Literature DB >> 16812879

Effects Of Varying Sample- And Choice-stimulus Disparity On Symbolic Matching-to-sample Performance.

R Godfrey, M Davison.   

Abstract

Year:  1998        PMID: 16812879      PMCID: PMC1284665          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1998.69-311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


× No keyword cloud information.
  10 in total

1.  Effects of response disparity on stimulus and reinforcer control in human detection tasks.

Authors:  S Gallagher; B Alsop
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Quantitative analyses of matching-to-sample performance.

Authors:  B M Jones
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  A theory of attending and reinforcement in conditional discriminations.

Authors:  John A Nevin; Michael Davison; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Signal-detection analyses of conditional discrimination and delayed matching-to-sample performance.

Authors:  Brent Alsop
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Discriminability and sensitivity to reinforcer magnitude in a detection task.

Authors:  Brent Alsop; Melissa Porritt
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Empirical validation of a procedure to correct position and stimulus biases in matching-to-sample.

Authors:  Brian D Kangas; Marc N Branch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Reinforcer control by comparison-stimulus color and location in a delayed matching-to-sample task.

Authors:  Brent Alsop; B Max Jones
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Stimulus disparity and punisher control of human signal-detection performance.

Authors:  Celia Lie; Brent Alsop
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Matching-to-sample performance is better analyzed in terms of a four-term contingency than in terms of a three-term contingency.

Authors:  Brent M Jones; Douglas M Elliffe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Assessing human performance during contingency changes and extinction tests in reversal-learning tasks.

Authors:  Carolyn M Ritchey; Shawn P Gilroy; Toshikazu Kuroda; Christopher A Podlesnik
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 1.986

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.