Literature DB >> 16602375

Discriminability and sensitivity to reinforcer magnitude in a detection task.

Brent Alsop1, Melissa Porritt.   

Abstract

Three pigeons discriminated between two sample stimuli (intensities of red light). The difficulty of the discrimination was varied over four levels. At each level, the relative reinforcer magnitude for the two correct responses was varied across conditions, and the reinforcer rates were equal. Within levels, discriminability between the sample stimuli did not change systematically as reinforcer magnitude varied. Across levels, the sensitivity of behavior to changes in the reinforcer-magnitude ratio decreased as the discriminability between the sample stimuli increased. Subsequent analysis showed that this relation was limited to performance following only one of the sample stimuli, the dim red light that remained constant across all conditions. Extant behavioral models of signal detection cannot easily accommodate these results.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16602375      PMCID: PMC1397790          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2006.91-04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  19 in total

Review 1.  Hyperbolic value addition and general models of animal choice.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Concurrent responding with fixed relative rate of reinforcement.

Authors:  D A Stubbs; S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The relation between the generalized matching law and signal-detection theory.

Authors:  M C Davison; R D Tustin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Stimuli, reinforcers, and behavior: an integration.

Authors:  M Davison; J Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Effects Of Varying Sample- And Choice-stimulus Disparity On Symbolic Matching-to-sample Performance.

Authors:  R Godfrey; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Effects of varying stimulus disparity and the reinforcer ratio in concurrent-schedule and signal-detection procedures.

Authors:  B Alsop; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Reinforcer frequency and reinforcer duration as biasers of signal detection.

Authors:  J Boldero; M Davison; D McCarthy
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  Isobias and alloiobias functions in animal psycophysics.

Authors:  D McCarthy; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1984-07

10.  Towards a behavioral theory of bias in signal detection.

Authors:  D McCarthy; M Davison
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-04
View more
  7 in total

1.  Rapid acquisition of bias in signal detection: dynamics of effective reinforcement allocation.

Authors:  Blake A Hutsell; Eric A Jacobs
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Applying signal-detection theory to the study of observer accuracy and bias in behavioral assessment.

Authors:  Dorothea C Lerman; Allison Tetreault; Alyson Hovanetz; Emily Bellaci; Jonathan Miller; Hilary Karp; Angela Mahmood; Maggie Strobel; Shelley Mullen; Alice Keyl; Alexis Toupard
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2010

3.  A theory of attending, remembering, and reinforcement in delayed matching to sample.

Authors:  John A Nevin; Michael Davison; Amy L Odum; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Adaptive criterion setting in perceptual decision making.

Authors:  Maik C Stüttgen; Ali Yildiz; Onur Güntürkün
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Effects of point-loss punishers on human signal-detection performance.

Authors:  Celia Lie; Brent Alsop
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Stimulus disparity and punisher control of human signal-detection performance.

Authors:  Celia Lie; Brent Alsop
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Pigeons (Columba livia) approach Nash equilibrium in experimental Matching Pennies competitions.

Authors:  Federico Sanabria; Eric Thrailkill
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.468

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.