Literature DB >> 16838099

Radiographic texture analysis of densitometer-generated calcaneus images differentiates postmenopausal women with and without fractures.

T J Vokes1, M L Giger, M R Chinander, T G Karrison, M J Favus, L B Dixon.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Bone fragility is determined by bone mass, measured as bone mineral density (BMD), and by trabecular structure, which cannot be easily measured using currently available noninvasive methods. In previous studies, radiographic texture analysis (RTA) performed on the radiographic images of the spine, proximal femur, and os calcis differentiated subjects with and without osteoporotic fractures. The present cross-sectional study was undertaken to determine whether such differentiation could also be made using high-resolution os calcis images obtained on a peripheral densitometer.
METHODS: In 170 postmenopausal women (42 with and 128 without prevalent vertebral fractures) who had no secondary causes of osteoporosis and were not receiving treatment for osteoporosis, BMD of the lumbar spine, proximal femur, and os calcis was measured using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Vertebral fractures were diagnosed on densitometric spine images. RTA, including Fourier-based and fractal analyses, was performed on densitometric images of os calcis.
RESULTS: BMD at all three sites and all texture features was significantly different in subjects with and without fractures, with the most significant differences observed for the femoral neck and total hip measurements and for the RTA feature Minkowski fractal (p<0.001). In univariate logistic regression analysis, Minkowski fractal predicted the presence of vertebral fractures as well as femoral neck BMD (p<0.001). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, both femoral neck BMD and Minkowski fractal yielded significant predictive effects (p=0.001), and when age was added to the model, the effect of RTA remained significant (p=0.002), suggesting that RTA reflects an aspect of bone fragility that is not captured by age or BMD. Finally, when RTA was compared in 42 fracture patients and 42 nonfracture patients matched for age and BMD, the RTA features were significantly different between the groups (p=0.003 to p=0.04), although BMD and age were not.
CONCLUSION: This study suggests that RTA of densitometer-generated calcaneus images provides an estimate of bone fragility independent of and complementary to BMD measurement and age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16838099     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-006-0089-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  52 in total

1.  Calling all vertebral fractures classification of vertebral compression fractures: a consensus for comparison of treatment and outcome.

Authors:  Tom Faciszewski; Fergus McKiernan
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 2.  Noninvasive assessment of bone density and structure using computed tomography and magnetic resonance.

Authors:  T Lang; P Augat; S Majumdar; X Ouyang; H K Genant
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging: three-dimensional trabecular bone architecture and biomechanical properties.

Authors:  S Majumdar; M Kothari; P Augat; D C Newitt; T M Link; J C Lin; T Lang; Y Lu; H K Genant
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Risk of hip fracture according to the World Health Organization criteria for osteopenia and osteoporosis.

Authors:  J A Kanis; O Johnell; A Oden; B Jonsson; C De Laet; A Dawson
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  In vivo assessment of trabecular bone structure using fractal analysis of distal radius radiographs.

Authors:  S Majumdar; T M Link; J Millard; J C Lin; P Augat; D Newitt; N Lane; H K Genant
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Changes in bone density and turnover explain the reductions in incidence of nonvertebral fractures that occur during treatment with antiresorptive agents.

Authors:  Marc C Hochberg; Susan Greenspan; Richard D Wasnich; Paul Miller; Desmond E Thompson; Philip D Ross
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.958

7.  Severity of prevalent vertebral fractures and the risk of subsequent vertebral and nonvertebral fractures: results from the MORE trial.

Authors:  P D Delmas; H K Genant; G G Crans; J L Stock; M Wong; E Siris; J D Adachi
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W Browner; J Cauley; K Ensrud; H K Genant; L Palermo; J Scott; T M Vogt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Prevalent vertebral deformities: relationship to bone mineral density and spinal osteophytosis in elderly men and women.

Authors:  G Jones; C White; T Nguyen; P N Sambrook; P J Kelly; J A Eisman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Investigation of physical image quality indices of a bone densitometry system.

Authors:  Joel R Wilkie; Maryellen L Giger; Michael R Chinander; Tamara J Vokes; Robert M Nishikawa; Michael D Carlin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  18 in total

1.  Radiographic texture analysis in the characterization of trabecular patterns in periprosthetic osteolysis.

Authors:  Joel R Wilkie; Maryellen L Giger; Charles A Engh; Robert H Hopper; John M Martell
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Reproducibility and sources of variability in radiographic texture analysis of densitometric calcaneal images.

Authors:  Tamara J Vokes; Ann Pham; Joel Wilkie; Masha Kocherginsky; Siu-Ling Ma; Michael Chinander; Theodore Karrison; Octavia Bris; Maryellen L Giger
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2007-12-26       Impact factor: 2.617

3.  Trabecular bone structure analysis in the osteoporotic spine using a clinical in vivo setup for 64-slice MDCT imaging: comparison to microCT imaging and microFE modeling.

Authors:  Ahi S Issever; Thomas M Link; Marie Kentenich; Patrik Rogalla; Karsten Schwieger; Markus B Huber; Andrew J Burghardt; Sharmila Majumdar; Gerd Diederichs
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 4.  Anniversary paper: History and status of CAD and quantitative image analysis: the role of Medical Physics and AAPM.

Authors:  Maryellen L Giger; Heang-Ping Chan; John Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 5.  Utility of the trabecular bone score (TBS) in secondary osteoporosis.

Authors:  Fabio M Ulivieri; Barbara C Silva; Francesco Sardanelli; Didier Hans; John P Bilezikian; Renata Caudarella
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 6.  Clinical Evaluation of Bone Strength and Fracture Risk.

Authors:  Chantal M J de Bakker; Wei-Ju Tseng; Yihan Li; Hongbo Zhao; X Sherry Liu
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.096

7.  Bone texture analysis of human femurs using a new device (BMA™) improves failure load prediction.

Authors:  S Kolta; S Paratte; T Amphoux; S Persohn; S Campana; W Skalli; S Paternotte; J-N Argenson; J-M Bouler; O Gagey; C Roux
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Managing osteoporosis in ulcerative colitis: something new?

Authors:  Luca Petruccio Piodi; Alessandro Poloni; Fabio Massimo Ulivieri
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Experimental hip fracture load can be predicted from plain radiography by combined analysis of trabecular bone structure and bone geometry.

Authors:  P Pulkkinen; T Jämsä; E-M Lochmüller; V Kuhn; M T Nieminen; F Eckstein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-09-22       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Local topological analysis of densitometer-generated scan images of the proximal femur for differentiation between patients with hip fracture and age-matched controls.

Authors:  H F Boehm; J Lutz; A Horng; M Notohamiprodjo; A Panteleon; K-J Pfeifer; M Reiser
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.