Literature DB >> 16812355

The assumptions underlying the generalized matching law.

D Prelec.   

Abstract

Allen (1981) derived the power-function generalization of the matching law from a functional equation involving relative response rates on three concurrently available schedules of reinforcement. This paper defines the conditions (relative homogeneity and independence) under which a more general class of behavioral laws reduces to the power law. The proof also removes two deficiencies of Allen's result (discussed by Houston, 1982), which are, first, that his derivation produces a power law without a bias coefficient, and second, that it holds only for experiments with three or more concurrent schedules.

Year:  1984        PMID: 16812355      PMCID: PMC1347959          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1984.41-101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  8 in total

1.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Comment on Houston's arguments.

Authors:  C M Allen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Spaced responding and choice: a preliminary analysis.

Authors:  J E Staddon
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  On the exponent in the "generalized" matching equation.

Authors:  C M Allen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  The case against Allen's generalization of the matching law.

Authors:  A I Houston
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.468

  8 in total
  4 in total

1.  Concurrent choice: Effects of overall reinforcer rate and the temporal distribution of reinforcers.

Authors:  D Elliffe; B Alsop
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Quantitative analysis.

Authors:  J A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Concurrent-schedule performance: Effects of relative and overall reinforcer rate.

Authors:  B Alsop; D Elliffe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Relative reinforcer rates and magnitudes do not control concurrent choice independently.

Authors:  Douglas Elliffe; Michael Davison; Jason Landon
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.468

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.