Literature DB >> 9408757

Matrix-based comparative genomic hybridization: biochips to screen for genomic imbalances.

S Solinas-Toldo1, S Lampel, S Stilgenbauer, J Nickolenko, A Benner, H Döhner, T Cremer, P Lichter.   

Abstract

Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) to metaphase chromosomes has been widely used for the genome-wide screening of genomic imbalances in tumor cells. Substitution of the chromosome targets by a matrix consisting of an ordered set of defined nucleic acid target sequences would greatly enhance the resolution and simplify the analysis procedure, both of which are prerequisites for a broad application of CGH as a diagnostic tool. However, hybridization of whole genomic human DNA to immobilized single-copy DNA fragments with complexities below the megabase pair level has been hampered by the low probability of specific binding because of the high probe complexity. We developed a protocol that allows CGH to chips consisting of glass slides with immobilized target DNAs arrayed in small spots. High-copy-number amplifications contained in tumor cells were rapidly scored by use of target DNAs as small as a cosmid. Low-copy-number gains and losses were identified reliably by their ratios by use of chromosome-specific DNA libraries or genomic fragments as small as 75 kb cloned in PI or PAC vectors as targets, thus greatly improving the resolution achievable by chromosomal CGH. The ratios obtained for the same chromosomal imbalance by matrix CGH and by chromosomal CGH corresponded very well. The new matrix CGH protocol provides a basis for the development of automated diagnostic procedures with biochips designed to meet clinical needs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9408757

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer        ISSN: 1045-2257            Impact factor:   5.006


  218 in total

1.  Quantifying single gene copy number by measuring fluorescent probe lengths on combed genomic DNA.

Authors:  J Herrick; X Michalet; C Conti; C Schurra; A Bensimon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-01-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  New tools in molecular pathology.

Authors:  P Lichter
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.568

3.  Genomic imbalances in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma identified by molecular cytogenetic techniques.

Authors:  Marilanda Ferreira Bellini; Ana Elizabete Silva; Marileila Varella-Garcia
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 1.771

4.  Digital karyotyping.

Authors:  Tian-Li Wang; Christine Maierhofer; Michael R Speicher; Christoph Lengauer; Bert Vogelstein; Kenneth W Kinzler; Victor E Velculescu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-12-02       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Automated array-based genomic profiling in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: development of a clinical tool and discovery of recurrent genomic alterations.

Authors:  Carsten Schwaenen; Michelle Nessling; Swen Wessendorf; Tatjana Salvi; Gunnar Wrobel; Bernhard Radlwimmer; Hans A Kestler; Christian Haslinger; Stephan Stilgenbauer; Hartmut Döhner; Martin Bentz; Peter Lichter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-01-16       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  A whole-genome mouse BAC microarray with 1-Mb resolution for analysis of DNA copy number changes by array comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Yeun-Jun Chung; Jos Jonkers; Hannah Kitson; Heike Fiegler; Sean Humphray; Carol Scott; Sarah Hunt; Yuejin Yu; Ichiko Nishijima; Arno Velds; Henne Holstege; Nigel Carter; Allan Bradley
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Array painting: a method for the rapid analysis of aberrant chromosomes using DNA microarrays.

Authors:  H Fiegler; S M Gribble; D C Burford; P Carr; E Prigmore; K M Porter; S Clegg; J A Crolla; N R Dennis; P Jacobs; N P Carter
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 8.  [Necessity and usefulness of bioinformatic methods for microarray data analysis].

Authors:  H A Kestler; R Küfer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  A set of BAC clones spanning the human genome.

Authors:  Martin Krzywinski; Ian Bosdet; Duane Smailus; Readman Chiu; Carrie Mathewson; Natasja Wye; Sarah Barber; Mabel Brown-John; Susanna Chan; Steve Chand; Alison Cloutier; Noreen Girn; Darlene Lee; Amara Masson; Michael Mayo; Teika Olson; Pawan Pandoh; Anna-Liisa Prabhu; Eric Schoenmakers; Miranda Tsai; Donna Albertson; Wan Lam; Chik-On Choy; Kazutoyo Osoegawa; Shaying Zhao; Pieter J de Jong; Jacqueline Schein; Steven Jones; Marco A Marra
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-07-09       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Detecting single DNA copy number variations in complex genomes using one nanogram of starting DNA and BAC-array CGH.

Authors:  Marine Guillaud-Bataille; Alexander Valent; Pascal Soularue; Christine Perot; Maria Mar Inda; Aline Receveur; Sadek Smaïli; Hugues Roest Crollius; Jean Bénard; Alain Bernheim; Xavier Gidrol; Gisèle Danglot
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.