Literature DB >> 19034570

Fecal urge incontinence after stapled anopexia for prolapse and hemorrhoids: a prospective, observational study.

Johannes Schmidt1, Nevzat Dogan, Ralf Langenbach, Hubert Zirngibl.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stapled anopexia was introduced as a surgical method in 1993. Long-term data with special interest in functional results and relapse symptoms are rarely presented. Urinary discomfort and problems with fecal urge incontinence are addressed as severe side effects. We present our long-term results (using data from a high-volume center) with this technique and two surgeons' experience.
METHODS: During 4 years, a total of 546 patients entered the study. For long-term evaluation, 452 patients (237 women and 215 men) were available (82.9%). Patients with recurrent hemorrhoidal prolapse and fecal incontinence were excluded. Postoperative reevaluation with physical condition was performed after 1, 6, and 24 months by means of manometry, rectoscopy, and SF-36 Health Survey Test.
RESULTS: Early postoperative urinary impairment was 7.3%. Early fecal urge incontinence rate was 3.3%. Overall perioperative complication rate was 11.1%. Within 1 month, the rate of fecal urge incontinence increased to 13.5% and decreased to 4% and 2.9% after a period of 6 and 24 months. Overall recurrence rate was 3.3%. Reoperation rate according to the primary indication was 2.9% after 24 months. The SF-36 data showed a return to normal 1 month after the procedure was performed. Overall satisfaction rate was 95.4%.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that stapled anopexia is a safe and secure procedure for treatment of hemorrhoidal prolapse. Fecal urge incontinence is a self-limiting side effect that with which patients need to be made familiar.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19034570     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-008-9818-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  22 in total

1.  [The Longo and Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy. A prospective comparative study of 300 patients].

Authors:  J J Kirsch; G Staude; A Herold
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  [The SF-36 in the Federal Health Survey--description of a current normal sample].

Authors:  U Ellert; B M Bellach
Journal:  Gesundheitswesen       Date:  1999-12

3.  Persistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  S D Wexner
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 4.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing stapled haemorrhoidopexy with conventional haemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  W-J Shao; G-C H Li; Z H-K Zhang; B-L Yang; G-D Sun; Y-Q Chen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Influence of Parks' anal retractor on anal sphincter pressures.

Authors:  W F van Tets; J H Kuijpers; K Tran; R Mollen; H van Goor
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  [Anal pressures after stapler hemorrhoidectomy - a prospective analysis of 33 patients].

Authors:  G Weyand; F Webels; H Celebi; A Ommer; H Kohaus
Journal:  Zentralbl Chir       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 0.942

7.  Stapled vs excision hemorrhoidectomy: long-term results of a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Franc H Hetzer; Nicolas Demartines; Alexander E Handschin; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2002-03

8.  Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing two different circular staplers for mucosectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids.

Authors:  Antonio Arroyo; Francisco Pérez-Vicente; Elena Miranda; Ana Sánchez; Pilar Serrano; Fernando Candela; Israel Oliver; Rafael Calpena
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Long-term results after excision haemorrhoidectomy versus stapled haemorrhoidopexy for prolapsing haemorrhoids; a Belgian prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  J Van de Stadt; A D'Hoore; M Duinslaeger; E Chasse; F Penninckx
Journal:  Acta Chir Belg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.090

10.  Persistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  M J Cheetham; N J Mortensen; P O Nystrom; M A Kamm; R K Phillips
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-08-26       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Clinical Outcome Following Hemorrhoid Surgery: a Narrative Review.

Authors:  Marcello Picchio; Ettore Greco; Annalisa Di Filippo; Giuseppe Marino; Francesco Stipa; Erasmo Spaziani
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 0.656

2.  Stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy in circumferential third-degree hemorrhoids: long-term results of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jong-Sun Kim; Yogesh K Vashist; Sabrina Thieltges; Oliver Zehler; Karim A Gawad; Emre F Yekebas; Jakob R Izbicki; Asad Kutup
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Treatment of grade III and IV haemorrhoidal disease with PPH or THD. A randomized trial on postoperative complications and short-term results.

Authors:  Sebastiaan Festen; M J van Hoogstraten; A A W van Geloven; M F Gerhards
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  STAPLED HEMORRHOIDOPEXY: RESULTS, LATE COMPLICATIONS, AND DEGREE OF SATISFACTION AFTER 16 YEARS OF FOLLOW-UP.

Authors:  Carlos Walter Sobrado; Lucas Faraco Sobrado; Carlos Almeida Obregon; Helder Moura Villela; José Américo Bacchi Hora
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2022-09-16
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.