Literature DB >> 18543716

Changes in inhibition during differential eyeblink conditioning with increased training.

Matthew M Campolattaro1, Kathleen M Schnitker, John H Freeman.   

Abstract

Three experiments examined inhibitory learning in rats, using Pavlovian and differential inhibitory eyeblink conditioning procedures. Experiment 1 was designed to compare summation and retardation effects following Pavlovian conditioned inhibition (A+/XA-) or differential inhibition (A+/X-) training using auditory and visual conditioned stimuli (CSs). After ten 100-trial sessions of training, both Pavlovian conditioned inhibition and differential inhibition produced a retardation effect. However, a summation effect was obtained only for rats given Pavlovian conditioned inhibition training. Experiment 2 showed that increasing differential inhibition training to twenty 100-trial sessions produced summation and retardation effects. In Experiment 3, rats were trained with either ten or twenty 100-trial sessions of intramodal inhibitory training with two tone CSs (2 kHz vs. 8 kHz). Summation and retardation effects were obtained after only 20 sessions of differential conditioning. The findings indicate that extensive training is needed to establish conditioned inhibition with intermodal or intramodal differential conditioning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18543716      PMCID: PMC2556363          DOI: 10.3758/lb.36.2.159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  12 in total

1.  Neuronal activity in the cerebellar interpositus and lateral pontine nuclei during inhibitory classical conditioning of the eyeblink response.

Authors:  J H Freeman; D A Nicholson
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1999-07-03       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Associative effects of Pavlovian differential inhibition of behaviour.

Authors:  D Jones; F Gonzalez-Lima
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.386

3.  INHIBITION OF AVOIDANCE BEHAVIOR.

Authors:  R A RESCORLA; V M LOLORDO
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1965-06

4.  Perirhinal cortex lesions impair feature-negative discrimination.

Authors:  Matthew M Campolattaro; John H Freeman
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2006-04-17       Impact factor: 2.877

5.  Stimulus specificity of concurrent recovery in the rabbit nictitating membrane response.

Authors:  Gabrielle Weidemann; E James Kehoe
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  A comparator view of Pavlovian and differential inhibition.

Authors:  Gonzalo P Urcelay; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2006-07

Review 7.  A layered network model of associative learning: learning to learn and configuration.

Authors:  E J Kehoe
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Purkinje cell loss by OX7-saporin impairs excitatory and inhibitory eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  Brian C Nolan; John H Freeman
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.912

9.  Differential effects of cerebellar inactivation on eyeblink conditioned excitation and inhibition.

Authors:  John H Freeman; Hunter E Halverson; Amy Poremba
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-01-26       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Neuronal correlates of conditioned inhibition of the eyeblink response in the anterior interpositus nucleus.

Authors:  Daniel A Nicholson; John H Freeman
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.912

View more
  4 in total

1.  Conditioned inhibition in a rodent model of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  John T Green; Amy C Chess; Cynthia J Conquest; Brittney A Yegla
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 1.912

2.  Examination of bilateral eyeblink conditioning in rats.

Authors:  Matthew M Campolattaro; John H Freeman
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.912

3.  Medial auditory thalamic input to the lateral pontine nuclei is necessary for auditory eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  Hunter E Halverson; John H Freeman
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2009-08-23       Impact factor: 2.877

4.  Cross-modal savings in the contralateral eyelid conditioned response.

Authors:  Matthew M Campolattaro; Eric W Buss; John H Freeman
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 1.912

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.