Literature DB >> 21279163

Titrating-delay matching-to-sample in the pigeon.

Brian D Kangas1, Manish Vaidya, Marc N Branch.   

Abstract

The titrating-delay matching-to-sample (TDMTS) procedure offers researchers an additional behavioral task thought to capture some important features of remembering. In this procedure, the delay between sample offset and comparison onset adjusts as a function of the subject's performance. Specifically, correct matches increase the delay and incorrect matches decrease the delay, and steady-state titrated delays serve as the primary dependent measure. The present series of experiments investigated the effects of several procedural variables on performance in TDMTS procedures in an effort to elucidate better its features to allow for more precision in future use. Experiment 1 reports results from a parametric analysis of fixed-ratio response requirements on the sample key that indicated improved remembering in the form of higher daily titrated delay values as the requirement was increased. Experiment 2 investigated the extent to which the initial delay value in each session affected session-wide delay values. Results indicated that regardless of value of the initial delay, the subjects' performances adjusted the delay values in the direction of the known baseline delay-value levels. Experiment 3 manipulated the step size by which delay values were adjusted and the results indicated that larger step sizes increased both session-to-session variability and within-session range of titrated delay values, although the average values remained approximately the same. These results suggest that the TDMTS task serves as a promising procedure to study what many refer to as memory.

Keywords:  conditional discrimination; memory; pigeons; remembering; titrating-delay match-to-sample

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21279163      PMCID: PMC2893618          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2010.94-69

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  30 in total

1.  Properties of delay-period neuronal activity in the monkey dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during a spatial delayed matching-to-sample task.

Authors:  T Sawaguchi; I Yamane
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Sample-duration effects on pigeons' delayed matching as a function of predictability of duration.

Authors:  P J Urcuioli; T B DeMarse; K M Lionello
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  A computer-assisted cognitive test battery for aged monkeys.

Authors:  Jerry J Buccafusco; Alvin V Terry; Paul B Murdoch
Journal:  J Mol Neurosci       Date:  2002 Aug-Oct       Impact factor: 3.444

4.  Some data on matching behavior in the pigeon.

Authors:  W W CUMMING; R BERRYMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Characteristics of forgetting functions in delayed matching to sample.

Authors:  K G White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Effects of ethanol on working memory and attention in pigeons.

Authors:  C A Dayer; S Baron; K E Light; G R Wenger
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.030

7.  Early postnatal ethanol exposure has long-term effects on the performance of male rats in a delayed matching-to-place task in the Morris water maze.

Authors:  T A Girard; H C Xing; G R Ward; P E Wainwright
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.455

8.  Disruption of performance under a titrating matching-to-sample schedule of reinforcement by drugs of abuse.

Authors:  G R Wenger; D W Wright
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 4.030

9.  Linopirdine does not improve matching performance in the titrating matching-to-sample paradigm.

Authors:  A F Nordholm; E Moore; G R Wenger
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.533

10.  The differential outcomes effect: A demonstration in domestic chickens responding under a titrating-delayed-matching-to-sample procedure.

Authors:  A Poling; W Temple; T M Foster
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 1.777

View more
  8 in total

1.  Effects of acute and chronic cocaine administration on titrating-delay matching-to-sample performance.

Authors:  Brian D Kangas; Marc N Branch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Relations among acute and chronic nicotine administration, short-term memory, and tactics of data analysis.

Authors:  Brian D Kangas; Marc N Branch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Behavioral pharmacology of the odor span task: Effects of flunitrazepam, ketamine, methamphetamine and methylphenidate.

Authors:  Mark Galizio; Brooke April; Melissa Deal; Andrew Hawkey; Danielle Panoz-Brown; Ashley Prichard; Katherine Bruce
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Olfactory Stimulus Control and the Behavioral Pharmacology of Remembering.

Authors:  Mark Galizio
Journal:  Behav Anal (Wash D C)       Date:  2016-03-17

5.  Working-memory training: effects on delay discounting in male Long Evans rats.

Authors:  C Renee Renda; Jeffrey S Stein; Gregory J Madden
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2014-11-23       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Novel Antimuscarinic Antidepressant-like Compounds with Reduced Effects on Cognition.

Authors:  Chad R Johnson; Brian D Kangas; Emily M Jutkiewicz; Gail Winger; Jack Bergman; Andrew Coop; James H Woods
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 4.402

7.  Effects of cannabinoid exposure on short-term memory and medial orbitofrontal cortex function and chemistry in adolescent female rhesus macaques.

Authors:  Stephen J Kohut; Lei Cao; Dionyssios Mintzopolous; Shan Jiang; Spyros P Nikas; Alexandros Makriyannis; Chun S Zou; J Eric Jensen; Blaise B Frederick; Jack Bergman; Brian D Kangas
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 5.152

8.  Impulsive choice predicts poor working memory in male rats.

Authors:  C Renee Renda; Jeffrey S Stein; Gregory J Madden
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.