Literature DB >> 34309487

Enhanced memory for context associated with corrective feedback: evidence for episodic processes in errorful learning.

Amy A Overman1, Joseph D W Stephens2, Mary F Bernhardt1.   

Abstract

Numerous studies have established that there are benefits of corrective feedback for learning, but the mechanisms of this benefit are not well understood. An important question is whether corrective feedback improves memory via episodic processes or solely via semantic mediation. If episodic processes are involved, then memory for corrective feedback should include contextual details of the feedback episode. The present study tested this hypothesis across 3 experiments (total n = 223) in which participants completed an encoding task that involved cued guessing of category exemplars. Exemplars generated by participants were equally likely to be treated as correct or incorrect, and the "correct" exemplar was presented within a feedback display after each response. Separate versions of the task manipulated font colour in either the feedback display or the initial cue/typed response display. Participants were instructed to remember either the correct exemplars or their own typed responses, and the corresponding font colours. Retrieval task (cued recall, free recall, recognition) was varied across experiments. Across all 3 experiments, a higher rate of memory accuracy was observed for context associated with corrective feedback relative to other conditions. The findings are consistent with the hypothesis that errorful learning involves episodic memory, not merely semantic mediation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Memory; context; corrective feedback; generation

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34309487      PMCID: PMC8440464          DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2021.1957937

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Memory        ISSN: 0965-8211


  40 in total

1.  Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling.

Authors:  W H Batchelder; D M Riefer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-03

2.  Generation and memory for contextual detail.

Authors:  Neil W Mulligan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Why testing improves memory: mediator effectiveness hypothesis.

Authors:  Mary A Pyc; Katherine A Rawson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  When and why a failed test potentiates the effectiveness of subsequent study.

Authors:  Matthew Jensen Hays; Nate Kornell; Robert A Bjork
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Semantic information activated during retrieval contributes to later retention: Support for the mediator effectiveness hypothesis of the testing effect.

Authors:  Shana K Carpenter
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Toward an episodic context account of retrieval-based learning: dissociating retrieval practice and elaboration.

Authors:  Melissa Lehman; Megan A Smith; Jeffrey D Karpicke
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  How generation affects source memory.

Authors:  Kindiya D Geghman; Kristi S Multhaup
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-07

8.  The attentional boost effect and context memory.

Authors:  Neil W Mulligan; S Adam Smith; Pietro Spataro
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Errorful and errorless learning: The impact of cue-target constraint in learning from errors.

Authors:  Emma K Bridger; Axel Mecklinger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-08

10.  Why does guessing incorrectly enhance, rather than impair, retention?

Authors:  Veronica X Yan; Yue Yu; Michael A Garcia; Robert A Bjork
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.