Literature DB >> 24385083

Towards a unifying basis of auditory thresholds: binaural summation.

Peter Heil1.   

Abstract

Absolute auditory threshold decreases with increasing sound duration, a phenomenon explainable by the assumptions that the sound evokes neural events whose probabilities of occurrence are proportional to the sound's amplitude raised to an exponent of about 3 and that a constant number of events are required for threshold (Heil and Neubauer, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:6151-6156, 2003). Based on this probabilistic model and on the assumption of perfect binaural summation, an equation is derived here that provides an explicit expression of the binaural threshold as a function of the two monaural thresholds, irrespective of whether they are equal or unequal, and of the exponent in the model. For exponents >0, the predicted binaural advantage is largest when the two monaural thresholds are equal and decreases towards zero as the monaural threshold difference increases. This equation is tested and the exponent derived by comparing binaural thresholds with those predicted on the basis of the two monaural thresholds for different values of the exponent. The thresholds, measured in a large sample of human subjects with equal and unequal monaural thresholds and for stimuli with different temporal envelopes, are compatible only with an exponent close to 3. An exponent of 3 predicts a binaural advantage of 2 dB when the two ears are equally sensitive. Thus, listening with two (equally sensitive) ears rather than one has the same effect on absolute threshold as doubling duration. The data suggest that perfect binaural summation occurs at threshold and that peripheral neural signals are governed by an exponent close to 3. They might also shed new light on mechanisms underlying binaural summation of loudness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24385083      PMCID: PMC3946133          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-013-0432-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  35 in total

1.  Comparison of absolute thresholds derived from an adaptive forced-choice procedure and from reaction probabilities and reaction times in a simple reaction time paradigm.

Authors:  Peter Heil; Heinrich Neubauer; Andreas Tiefenau; Hellmut von Specht
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-07-06

2.  Monaural and binaural loudness of 5- and 200-ms tones in normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Shani Whilby; Mary Florentine; Eva Wagner; Jeremy Marozeau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  A physiological model for the stimulus dependence of first-spike latency of auditory-nerve fibers.

Authors:  Heinrich Neubauer; Peter Heil
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Towards a unifying basis of auditory thresholds: distributions of the first-spike latencies of auditory-nerve fibers.

Authors:  Peter Heil; Heinrich Neubauer; Mel Brown; Dexter R F Irvine
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Temporal integration of trains of tone pulses by normal and by cochlearly impaired listeners.

Authors:  R P Carlyon; S Buus; M Florentine
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Detection thresholds for brief sounds--are they a measure of auditory intensity integration?

Authors:  K Krumbholz; L Wiegrebe
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Detection threshold microstructure and its effect on temporal integration data.

Authors:  M F Cohen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Influence of rise-fall time upon short-tone threshold.

Authors:  P J Dallos; K R Johnson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1966-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Auditory temporal integration in the rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  K N O'Connor; P Barruel; R Hajalilou; M L Sutter
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Why longer song elements are easier to detect: threshold level-duration functions in the Great Tit and comparison with human data.

Authors:  Nina U Pohl; Hans Slabbekoorn; Heinrich Neubauer; Peter Heil; Georg M Klump; Ulrike Langemann
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 1.836

View more
  4 in total

1.  Changes in audiometric threshold and frequency selectivity correlate with cochlear histopathology in macaque monkeys with permanent noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  Jane A Burton; Chase A Mackey; Kaitlyn S MacDonald; Troy A Hackett; Ramnarayan Ramachandran
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Correlations between cochlear pathophysiology and behavioral measures of temporal and spatial processing in noise exposed macaques.

Authors:  Chase A Mackey; Jennifer McCrate; Kaitlyn S MacDonald; Jessica Feller; Leslie Liberman; M Charles Liberman; Troy A Hackett; Ramnarayan Ramachandran
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 3.  Modeling auditory coding: from sound to spikes.

Authors:  Marek Rudnicki; Oliver Schoppe; Michael Isik; Florian Völk; Werner Hemmert
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 5.249

4.  Binaural summation of amplitude modulation involves weak interaural suppression.

Authors:  D H Baker; G Vilidaite; E McClarnon; E Valkova; A Bruno; R E Millman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.