Literature DB >> 26951951

Immersed boundary-finite element model of fluid-structure interaction in the aortic root.

Vittoria Flamini1, Abe DeAnda2, Boyce E Griffith3.   

Abstract

It has long been recognized that aortic root elasticity helps to ensure efficient aortic valve closure, but our understanding of the functional importance of the elasticity and geometry of the aortic root continues to e-volve as increasingly detailed in vivo imaging data become available. Herein, we describe a fluid-structure interaction model of the aortic root, including the aortic valve leaflets, the sinsuses of Valsalva, the aortic annulus, and the sinotubular junction, that employs a version of Peskin's immersed boundary (IB) method with a finite element (FE) description of the structural elasticity. As in earlier work, we use a fiber-based model of the valve leaflets, but this study extends earlier IB models of the aortic root by employing an incompressible hyperelastic model of the mechanics of the sinuses and ascending aorta using a constitutive law fit to experimental data from human aortic root tissue. In vivo pressure loading is accounted for by a backward displacement method that determines the unloaded configurations of the root model. Our model yields realistic cardiac output at physiological pressures, with low transvalvular pressure differences during forward flow, minimal regurgitation during valve closure, and realistic pressure loads when the valve is closed during diastole. Further, results from high-resolution computations indicate that although the detailed leaflet and root kinematics show some grid sensitivity, our IB model of the aortic root nonetheless produces essentially grid-converged flow rates and pressures at practical grid spacings for the high-Reynolds number flows of the aortic root. These results thereby clarify minimum grid resolutions required by such models when used as stand-alone models of the aortic valve as well as when used to provide models of the outflow valves in models of left ventricular fluid dynamics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aortic valve; finite difference method; finite element method; fluid-structure interaction; hyperelasticity; immersed boundary method; incompressible flow

Year:  2015        PMID: 26951951      PMCID: PMC4778980          DOI: 10.1007/s00162-015-0374-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Comput Fluid Dyn        ISSN: 0935-4964            Impact factor:   1.606


  40 in total

1.  Deformational dynamics of the aortic root: modes and physiologic determinants.

Authors:  P Dagum; G R Green; F J Nistal; G T Daughters; T A Timek; L E Foppiano; A F Bolger; N B Ingels; D C Miller
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-11-09       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  A fluid-structure interaction model of the aortic valve with coaptation and compliant aortic root.

Authors:  Gil Marom; Rami Haj-Ali; Ehud Raanani; Hans-Joachim Schäfers; Moshe Rosenfeld
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Comparative finite element model analysis of ascending aortic flow in bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve.

Authors:  Francesca Viscardi; Christian Vergara; Luca Antiga; Sabrina Merelli; Alessandro Veneziani; Giovanni Puppini; Giuseppe Faggian; Alessandro Mazzucco; Giovanni Battista Luciani
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.094

4.  Three-dimensional fluid-structure interaction simulation of bileaflet mechanical heart valve flow dynamics.

Authors:  Rui Cheng; Yong G Lai; Krishnan B Chandran
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 5.  Heart valve function: a biomechanical perspective.

Authors:  Michael S Sacks; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  Aortic root dynamics and surgery: from craft to science.

Authors:  Allen Cheng; Paul Dagum; D Craig Miller
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  A multiscale computational comparison of the bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves in relation to calcific aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Eli J Weinberg; Mohammad R Kaazempur Mofrad
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Systolic pressure gradients across the aortic valve and in the ascending aorta.

Authors:  T E Driscol; R W Eckstein
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1965-09

9.  Prestressing in finite deformation abdominal aortic aneurysm simulation.

Authors:  M W Gee; C Reeps; H H Eckstein; W A Wall
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Quasi-static image-based immersed boundary-finite element model of left ventricle under diastolic loading.

Authors:  Hao Gao; Huiming Wang; Colin Berry; Xiaoyu Luo; Boyce E Griffith
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 2.747

View more
  9 in total

1.  Image-based immersed boundary model of the aortic root.

Authors:  Ali Hasan; Ebrahim M Kolahdouz; Andinet Enquobahrie; Thomas G Caranasos; John P Vavalle; Boyce E Griffith
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 2.242

2.  Fluid-Structure Interaction Study of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Dynamics Using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics.

Authors:  Wenbin Mao; Kewei Li; Wei Sun
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 2.495

Review 3.  Biological aortic valve replacement: advantages and optimal indications of stentless compared to stented valve substitutes. A review.

Authors:  Reza Tavakoli; Pichoy Danial; Ahmed Hamid Oudjana; Peiman Jamshidi; Max Gassmann; Pascal Leprince; Guillaume Lebreton
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-01-10

4.  An Immersed Interface Method for Discrete Surfaces.

Authors:  Ebrahim M Kolahdouz; Amneet Pal Singh Bhalla; Brent A Craven; Boyce E Griffith
Journal:  J Comput Phys       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 3.553

5.  On the Lagrangian-Eulerian Coupling in the Immersed Finite Element/Difference Method.

Authors:  Jae H Lee; Boyce E Griffith
Journal:  J Comput Phys       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 3.553

6.  Hybrid finite difference/finite element immersed boundary method.

Authors:  Boyce E Griffith; Xiaoyu Luo
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.747

7.  Fluid-Structure Interaction Models of Bioprosthetic Heart Valve Dynamics in an Experimental Pulse Duplicator.

Authors:  Jae H Lee; Alex D Rygg; Ebrahim M Kolahdouz; Simone Rossi; Stephen M Retta; Nandini Duraiswamy; Lawrence N Scotten; Brent A Craven; Boyce E Griffith
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  The Comparison of Different Constitutive Laws and Fiber Architectures for the Aortic Valve on Fluid-Structure Interaction Simulation.

Authors:  Li Cai; Ruihang Zhang; Yiqiang Li; Guangyu Zhu; Xingshuang Ma; Yongheng Wang; Xiaoyu Luo; Hao Gao
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  Immersed Boundary Models for Quantifying Flow-Induced Mechanical Stimuli on Stem Cells Seeded on 3D Scaffolds in Perfusion Bioreactors.

Authors:  Yann Guyot; Bart Smeets; Tim Odenthal; Ramesh Subramani; Frank P Luyten; Herman Ramon; Ioannis Papantoniou; Liesbet Geris
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 4.475

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.