Literature DB >> 16822515

Patient-specific initial wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysms with a backward incremental method.

S de Putter1, B J B M Wolters, M C M Rutten, M Breeuwer, F A Gerritsen, F N van de Vosse.   

Abstract

Patient-specific wall stress simulations on abdominal aortic aneurysms may provide a better criterion for surgical intervention than the currently used maximum transverse diameter. In these simulations, it is common practice to compute the peak wall stress by applying the full systolic pressure directly on the aneurysm geometry as it appears in medical images. Since this approach does not account for the fact that the measured geometry is already experiencing a substantial load, it may lead to an incorrect systolic aneurysm shape. We have developed an approach to compute the wall stress on the true diastolic geometry at a given pressure with a backward incremental method. The method has been evaluated with a neo-Hookean material law for several simple test problems. The results show that the method can predict an unloaded configuration if the loaded geometry and the load applied are known. The effect of incorporating the initial diastolic stress has been assessed by using three patient-specific geometries acquired with cardiac triggered MR. The comparison shows that the commonly used approach leads to an unrealistically smooth systolic geometry and therefore provides an underestimation for the peak wall stress. Our backward incremental modelling approach overcomes these issues and provides a more plausible estimate for the systolic aneurysm volume and a significantly different estimate for the peak wall stress. When the approach is applied with a more complex material law which has been proposed specifically for abdominal aortic aneurysm similar effects are observed and the same conclusion can be drawn.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16822515     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.04.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  19 in total

Review 1.  Current progress in patient-specific modeling.

Authors:  Maxwell Lewis Neal; Roy Kerckhoffs
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 11.622

2.  A Methodology for the Derivation of Unloaded Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Geometry With Experimental Validation.

Authors:  Santanu Chandra; Vimalatharmaiyah Gnanaruban; Fabian Riveros; Jose F Rodriguez; Ender A Finol
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Progression of abdominal aortic aneurysm towards rupture: refining clinical risk assessment using a fully coupled fluid-structure interaction method.

Authors:  Michalis Xenos; Nicos Labropoulos; Suraj Rambhia; Yared Alemu; Shmuel Einav; Apostolos Tassiopoulos; Natzi Sakalihasan; Danny Bluestein
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  A forward incremental prestressing method with application to inverse parameter estimations and eye-specific simulations of posterior scleral shells.

Authors:  Rafael Grytz; J Crawford Downs
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 1.763

5.  Towards patient-specific risk assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  M Breeuwer; S de Putter; U Kose; L Speelman; K Visser; F Gerritsen; R Hoogeveen; R Krams; H van den Bosch; J Buth; T Gunther; B Wolters; E van Dam; F van de Vosse
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Immersed boundary-finite element model of fluid-structure interaction in the aortic root.

Authors:  Vittoria Flamini; Abe DeAnda; Boyce E Griffith
Journal:  Theor Comput Fluid Dyn       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 1.606

7.  A numerical model to predict abdominal aortic aneurysm expansion based on local wall stress and stiffness.

Authors:  F Helderman; I J Manoch; M Breeuwer; U Kose; O Schouten; M R M van Sambeek; D Poldermans; P T M Pattynama; W Wisselink; A F W van der Steen; R Krams
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 8.  The role of geometric and biomechanical factors in abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk assessment.

Authors:  Samarth S Raut; Santanu Chandra; Judy Shum; Ender A Finol
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.934

9.  Biomechanical rupture risk assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysms based on a novel probabilistic rupture risk index.

Authors:  Stanislav Polzer; T Christian Gasser
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-12-06       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  Finite-element-based matching of pre- and intraoperative data for image-guided endovascular aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Aurélien Duménil; Adrien Kaladji; Miguel Castro; Simon Esneault; Antoine Lucas; Michel Rochette; Cemil Göksu; Pascal Haigron
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 4.538

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.