Literature DB >> 18540217

Reinforcer control by comparison-stimulus color and location in a delayed matching-to-sample task.

Brent Alsop1, B Max Jones.   

Abstract

Six pigeons were trained in a delayed matching-to-sample task involving bright- and dim-yellow samples on a central key, a five-peck response requirement to either sample, a constant 1.5-s delay, and the presentation of comparison stimuli composed of red on the left key and green on the right key or vice versa. Green-key responses were occasionally reinforced following the dimmer-yellow sample, and red-key responses were occasionally reinforced following the brighter-yellow sample. Reinforcer delivery was controlled such that the distribution of reinforcers across both comparison-stimulus color and comparison-stimulus location could be varied systematically and independently across conditions. Matching accuracy was high throughout. The ratio of left to right side-key responses increased as the ratio of left to right reinforcers increased, the ratio of red to green responses increased as the ratio of red to green reinforcers increased, and there was no interaction between these variables. However, side-key biases were more sensitive to the distribution of reinforcers across key location than were comparison-color biases to the distribution of reinforcers across key color. An extension of Davison and Tustin's (1978) model of DMTS performance fit the data well, but the results were also consistent with an alternative theory of conditional discrimination performance (Jones, 2003) that calls for a conceptually distinct quantitative model.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18540217      PMCID: PMC2373768          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2008-89-311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  18 in total

1.  Quantitative analyses of matching-to-sample performance.

Authors:  B M Jones
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Delayed matching in the pigeon.

Authors:  D S BLOUGH
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1959-04       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The relation between the generalized matching law and signal-detection theory.

Authors:  M C Davison; R D Tustin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Stimuli, reinforcers, and behavior: an integration.

Authors:  M Davison; J Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Characteristics of forgetting functions in delayed matching to sample.

Authors:  K G White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Reporting contingencies of reinforcement in concurrent schedules.

Authors:  B Jones; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Three-configuration matching-to-sample in the pigeon.

Authors:  A C Kamil; R A Sacks
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  The interaction between stimulus and reinforcer control on remembering.

Authors:  D C McCarthy; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Effects of varying stimulus disparity and the reinforcer ratio in concurrent-schedule and signal-detection procedures.

Authors:  B Alsop; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Delayed discrimination and delayed matching in pigeons.

Authors:  L Smith
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  1 in total

1.  Matching-to-sample performance is better analyzed in terms of a four-term contingency than in terms of a three-term contingency.

Authors:  Brent M Jones; Douglas M Elliffe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 2.468

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.