Literature DB >> 16811318

Stimulus bias in the absence of food reinforcement.

D G Lander.   

Abstract

Pigeons sometimes peck a key at different rates in the presence of different stimuli, even when the same schedule of reinforcement is correlated with each of these stimuli. The possibility that the occurrence of such stimulus bias is dependent on adventitious effects of food reinforcement in the presence of the stimuli was evaluated by correlating extinction with two stimuli. Both pigeons showed stimulus bias, indicating that the occurrence of this phenomenon is not critically dependent upon any effects of scheduled food reinforcements.

Year:  1968        PMID: 16811318      PMCID: PMC1338624          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  3 in total

1.  DIFFERENTIAL RESPONSE RATES CORRELATED WITH THE PRESENCE OF "NEUTRAL" STIMULI.

Authors:  J D KIEFFER
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  A second type of superstition in the pigeon.

Authors:  W H MORSE; B F SKINNER
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1957-06

3.  An analysis of the concepts of discrimination and preference.

Authors:  F W IRWIN
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1958-03
  3 in total
  6 in total

1.  Eliminating behavior with reinforcement.

Authors:  M D Zeiler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Differential reinforcement and signal detection.

Authors:  J A Nevin; K Olson; C Mandell; P Yarensky
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Superstitious behavior in humans.

Authors:  K Ono
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Color preference in pigeons: stimulus intensity and reinforcement contingency effects in the avoidance of blue stimuli.

Authors:  G B Biederman; K G McDonald; G A Heighington; M Vanayan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Alternative reinforcement increases resistance to change: Pavlovian or operant contingencies?

Authors:  J A Nevin; M E Tota; R D Torquato; R L Shull
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Sensory superstition on multiple interval schedules.

Authors:  B C Starr; J E Staddon
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 2.468

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.