Literature DB >> 33415716

Examining the relationship between generation constraint and memory.

Matthew P McCurdy1, Andrea N Frankenstein1, Allison M Sklenar1, Pauline Urban Levy1, Eric D Leshikar2.   

Abstract

Self-generated information is often better remembered than read information (the generation effect). Recent research, however, has shown that generating information under fewer experimental constraints (i.e., fewer limitations on what can be generated) can increase the magnitude of the generation effect. This study systematically varied generation constraint to better understand the effects of constraint on memory. Participants encoded associated cue-target word pairs (above-below) on either the left or right side of a computer monitor. At encoding, generation constraint was manipulated by systematically varying the number of letters given to participants to generate the target word (i.e., above-below; option-choic_; bank-mon__; etc.). At retrieval, participants were given either a recognition, cued recall, or free recall test measuring both item (target word) and context memory (location on the computer monitor). Using mixed-effects logistic regression analyses to control for item-selection effects (e.g., participants producing idiosyncratic targets in some conditions relative to others), results indicated that generation constraint significantly influenced item, but not context (location) memory. The relationship between generation constraint and memory performance, however, differed by the type of memory test administered: Recognition data revealed a curvilinear relationship; cued recall showed a negative, linear relationship; and free recall showed no significant relationship. Overall, these findings provide more evidence that generation constraint has a strong yet complex effect on different aspects of memory, and further delineates some boundary conditions of the influence of generation constraint on memory.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Context memory; Generation constraint; Generation effect; Item memory

Year:  2021        PMID: 33415716     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-020-01119-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  20 in total

1.  Medial prefrontal cortex supports source memory accuracy for self-referenced items.

Authors:  Eric D Leshikar; Audrey Duarte
Journal:  Soc Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 2.083

2.  Future thinking about social targets: The influence of prediction outcome on memory.

Authors:  Andrea N Frankenstein; Matthew P McCurdy; Allison M Sklenar; Rhiday Pandya; Karl K Szpunar; Eric D Leshikar
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2020-07-22

3.  Mobilization of cognitive resources and the generation effect.

Authors:  K Fiedler; H Lachnit; D Fay; C Krug
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1992-07

4.  When does generation enhance memory for location?

Authors:  Elizabeth J Marsh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses.

Authors:  Franz Faul; Edgar Erdfelder; Axel Buchner; Albert-Georg Lang
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2009-11

6.  Improving Students' Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology.

Authors:  John Dunlosky; Katherine A Rawson; Elizabeth J Marsh; Mitchell J Nathan; Daniel T Willingham
Journal:  Psychol Sci Public Interest       Date:  2013-01

7.  Aging and source monitoring.

Authors:  S Hashtroudi; M K Johnson; L D Chrosniak
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1989-03

8.  Transcranial direct current stimulation of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during encoding improves recall but not recognition memory.

Authors:  Eric D Leshikar; Ryan C Leach; Matthew P McCurdy; Michael C Trumbo; Allison M Sklenar; Andrea N Frankenstein; Laura E Matzen
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Similarity to the Self Affects Memory for Impressions of Others.

Authors:  Eric D Leshikar; Angela H Gutchess
Journal:  J Appl Res Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-11-11

10.  Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation on associative memory.

Authors:  Laura E Matzen; Michael C Trumbo; Ryan C Leach; Eric D Leshikar
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.252

View more
  5 in total

1.  Exploring the relationship between retrieval practice, self-efficacy, and memory.

Authors:  Andrea N Frankenstein; Onyinye J Udeogu; Matthew P McCurdy; Allison M Sklenar; Eric D Leshikar
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-06-06

2.  Examining the influence of brain stimulation to the medial prefrontal cortex on the self-reference effect in memory.

Authors:  Camill Burden; Ryan C Leach; Allison M Sklenar; Pauline Urban Levy; Andrea N Frankenstein; Eric D Leshikar
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 2.708

3.  Predicting and remembering the behaviors of social targets: how prediction accuracy affects episodic memory.

Authors:  Onyinye J Udeogu; Andrea N Frankenstein; Allison M Sklenar; Pauline Urban Levy; Eric D Leshikar
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2022-04-09

4.  The reciprocal relationship between episodic memory and future thinking: How the outcome of predictions is subsequently remembered.

Authors:  Sneh P Patel; Matthew P McCurdy; Andrea N Frankenstein; Allison M Sklenar; Pauline Urban Levy; Karl K Szpunar; Eric D Leshikar
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 3.405

5.  STOP SHOUTING AT ME: The Influence of Case and Self-Referencing on Explicit and Implicit Memory.

Authors:  George O Ilenikhena; Haajra Narmawala; Allison M Sklenar; Matthew P McCurdy; Angela H Gutchess; Eric D Leshikar
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.