Literature DB >> 16812480

Superstitious behavior in humans.

K Ono.   

Abstract

Twenty undergraduate students were exposed to single response-independent schedules of reinforcer presentation, fixed-time or variable-time, each with values of 30 and 60 s. The reinforcer was a point on a counter accompanied by a red lamp and a brief buzzer. Three color signals were presented, without consistent relation to reinforcer or to the subjects' behavior. Three large levers were available, but the subjects were not asked to perform any particular behavior. Three of the 20 subjects developed persistent superstitious behavior. One engaged in a pattern of lever-pulling responses that consisted of long pulls after a few short pulls; the second touched many things in the experimental booth; the third showed biased responding called sensory superstition. However, most subjects did not show consistent superstitious behavior. Reinforcers can operate effectively on human behavior even in the absence of a response-reinforcer contingency and can, in some cases, shape stable superstitious patterns. However, superstitious behavior is not a consistent outcome of exposure of human subjects to response-independent reinforcer deliveries.

Entities:  

Year:  1987        PMID: 16812480      PMCID: PMC1348309          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1987.47-261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  23 in total

1.  Experimental control of superstitious responding inhumans.

Authors:  A C CATANIA; D CUTTS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  DIFFERENTIAL RESPONSE RATES CORRELATED WITH THE PRESENCE OF "NEUTRAL" STIMULI.

Authors:  J D KIEFFER
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The discrimination of contingent from noncontingent reinforcement.

Authors:  J B APPEL; R H HISS
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1962-02

4.  Collateral behavior in humans.

Authors:  A BRUNER; S H REVUSKY
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-10       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  A second type of superstition in the pigeon.

Authors:  W H MORSE; B F SKINNER
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1957-06

6.  Stimulus bias in the absence of food reinforcement.

Authors:  D G Lander
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Eccentric stimuli on multiple fixed-interval schedules.

Authors:  J E Kello; N K Innis; J E Staddon
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Unsignalled delay of reinforcement in variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  O J Sizemore; K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Some temporal parameters of non-contingent reinforcement.

Authors:  G D Lachter
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  The basis of superstitious behavior: chance contingency, stimulus substitution, or appetitive behavior?

Authors:  W Timberlake; G A Lucas
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  17 in total

1.  Variable-time reinforcement schedules in the treatment of socially maintained problem behavior.

Authors:  C M Van Camp; D C Lerman; M E Kelley; S A Contrucci; C M Vorndran
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2000

2.  Beyond freedom and dignity at 40: comments on behavioral science, the future, and chance (2007).

Authors:  Sam Leigland
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2011

3.  The ultimate challenge: prove B. F. Skinner wrong.

Authors:  Paul Chance
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2007

Review 4.  Stimulus overselectivity four decades later: a review of the literature and its implications for current research in autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Bertram O Ploog
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2010-11

5.  History effects on induced and operant variability.

Authors:  Alessandra da Silva Souza; Josele Abreu-Rodrigues; Ana Amélia Baumann
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Noncontingent reinforcement, alternative reinforcement, and the matching law: a laboratory demonstration.

Authors:  Cheryl L Ecott; Thomas S Critchfield
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2004

7.  Superstition and belief as inevitable by-products of an adaptive learning strategy.

Authors:  Jan Beck; Wolfgang Forstmeier
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2007-03

8.  An experimental analysis of ongoing verbal behavior: reinforcement, verbal operants, and superstitious behavior.

Authors:  S Leigland
Journal:  Anal Verbal Behav       Date:  1996

9.  Measuring preschoolers' superstitious tendencies.

Authors:  Kelly J Sheehan; Jennifer Van Reet; Christopher M Bloom
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-07-22       Impact factor: 1.777

10.  Willingness towards cognitive engagement: a preliminary study based on a behavioural entropy approach.

Authors:  Elena Daprati; Angela Sirigu; Michel Desmurget; Eugenio Martinelli; Daniele Nico
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.