASD is prevalent in 1 to 3 per 1000 people. Despite several arguments for a strong genetic contribution, the molecular basis of a most cases remains unexplained. About 5% of patients with autism have a chromosome abnormality visible with cytogenetic methods. The most frequent are 15q11-q13 duplication, 2q37 and 22q13.3 deletions. Many other chromosomal imbalances have been described. However, most of them remain undetectable using routine karyotype analysis, thus impeding diagnosis and genetic counselling. METHODS AND RESULTS: 29 patients presenting with syndromic ASD were investigated using a DNA microarray constructed from large insert clones spaced at approximately 1 Mb intervals across the genome. Eight clinically relevant rearrangements were identified in 8 (27.5%) patients: six deletions and two duplications. Altered segments ranged in size from 1.4 to 16 Mb (2-19 clones). No recurrent abnormality was identified. CONCLUSION: These results clearly show that array comparative genomic hybridisation should be considered to be an essential aspect of the genetic analysis of patients with syndromic ASD. Moreover, besides their importance for diagnosis and genetic counselling, they may allow the delineation of new contiguous gene syndromes associated with ASD. Finally, the detailed molecular analysis of the rearranged regions may pave the way for the identification of new ASD genes.
Authors: S Solinas-Toldo; S Lampel; S Stilgenbauer; J Nickolenko; A Benner; H Döhner; T Cremer; P Lichter Journal: Genes Chromosomes Cancer Date: 1997-12 Impact factor: 5.006
Authors: Joris A Veltman; Eric F P M Schoenmakers; Bert H Eussen; Irene Janssen; Gerard Merkx; Brigitte van Cleef; Conny M van Ravenswaaij; Han G Brunner; Dominique Smeets; Ad Geurts van Kessel Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2002-04-09 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: D Pinkel; R Segraves; D Sudar; S Clark; I Poole; D Kowbel; C Collins; W L Kuo; C Chen; Y Zhai; S H Dairkee; B M Ljung; J W Gray; D G Albertson Journal: Nat Genet Date: 1998-10 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Lisenka E L M Vissers; Bert B A de Vries; Kazutoyo Osoegawa; Irene M Janssen; Ton Feuth; Chik On Choy; Huub Straatman; Walter van der Vliet; Erik H L P G Huys; Anke van Rijk; Dominique Smeets; Conny M A van Ravenswaaij-Arts; Nine V Knoers; Ineke van der Burgt; Pieter J de Jong; Han G Brunner; Ad Geurts van Kessel; Eric F P M Schoenmakers; Joris A Veltman Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2003-11-18 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Lynn Dukes-Rimsky; Gregory F Guzauskas; Kenton R Holden; Rachel Griggs; Sydney Ladd; Maria del Carmen Montoya; Barbara R DuPont; Anand K Srivastava Journal: Am J Med Genet A Date: 2011-08-10 Impact factor: 2.802
Authors: Thomas P Cast; Daniel J Boesch; Kim Smyth; Alisa E Shaw; Michael Ghebrial; Soham Chanda Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2020-12-02 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Xudong Liu; Patrick Malenfant; Chelsea Reesor; Alana Lee; Melissa L Hudson; Chansonette Harvard; Ying Qiao; Antonio M Persico; Ira L Cohen; Albert E Chudley; Cynthia Forster-Gibson; Evica Rajcan-Separovic; M E Suzanne Lewis; Jeanette J A Holden Journal: Eur J Hum Genet Date: 2011-07-13 Impact factor: 4.246
Authors: Rainald Moessner; Christian R Marshall; James S Sutcliffe; Jennifer Skaug; Dalila Pinto; John Vincent; Lonnie Zwaigenbaum; Bridget Fernandez; Wendy Roberts; Peter Szatmari; Stephen W Scherer Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2007-10-16 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Barbara Wiśniowiecka-Kowalnik; Monika Kastory-Bronowska; Magdalena Bartnik; Katarzyna Derwińska; Wanda Dymczak-Domini; Dorota Szumbarska; Ewa Ziemka; Krzysztof Szczałuba; Maciej Sykulski; Tomasz Gambin; Anna Gambin; Chad A Shaw; Tadeusz Mazurczak; Ewa Obersztyn; Ewa Bocian; Paweł Stankiewicz Journal: Eur J Hum Genet Date: 2012-10-03 Impact factor: 4.246