Literature DB >> 27696145

A Positive Generation Effect on Memory for Auditory Context.

Amy A Overman1, Alison G Richard2, Joseph D W Stephens3.   

Abstract

Self-generation of information during memory encoding has large positive effects on subsequent memory for items, but mixed effects on memory for contextual information associated with items. A processing account of generation effects on context memory (Mulligan in Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(4), 838-855, 2004; Mulligan, Lozito, & Rosner in Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(4), 836-846, 2006) proposes that these effects depend on whether the generation task causes any shift in processing of the type of context features for which memory is being tested. Mulligan and colleagues have used this account to predict various negative effects of generation on context memory, but the account also predicts positive generation effects under certain circumstances. The present experiment provided a critical test of the processing account by examining how generation affected memory for auditory rather than visual context. Based on the processing account, we predicted that generation of rhyme words should enhance processing of auditory information associated with the words (i.e., voice gender), whereas generation of antonym words should have no effect. These predictions were confirmed, providing support to the processing account.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Context; Generation; Memory

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27696145      PMCID: PMC5374048          DOI: 10.3758/s13423-016-1169-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  9 in total

1.  Demonstrations of a generation effect in context memory.

Authors:  E J Marsh; G Edelman; G H Bower
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-09

2.  Generation and memory for contextual detail.

Authors:  Neil W Mulligan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Generation and context memory.

Authors:  Neil W Mulligan; Jeffrey P Lozito; Zachary A Rosner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Positive and negative generation effects in source monitoring.

Authors:  David M Riefer; Yuchin Chien; Jason F Reimer
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.143

5.  Generation difficulty and memory for source.

Authors:  Marek Nieznański
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 2.143

6.  Generation disrupts memory for intrinsic context but not extrinsic context.

Authors:  Neil W Mulligan
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 2.143

Review 7.  Source monitoring.

Authors:  M K Johnson; S Hashtroudi; D S Lindsay
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  Monitoring item and source information: evidence for a negative generation effect in source memory.

Authors:  P J Jurica; A P Shimamura
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-07

9.  How generation affects source memory.

Authors:  Kindiya D Geghman; Kristi S Multhaup
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-07
  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Enhanced memory for context associated with corrective feedback: evidence for episodic processes in errorful learning.

Authors:  Amy A Overman; Joseph D W Stephens; Mary F Bernhardt
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2021-07-26
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.