Literature DB >> 16822151

Generation and context memory.

Neil W Mulligan1, Jeffrey P Lozito, Zachary A Rosner.   

Abstract

Generation enhances memory for occurrence but may not enhance other aspects of memory. The present study further delineates the negative generation effect in context memory reported in N. W. Mulligan (2004). First, the negative generation effect occurred for perceptual attributes of the target item (its color and font) but not for extratarget aspects of context (location and background color). Second, nonvisual generation tasks with either semantic or nonsemantic generation rules (antonym and rhyme generation, respectively) produced the same pattern of results. In contrast, a visual (or data-driven) generation task (letter transposition) did not disrupt context memory for color. Third, generating nonwords produced no effect on item memory but persisted in producing a negative effect on context memory for target attributes, implying that (a) the negative generation effect in context memory is not mediated by semantic encoding, and (b) the negative effect on context memory can be dissociated from the positive effect on item memory. The results are interpreted in terms of the processing account of generation. The original, perceptual-conceptual version of this account is too narrow, but a modified processing account, based on a more generic visual versus nonvisual processing distinction, accommodates the results. Copyright 2006 APA, all rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16822151     DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.4.836

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  9 in total

1.  The effects of generation on auditory implicit memory.

Authors:  Ilana T Z Dew; Neil W Mulligan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-09

2.  Memory for conversation and the development of common ground.

Authors:  Geoffrey L McKinley; Sarah Brown-Schmidt; Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-11

3.  Examining the relationship between generation constraint and memory.

Authors:  Matthew P McCurdy; Andrea N Frankenstein; Allison M Sklenar; Pauline Urban Levy; Eric D Leshikar
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-01-07

4.  A Positive Generation Effect on Memory for Auditory Context.

Authors:  Amy A Overman; Alison G Richard; Joseph D W Stephens
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-06

5.  Putting congeniality effects into context: Investigating the role of context in attitude memory using multiple paradigms.

Authors:  Emily R Waldum; Lili Sahakyan
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 3.059

6.  Where is the forgetting with list-method directed forgetting in recognition?

Authors:  Lili Sahakyan; Emily R Waldum; Aaron S Benjamin; Samuel P Bickett
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-06

7.  Executive Resources and Item-Context Binding: Exploring the Influence of Concurrent Inhibition, Updating, and Shifting Tasks on Context Memory.

Authors:  Marek Nieznański; Michał Obidziński; Emilia Zyskowska; Daria Niedziałkowska
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2015-09-30

Review 8.  Using Self-Generated Cues to Facilitate Recall: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Rebecca L Wheeler; Fiona Gabbert
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-10-27

9.  Enhanced memory for context associated with corrective feedback: evidence for episodic processes in errorful learning.

Authors:  Amy A Overman; Joseph D W Stephens; Mary F Bernhardt
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2021-07-26
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.