Literature DB >> 16812544

Concurrent schedules: Interaction of reinforcer frequency and reinforcer duration.

M Davison.   

Abstract

Six pigeons were trained on concurrent variable-interval schedules with unequal reinforcer durations for the two responses. The schedules arranged on the two keys were kept equal while they were varied in absolute size. As the overall reinforcer rate was increased, both response-allocation and time-allocation measures of choice showed a trend toward indifference, and measures of sensitivity to reinforcer-duration ratios significantly decreased. Recent reports have shown that the generalized matching law cannot describe the changes in behavior allocation under constant delay-, duration-, or rate-ratios when changes are made in the absolute levels of each of these variables. The present results complement these findings by demonstrating that the concatenated generalized matching law cannot describe the interactions of two reinforcer variables on behavior allocation.

Year:  1988        PMID: 16812544      PMCID: PMC1338795          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1988.49-339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  29 in total

1.  Concurrent performances: a baseline for the study of reinforcement magnitude.

Authors:  A C CATANIA
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Concurrent responding with fixed relative rate of reinforcement.

Authors:  D A Stubbs; S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Choice for periodic schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  B Duncan; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Choice and delay of reinforcement.

Authors:  S H Chung; R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Choice behavior and the accessibility of the reinforcer.

Authors:  E Fantino; N Squires; N Delbrück; C Peterson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Effects on choice of reinforcement delay and conditioned reinforcement.

Authors:  B A Williams; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  A model for choice in simple concurrent and concurrent-chains schedules.

Authors:  N Squires; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  On the falsifiability of matching theory.

Authors:  J J McDowell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Effects of reinforcement magnitude on choice and rate of responding.

Authors:  A J Neuringer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  20 in total

1.  Sensitivity to relative reinforcer rate in concurrent schedules: independence from relative and absolute reinforcer duration.

Authors:  A P McLean; N M Blampied
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  An application of the matching law to evaluate the allocation of two- and three-point shots by college basketball players.

Authors:  T R Vollmer; J Bourret
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2000

3.  Concurrent schedules: reinforcer magnitude effects.

Authors:  Jason Landon; Michael Davison; Douglas Elliffe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Every reinforcer counts: reinforcer magnitude and local preference.

Authors:  Michael Davison; William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  The matching relation and situation-specific bias modulation in professional football play selection.

Authors:  Stephanie T Stilling; Thomas S Critchfield
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  On science and the discriminative law of effect.

Authors:  Michael Davison; John A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Independence of terminal-link entry rate and immediacy in concurrent chains.

Authors:  Mark E Berg; Randolph C Grace
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Does sensitivity to magnitude depend on the temporal distribution of reinforcement?

Authors:  Randolph C Grace; Orn Bragason
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  The effects of variable-interval reinforcement on academic engagement: a demonstration of matching theory.

Authors:  B K Martens; D G Lochner; S Q Kelly
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1992

10.  Choice between repleting/depleting patches: A concurrent-schedule procedure.

Authors:  M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.