Literature DB >> 16825746

Simulations to design an online motion compensation system for scanned particle beams.

Sven Oliver Grözinger1, Eike Rietzel, Qiang Li, Christoph Bert, Thomas Haberer, Gerhard Kraft.   

Abstract

Respiration-induced target motion is a major problem in intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Beam segments are delivered serially to form the total dose distribution. In the presence of motion, the spatial relation between dose deposition from different segments will be lost. Usually, this results in over- and underdosage. Besides such interplay effects between target motion and dynamic beam delivery as known from photon therapy, changes in internal density have an impact on delivered dose for intensity-modulated charged particle therapy. In this study, we have analysed interplay effects between raster scanned carbon ion beams and target motion. Furthermore, the potential of an online motion strategy was assessed in several simulations. An extended version of the clinical treatment planning software was used to calculate dose distributions to moving targets with and without motion compensation. For motion compensation, each individual ion pencil beam tracked the planned target position in the lateral as well as longitudinal direction. Target translations and rotations, including changes in internal density, were simulated. Target motion simulating breathing resulted in severe degradation of delivered dose distributions. For example, for motion amplitudes of +/-15 mm, only 47% of the target volume received 80% of the planned dose. Unpredictability of resulting dose distributions was demonstrated by varying motion parameters. On the other hand, motion compensation allowed for dose distributions for moving targets comparable to those for static targets. Even limited compensation precision (standard deviation approximately 2 mm), introduced to simulate possible limitations of real-time target tracking, resulted in less than 3% loss in dose homogeneity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16825746     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/14/016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  21 in total

Review 1.  Treatment planning optimisation in proton therapy.

Authors:  S E McGowan; N G Burnet; A J Lomax
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Exploratory Study of 4D versus 3D Robust Optimization in Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Wei Liu; Steven E Schild; Joe Y Chang; Zhongxing Liao; Yu-Hui Chang; Zhifei Wen; Jiajian Shen; Joshua B Stoker; Xiaoning Ding; Yanle Hu; Narayan Sahoo; Michael G Herman; Carlos Vargas; Sameer Keole; William Wong; Martin Bues
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Impact of respiratory motion on worst-case scenario optimized intensity modulated proton therapy for lung cancers.

Authors:  Wei Liu; Zhongxing Liao; Steven E Schild; Zhong Liu; Heng Li; Yupeng Li; Peter C Park; Xiaoqiang Li; Joshua Stoker; Jiajian Shen; Sameer Keole; Aman Anand; Mirek Fatyga; Lei Dong; Narayan Sahoo; Sujay Vora; William Wong; X Ronald Zhu; Martin Bues; Radhe Mohan
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-09-11

4.  Impact of Spot Size and Spacing on the Quality of Robustly Optimized Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Plans for Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Chenbin Liu; Steven E Schild; Joe Y Chang; Zhongxing Liao; Shawn Korte; Jiajian Shen; Xiaoning Ding; Yanle Hu; Yixiu Kang; Sameer R Keole; Terence T Sio; William W Wong; Narayan Sahoo; Martin Bues; Wei Liu
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Interplay effects in proton scanning for lung: a 4D Monte Carlo study assessing the impact of tumor and beam delivery parameters.

Authors:  S Dowdell; C Grassberger; G C Sharp; H Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Effect of novel amplitude/phase binning algorithm on commercial four-dimensional computed tomography quality.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Olsen; Wei Lu; James P Hubenschmidt; Michelle M Nystrom; Paul Klahr; Jeffrey D Bradley; Daniel A Low; Parag J Parikh
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) interplay effect evaluation of asymmetric breathing with simultaneous uncertainty considerations in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jie Shan; Yunze Yang; Steven E Schild; Thomas B Daniels; William W Wong; Mirek Fatyga; Martin Bues; Terence T Sio; Wei Liu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 8.  Particle therapy of moving targets-the strategies for tumour motion monitoring and moving targets irradiation.

Authors:  Tomasz Kubiak
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  The risk of developing a second cancer after receiving craniospinal proton irradiation.

Authors:  Wayne D Newhauser; Jonas D Fontenot; Anita Mahajan; David Kornguth; Marilyn Stovall; Yuanshui Zheng; Phillip J Taddei; Dragan Mirkovic; Radhe Mohan; James D Cox; Shiao Woo
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Radiotherapy-induced malignancies: review of clinical features, pathobiology, and evolving approaches for mitigating risk.

Authors:  Steve Braunstein; Jean L Nakamura
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.