Literature DB >> 16812149

Concurrent schedule assessment of food preference in cows.

L R Matthews, W Temple.   

Abstract

Six dairy cows (Bos taurus) were trained on several pairs of concurrent variable-interval schedules with different types of food available on each alternative. The required response was a plate press made by the animal's muzzle. Performance generally replicated that found with other species. The generalized matching law accounted for the preference data, showing that food preference could be quantitatively analyzed as a special case of response bias. The preference functions showed that the response- and time-allocation ratios were not as extreme as obtained reinforcement rate ratios (undermatching).

Entities:  

Year:  1979        PMID: 16812149      PMCID: PMC1332899          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1979.32-245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  11 in total

1.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Choice as time allocation.

Authors:  W M Baum; H C Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Performance on variable-interval schedules arranged singly and concurrently.

Authors:  M C Davison; I W Hunter
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Concurrent responding with fixed relative rate of reinforcement.

Authors:  D A Stubbs; S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Preference for qualitatively different reinforcers.

Authors:  V Hollard; M C Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Preference for fixed-interval schedules: an alternative model.

Authors:  M C Davison; W Temple
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Performance in concurrent interval schedules: a systematic replication.

Authors:  B Lobb; M C Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Matching-based hedonic scaling in the pigeon.

Authors:  H L Miller
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Changeover delay and concurrent schedules: some effects on relative performance measures.

Authors:  R L Shull; S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  22 in total

1.  The general matching law describes choice on concurrent variable-interval schedules of wheel-running reinforcement.

Authors:  T W Belke; J Belliveau
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Contingency discriminability, matching, and bias in the concurrent-schedule responding of possums (Trichosurus vulpecula).

Authors:  Angela Bron; Catherine E Sumpter; T Mary Foster; William Temple
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Behavior analysis and farm animal welfare.

Authors:  T M Foster; W Temple; A Poling
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1997

4.  Concurrent second-order schedules: some effects of variations in response number and duration.

Authors:  Diane M Sealey; Catherine E Sumpter; W Temple; T Mary Foster
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Effects of reinforcer rate and reinforcer quality on time allocation: Extensions of matching theory to educational settings.

Authors:  N A Neef
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1992

6.  Concurrent schedules: Quantifying the aversiveness of noise.

Authors:  T M McAdie; T M Foster; W Temple
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Sensitivity to reinforcement in concurrent arithmetic and exponential schedules.

Authors:  R Taylor; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Undermatching and overmatching as deviations from the matching law.

Authors:  J H Wearden
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Local rates of responding and reinforcement during concurrent schedules.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; C L Melville; M A Buck; J E Whipple
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Predicting and scaling hens' preferences for topographically different responses.

Authors:  C E Sumpter; T M Foster; W Temple
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.