Literature DB >> 16812472

Intermittent reinforcement of a continuous response.

D P Rider, N N Kametani.   

Abstract

Six rats were trained with food deliveries contingent upon their pressing a lever and holding it down for either fixed or variable cumulative durations. Fixed-hold requirements ranged from 15 s to 90 s over experimental conditions; variable-hold requirements ranged from 15 s to 120 s. At most long and intermediate values, variable-hold requirements maintained more lever holding than fixed requirements. At the longest hold requirements studied, more lever holding was maintained by variable requirements than by fixed requirements of equivalent mean length for each rat. Postreinforcement-pause duration increased with lever-holding time for both fixed- and variable-hold requirements. At comparable lever-holding times per reinforcer, longer pauses typically were produced by fixed requirements than by variable requirements. Data from this study on the maintenance of responding, temporal response patterns, and postreinforcement pausing are comparable to those obtained with intermittent reinforcement of discrete responses. These findings suggest that the response-reinforcer relation specified by a reinforcement schedule is a fundamental determinant of responding, whether responding consists of discrete units or of continuous activity.

Entities:  

Year:  1987        PMID: 16812472      PMCID: PMC1348299          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1987.47-81

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  24 in total

1.  Choice as time allocation.

Authors:  W M Baum; H C Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  A two-state analysis of fixed-interval responding in the pigeon.

Authors:  B A Schneider
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Temporal control of behavior: schedule interactions.

Authors:  P Harzem; C F Lowe; P T Spencer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Species differences in temporal control of behavior.

Authors:  C F Lowe; P Harzem
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Editorial.

Authors:  P N Hineline
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Time allocation in human vigilance.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Some effects of relative reinforcement rate and changeover delay in response-independent concurrent schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  A J Brownstein; S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Interreinforcement time, work time, and the postreinforcement pause.

Authors:  D P Rider; N N Kametani
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Time-based and count-based measurement of preference.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Contrast, induction, facilitation, suppression, and conservation.

Authors:  J Allison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  2 in total

1.  Continuous versus discrete dimensions of reinforcement schedules: An integrative analysis.

Authors:  D C Williams; J M Johnston
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The effects of reinforcement frequency and response requirements on the maintenance of behavior.

Authors:  D P Rider; B J D'Angelo
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 2.468

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.