Literature DB >> 16838536

Monaural and binaural loudness of 5- and 200-ms tones in normal and impaired hearing.

Shani Whilby1, Mary Florentine, Eva Wagner, Jeremy Marozeau.   

Abstract

The difference in level required to match monaural and binaural loudness of 5- and 200-ms tones was measured for listeners with normal and impaired hearing. Stimuli were 1-kHz tones presented at levels ranging from 10 to 90 dB sensation level. Sixteen listeners (eight normal and eight with losses of primarily cochlear origin) made loudness matches between equal-duration monaural and binaural tones using an adaptive 2AFC procedure. The present results corroborate existing data for 200-ms tones in normal listeners and provide new data for 5-ms tones. On average, the binaural level difference required for equal loudness of monaural and binaural tones is about the same for 5- and 200-ms tones of equal level and changes as a function of level. The group data for normal and impaired listeners are in reasonable agreement with data in the literature. However, the data from some of the impaired listeners deviate markedly from the average, indicating that group data do not accurately represent the behavior of all impaired listeners. Derived loudness functions from the loudness-matching data are reasonably consistent with individual data in the literature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16838536     DOI: 10.1121/1.2193813

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  10 in total

1.  Towards a unifying basis of auditory thresholds: binaural summation.

Authors:  Peter Heil
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-03

2.  Testing the binaural equal-loudness-ratio hypothesis with hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Jeremy Marozeau; Mary Florentine
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Cortical activation patterns to spatially presented pure tone stimuli with different intensities measured by functional near-infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  Günther Bauernfeind; Selina C Wriessnegger; Sabine Haumann; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Binaural loudness summation for speech presented via earphones and loudspeaker with and without visual cues.

Authors:  Michael Epstein; Mary Florentine
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  NAL-NL2 empirical adjustments.

Authors:  Gitte Keidser; Harvey Dillon; Lyndal Carter; Anna O'Brien
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2012-11-30

6.  Monaural level discrimination under dichotic conditions.

Authors:  Daniel E Shub; Nathaniel I Durlach; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.482

Review 7.  Development and current status of the "Cambridge" loudness models.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  A Loudness Model for Time-Varying Sounds Incorporating Binaural Inhibition.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Brian R Glasberg; Ajanth Varathanathan; Josef Schlittenlacher
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Simple reaction time for broadband sounds compared to pure tones.

Authors:  Josef Schlittenlacher; Wolfgang Ellermeier; Gül Avci
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Potential Consequences of Spectral and Binaural Loudness Summation for Bilateral Hearing Aid Fitting.

Authors:  Maarten van Beurden; Monique Boymans; Mirjam van Geleuken; Dirk Oetting; Birger Kollmeier; Wouter A Dreschler
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.