Literature DB >> 26181743

Superstition and belief as inevitable by-products of an adaptive learning strategy.

Jan Beck1, Wolfgang Forstmeier2.   

Abstract

The existence of superstition and religious beliefs in most, if not all, human societies is puzzling for behavioral ecology. These phenomena bring about various fitness costs ranging from burial objects to celibacy, and these costs are not outweighed by any obvious benefits. In an attempt to resolve this problem, we present a verbal model describing how humans and other organisms learn from the observation of coincidence (associative learning). As in statistical analysis, learning organisms need rules to distinguish between real patterns and randomness. These rules, which we argue are equivalent to setting the level of α for rejection of the null hypothesis in statistics, are governed by risk management as well as by comparison to previous experiences. Risk management means that the cost of a possible type I error (superstition) has to be traded off against the cost of a possible type II error (ignorance). This trade-off implies that the occurrence of superstitious beliefs is an inevitable consequence of an organism's ability to learn from observation of coincidence. Comparison with previous experiences (as in Bayesian statistics) improves the chances of making the right decision. While this Bayesian approach is found in most learning organisms, humans have evolved a unique ability to judge from experiences whether a candidate subject has the power to mechanistically cause the observed effect. Such "strong" causal thinking evolved because it allowed humans to understand and manipulate their environment. Strong causal thinking, however, involves the generation of hypotheses about underlying mechanisms (i.e., beliefs). Assuming that natural selection has favored individuals that learn quicker and more successfully than others owing to (1) active search to detect patterns and (2) the desire to explain these patterns mechanistically, we suggest that superstition has evolved as a by-product of the first, and that belief has evolved as a by-product of the second.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Behavioral ecology; Causal thinking; Evolutionary psychology; Human behavior; Learning

Year:  2007        PMID: 26181743     DOI: 10.1007/BF02820845

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Nat        ISSN: 1045-6767


  11 in total

1.  Bayes offers a 'new' way to make sense of numbers.

Authors:  D Malakoff
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-11-19       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Experimental control of superstitious responding inhumans.

Authors:  A C CATANIA; D CUTTS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  A second type of superstition in the pigeon.

Authors:  W H MORSE; B F SKINNER
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1957-06

Review 4.  A cognitive neuroscience framework for understanding causal reasoning and the law.

Authors:  Jonathan A Fugelsang; Kevin N Dunbar
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2004-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Superstition: a matter of bias, not detectability.

Authors:  P R Killeen
Journal:  Science       Date:  1978-01-06       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Superstitious behavior in humans.

Authors:  K Ono
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Review of the self and its brain: an argument for interactionism by Karl R. Popper and John C. Eccles (1980)

Authors:  B B Rubinstein
Journal:  Psychol Issues       Date:  1997

8.  An empirical investigation of the relationship between conservatism and superstition.

Authors:  R Boshier
Journal:  Br J Soc Clin Psychol       Date:  1973-09

9.  One-trial long-lasting food-aversion learning in wild Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata).

Authors:  T Matsuzawa; Y Hasegawa; S Gotoh; K Wada
Journal:  Behav Neural Biol       Date:  1983-11

10.  Causal belief and the origins of technology.

Authors:  Lewis Wolpert
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 4.226

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Toward a neurobiology of delusions.

Authors:  P R Corlett; J R Taylor; X-J Wang; P C Fletcher; J H Krystal
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 11.685

2.  The evolution of superstitious and superstition-like behaviour.

Authors:  Kevin R Foster; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Superstitious Beliefs and Problem Gambling Among Thai Lottery Gamblers: The Mediation Effects of Number Search and Gambling Intensity.

Authors:  Sunisa Pravichai; Vanchai Ariyabuddhiphongs
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2015-12

4.  Individuals Who Believe in the Paranormal Expose Themselves to Biased Information and Develop More Causal Illusions than Nonbelievers in the Laboratory.

Authors:  Fernando Blanco; Itxaso Barberia; Helena Matute
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The dark side of cognitive illusions: when an illusory belief interferes with the acquisition of evidence-based knowledge.

Authors:  Ion Yarritu; Helena Matute; David Luque
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2015-01-29

Review 6.  The Biology and Evolution of the Three Psychological Tendencies to Anthropomorphize Biology and Evolution.

Authors:  Marco Antonio Correa Varella
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-10-01

7.  Negatively-biased credulity and the cultural evolution of beliefs.

Authors:  Daniel M T Fessler; Anne C Pisor; Carlos David Navarrete
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Apophenia as the disposition to false positives: A unifying framework for openness and psychoticism.

Authors:  Scott D Blain; Julia M Longenecker; Rachael G Grazioplene; Bonnie Klimes-Dougan; Colin G DeYoung
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2020-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.