Literature DB >> 16812382

Autocontingencies: Suppressive and accelerative effects of pairs of shocks superimposed on a positively reinforced operant baseline.

H Davis, J Memmott.   

Abstract

Previous research has shown that unsignaled shock may accelerate positively reinforced operant responding if each shock signals a subsequent shock-free period. In order to explore the boundary conditions of this effect, two experiments were performed. In Experiment 1, pairs of unsignaled shocks separated by 15, 30, 60, or 120 seconds resulted in suppressed responding during the briefest intershock interval, and in accelerated responding during the longer intervals. When the second shock in each pair signaled a shock-free period of at least 3 minutes, accelerated responding also followed offset of the second shock in all but the 30-second condition. In Experiment 2, the addition of a conditioned stimulus prior to each pair of shocks restored baseline responding, and eliminated accelerative control following the second shock only under the briefest inter-shock interval. The results are discussed in terms of the similarity between autocontingencies (shock/no-shock relations; Davis, Memmott, & Hurwitz, 1975) and recent modifications of the feature-positive procedure (e.g., Reberg & Memmott, 1979), which stress stimulus control by shock/no-shock relationships.

Year:  1984        PMID: 16812382      PMCID: PMC1348046          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1984.42-75

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  5 in total

1.  Effects of signals preceding and following shock on baseline responding during a conditioned-suppression procedure.

Authors:  H Davis; J Memmott; H M Hurwitz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Food delivery as a conditional stimulus: Feature-learning and memory in pigeons.

Authors:  S W Bottjer; E Hearst
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Conditioned suppression under positive, negative, and no contingency between conditioned and unconditioned stimuli.

Authors:  H Davis; R W McIntire
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Summation of excitatory and inhibitory control produced by traditional tone-shock contingencies and autocontingencies.

Authors:  H Davis; T Herrmann; D Shattuck
Journal:  Pavlov J Biol Sci       Date:  1979 Oct-Dec

5.  Shock as a signal for shock or no-shock: a feature-negative effect in conditioned suppression.

Authors:  D Reberg; J Memmott
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 2.468

  5 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  The role of US signal value in contingency, drug conditioning, and learned helplessness.

Authors:  M J Goddard
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-09

2.  Remote effects of aversive contingencies: Disruption of appetitive behavior by adjacent avoidance sessions.

Authors:  T D Hackenberg; P N Hineline
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 2.468

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.