Literature DB >> 16830217

Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing two different circular staplers for mucosectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids.

Antonio Arroyo1, Francisco Pérez-Vicente, Elena Miranda, Ana Sánchez, Pilar Serrano, Fernando Candela, Israel Oliver, Rafael Calpena.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The main objections against circular stapled mucosectomy have been anal pain and rectal bleeding during the surgical procedure or in the immediate postoperative follow-up. To avoid these consequences, a new stapler (PPH33-03) has been developed. The aim of this trial was to compare the intraoperative and short-term postoperative morbidity of stapled mucosectomy with PPH33-01 versus PPH33-03 in the treatment of hemorrhoids.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective randomized clinical trial comparing hemorrhoidectomy with PPH33-01 (group 1, n=30) versus PPH33-03 (group 2, n=30) for grade III-IV symptomatic hemorrhoids. For the follow-up, the patients underwent examination and proctoscopy at 4 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. We recorded anal pain (linear analog scale from 0 to 10), intraoperative hemorrhage, postoperative bleeding, and continence (Wexner Continence Grading Scale).
RESULTS: Demographic and clinical features showed no differences between the two groups. More patients required suture ligation to stop anastomotic bleeding at surgery when the PPH33-01 stapler was used (15 versus 4, P<0.05). Rectal bleeding during the first postoperative 4 weeks was similar (P>0.05). The postoperative pain scores during the first week were similar (P>0.05). Patients with pain on defecation were fewer in the PPH-03 group (15 versus 2, P<0.05). Six patients from group 1 and none from group 2 (P<0.05) had granulomas along the line of staples at the sites of the reinforcing stitches; the granulomas were associated with postoperative anal discomfort and rectal bleeding. One patient in group 1 complained of persistent pain that resolved within 3 months. Of all the intraoperative or preoperative variables analyzed, only the presence of granuloma was associated with postoperative bleeding and anal discomfort. We have not found any recurrence or incontinence during the 6-month follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative bleeding along the stapled line and tenesmus or discomfort during defecation were less frequent after circular stapled mucosectomy with PPH33-03. Therefore, circular stapled mucosectomy with PPH33-03 decreases the risk of immediate complications and thus allows implantation with more safety as a day surgery procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16830217     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-005-0222-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  17 in total

1.  Pain after stapled haemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  A Herold; J J Kirsch
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000 Dec 23-30       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Pain after stapled haemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  G C Beattie; M A Loudon
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000 Dec 23-30       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Residual staples as a possible cause of recurrent rectal bleeding after stapled haemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  H M Quah; H I A Hadi; D J Hay; A Maw
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.788

4.  Stapled versus excision haemorrhoidectomy: long-term follow up of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Edward F Smyth; Richard P Baker; Bert J Wilken; John E Hartley; Tim J White; John R T Monson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-04-26       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Circular stapled anopexy for haemorrhoidal disease: results.

Authors:  P A Lehur; J F Gravié; G Meurette
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.788

6.  Prospective randomised clinical trial of single versus double purse-string stapled mucosectomy in the treatment of prolapsed haemorrhoids.

Authors:  Francisco Pérez-Vicente; Antonio Arroyo; Pilar Serrano; Fernando Candela; Ana Sánchez; Rafael Calpena
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Persistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  M J Cheetham; N J Mortensen; P O Nystrom; M A Kamm; R K Phillips
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-08-26       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Stapled hemorrhoidectomy: surgical notes and results.

Authors:  Domenico Mascagni; Kenneth Paul Zeri; Filippo Maria Di Matteo; Nadia Peparini; Alessandro Maturo; Alberto Berni
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec

9.  Complications and results after stapled haemorrhoidopexy as a day surgical procedure.

Authors:  B Mlakar; P Kosorok
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.781

10.  Early experience with stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the United States.

Authors:  Marc A Singer; José R Cintron; James W Fleshman; Vivek Chaudhry; Elisa H Birnbaum; Thomas E Read; James S Spitz; Herand Abcarian
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  9 in total

1.  Tailored prolapse surgery for the treatment of haemorrhoids and obstructed defecation syndrome with a new dedicated device: TST STARR Plus.

Authors:  Gabriele Naldini; Jacopo Martellucci; Roberto Rea; Stefano Lucchini; Michele Schiano di Visconte; Angelo Caviglia; Claudia Menconi; Donglin Ren; Ping He; Domenico Mascagni
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Clinical Outcome Following Hemorrhoid Surgery: a Narrative Review.

Authors:  Marcello Picchio; Ettore Greco; Annalisa Di Filippo; Giuseppe Marino; Francesco Stipa; Erasmo Spaziani
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 0.656

3.  Postoperative complications in the treatment of rectal neoplasia by transanal endoscopic microsurgery: a prospective study of risk factors and time course.

Authors:  Carlos Frederico S Marques; Caio Sergio R Nahas; Ulysses Ribeiro; Leonardo A Bustamante; Rodrigo Ambar Pinto; Eduardo Kenzo Mory; Ivan Cecconello; Sergio Carlos Nahas
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Agraffectomy after low rectal stapling procedures for hemorrhoids and rectocele.

Authors:  S Petersen; J Jongen; W Schwenk
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialisation with mucopexy versus stapler haemorrhoidopexy: a randomised trial with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  P Lucarelli; M Picchio; M Caporossi; F De Angelis; A Di Filippo; F Stipa; E Spaziani
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Fecal urge incontinence after stapled anopexia for prolapse and hemorrhoids: a prospective, observational study.

Authors:  Johannes Schmidt; Nevzat Dogan; Ralf Langenbach; Hubert Zirngibl
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  [Rare complication after STARR operation].

Authors:  M Kessler; A K Joos; D Bussen
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 0.955

8.  Doppler-guided hemorrhoid artery ligation with Recto-Anal-Repair modification: functional evaluation and safety assessment of a new minimally invasive method of treatment of advanced hemorrhoidal disease.

Authors:  Piotr Walega; Michal Romaniszyn; Jakub Kenig; Roman Herman; Wojciech Nowak
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-04-01

9.  Indications, Feasibility, and Safety of TST STARR Plus Stapler for Degree III Hemorrhoids: A Retrospective Study of 125 Hemorrhoids Patients.

Authors:  Jun Wei; Xufeng Ding; Jie Jiang; Lijiang Ji; Hua Huang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-04-13
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.