Literature DB >> 26861635

Postoperative complications in the treatment of rectal neoplasia by transanal endoscopic microsurgery: a prospective study of risk factors and time course.

Carlos Frederico S Marques1, Caio Sergio R Nahas2, Ulysses Ribeiro2, Leonardo A Bustamante2, Rodrigo Ambar Pinto2, Eduardo Kenzo Mory2, Ivan Cecconello2, Sergio Carlos Nahas2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is a safe and efficient minimally invasive treatment for rectal benign and early malignant neoplasia, but postoperative complications may be severe. We aimed to evaluate the risk factors related to the incidence, severity, and time course of postoperative complications of TEM.
METHODS: This is a prospective study of postoperative complications in 53 patients (>18 years old) with benign or early rectal neoplasia who underwent TEM with curative intention or, for higher stages, palliation. Outcome measures included age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, lesion height and size, pathologic margins, tumor histology, and suture type.
RESULTS: Overall morbidity was 50 %. Temporary fecal incontinence was the most frequent complication (17.3 %). Complication rates of Clavien-Dindo grades I and II were 21.1 % and those of grades III and IV 3.8 %. Of patients with complications, more had lesions under the first rectal valve than over the first valve (61.54 % vs 38.46 %, p = 0.04). Patients submitted to chemoradiotherapy had a 24-fold greater chance of presenting grade II complications (p = 0.002). When the surgical defect was treated using the TEM device to perform the suture, the chance of having grade III complications was reduced 16-fold (p = 0.04). Fifty-three percent of complications occurred in the first 10 days and 95 % within 20 days.
CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative complications after transanal endoscopic microsurgery for the treatment of rectal neoplasia are frequent, acceptable, and usually controllable with pharmacologic treatment. Over time the nature of complications is continuous, centered on the first 20 days after surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Minimally invasive surgery; Organ-sparing treatment; Postoperative complications; Risk factors; Transanal endoscopic microsurgery

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26861635     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-016-2527-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  40 in total

1.  Transanal full-thickness excision of rectal tumours: should the defect be sutured? a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  J. M. Ramirez; V. Aguilella; D. Arribas; M. Martinez
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.788

2.  Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is superior to transanal excision of rectal adenomas.

Authors:  E J R de Graaf; J W A Burger; A L A van Ijsseldijk; G W M Tetteroo; I Dawson; W C J Hop
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 3.788

3.  Efficiency and outcomes of harmonic device in transanal endoscopic microsurgery compared with monopolar scalpel.

Authors:  J A Gracia; J M Ramirez; D Callejo; M Elia; S Maeso; V Aguilella; M Martinez
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: where are we now?

Authors:  Sushil Maslekar; Daniel L Beral; Tim J White; Steve H Pillinger; John R T Monson
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 2.588

5.  Transanal endoscopic microsurgery in small, large, and giant rectal adenomas.

Authors:  Andrea Scala; Gianpiero Gravante; Neville Dastur; Roberto Sorge; Jay N L Simson
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2012-12

Review 6.  Local surgical treatment of rectal cancer.

Authors:  G F Buess
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 9.162

7.  A prospective randomized study with a 5-year minimum follow-up evaluation of transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision after neoadjuvant therapy.

Authors:  G Lezoche; M Baldarelli; Mario Guerrieri; A M Paganini; A De Sanctis; S Bartolacci; E Lezoche
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Complications of transanal endoscopic microsurgery are rare and minor: a single institution's analysis and comparison to existing data.

Authors:  Anjali S Kumar; Jasna Coralic; Deirdre C Kelleher; Shafik Sidani; Kirthi Kolli; Lee E Smith
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Colorectal surgeons' learning curve of transanal endoscopic microsurgery.

Authors:  Renée M Barendse; Marcel G Dijkgraaf; Ursula R Rolf; Arnold B Bijnen; Esther C J Consten; Christiaan Hoff; Evelien Dekker; Paul Fockens; Willem A Bemelman; Eelco J R de Graaf
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Impact of transanal endoscopic microsurgery on functional outcome and quality of life.

Authors:  P G Doornebosch; M P Gosselink; P A Neijenhuis; W R Schouten; R A E M Tollenaar; E J R de Graaf
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Should the rectal defect be closed following transanal local excision of rectal tumors? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  B Menahem; A Alves; R Morello; J Lubrano
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Fecal incontinence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery.

Authors:  Matas Jakubauskas; Valdemaras Jotautas; Eligijus Poskus; Saulius Mikalauskas; Gintare Valeikaite-Tauginiene; Kestutis Strupas; Tomas Poskus
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 2.571

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.