Literature DB >> 12727401

Stapled versus excision haemorrhoidectomy: long-term follow up of a randomised controlled trial.

Edward F Smyth1, Richard P Baker, Bert J Wilken, John E Hartley, Tim J White, John R T Monson.   

Abstract

Advantages of the stapling procedure for haemorrhoids include reduced postoperative pain and shortened convalescence; however, there are few data with respect to functional and symptomatic outcome. At a dedicated clinic, we reviewed patients between Dec, 2001, and March, 2002, who had taken part in a randomised controlled trial undertaken at the unit in 1999, which compared outcomes after open or stapled haemorrhoidectomy. We noted the presence or absence of haemorrhoid specific symptoms, and assessed overall satisfaction, continence, and quality of life. Rigid sigmoidoscopy and an anorectal examination were also used to examine symptomatic recurrence and disease activity. At minimum follow-up of 33 months since surgery, both techniques seem to be equally effective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12727401     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13106-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  19 in total

1.  Surgical management of hemorrhoids.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  The safety and efficacy of stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis of ten randomized control trials.

Authors:  Ping Lan; Xjiaojian Wu; Xuyu Zhou; Jianping Wang; Longjuan Zhang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-06-22       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  Stapled haemorrhoidopexy compared to Milligan-Morgan and Ferguson haemorrhoidectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  K Laughlan; D G Jayne; D Jackson; F Rupprecht; G Ribaric
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Quality of life after stapler haemorrhoidectomy evaluated by SF-36 questionnaire.

Authors:  Ahmet Erdoğdu; Nurver Turfaner Sipahioğlu; Ethem Erginöz; Berat Apaydın; Fikret Sipahioğlu
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2013-06-01

5.  Residual skin tags following procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids: differentiation from recurrence.

Authors:  Xian Hua Gao; Chuan Gang Fu; Paul Fallah-Wandalachi Nabieu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Complications, recurrences, early and late reoperations after stapled haemorrhoidopexy: lessons learned from 1,233 cases.

Authors:  Johannes Jongen; Anne Eberstein; Jens-Uwe Bock; Hans-Günter Peleikis; Volker Kahlke
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing two different circular staplers for mucosectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids.

Authors:  Antonio Arroyo; Francisco Pérez-Vicente; Elena Miranda; Ana Sánchez; Pilar Serrano; Fernando Candela; Israel Oliver; Rafael Calpena
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 8.  Clinical Outcome Following Hemorrhoid Surgery: a Narrative Review.

Authors:  Marcello Picchio; Ettore Greco; Annalisa Di Filippo; Giuseppe Marino; Francesco Stipa; Erasmo Spaziani
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 0.656

9.  Transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialisation with mucopexy versus stapler haemorrhoidopexy: a randomised trial with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  P Lucarelli; M Picchio; M Caporossi; F De Angelis; A Di Filippo; F Stipa; E Spaziani
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  Stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy in circumferential third-degree hemorrhoids: long-term results of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jong-Sun Kim; Yogesh K Vashist; Sabrina Thieltges; Oliver Zehler; Karim A Gawad; Emre F Yekebas; Jakob R Izbicki; Asad Kutup
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.